Download the official Versus Android app now Android app on Google Play

Apple iPhone 4S 16GB vs Apple iPhone 5 32GB

Top Four Reasons for the

Apple iPhone 4S 16GB

Compared to Apple iPhone 5 32GB

anonymous
1243
A little bit higher pixel density
Reply
330 ppi
vs
326 ppi
1.23% higher pixel density
anonymous
100
Significantly lower SAR for body (USA)
Reply
0.98 W/kg
vs
1.18 W/kg
0.20 W/kg lower SAR for body (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at hip level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.
anonymous
-194
Shorter
Reply
115.2 mm
vs
123.8 mm
8.60 mm shorter
Apple A5 APL0498
Yes
vs
No
Top 0 Reasons for Apple A5 APL0498
Imagination Technologies PowerVR SGX543 MP2
Yes
vs
No
Top 1 Reason for Imagination Technologies PowerVR SGX543 MP2
anonymous
31
Newer version of OpenGL
Reply
2.1
vs
2
Newer version of OpenGL. OpenGL is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.

Apple iPhone 4S 16GB is better than Apple iPhone 5 32GB because...

Yes
vs
No

Top 30 Reasons for the

Apple iPhone 5 32GB

Compared to Apple iPhone 4S 16GB

anonymous
1961
Modestly more battery power
Reply
1440 mAh
vs
1418 mAh
1.55% more battery power
anonymous
1513
Considerably faster CPU clock speed
Reply
2 x 1.3 GHz
vs
2 x 0.8 GHz
1.63x faster CPU clock speed
anonymous
1094
Amply more RAM memory
Reply
1 GB
vs
0.5 GB
0.50 GB more RAM memory
anonymous
961
Bigger screen size
Reply
4 "
vs
3.5 "
14.29% bigger screen size. The bigger the screen size is, the better the user experience.
anonymous
900
Significantly higher resolution
Reply
1136x640 px
vs
960x640 px
18.33% higher resolution
anonymous
628
Substantially more megapixel (photo, front camera)
Reply
1.2 MP
vs
0.3 MP
4x more megapixel (photo, front camera)
anonymous
406
Significantly faster downloads
Reply
100 MBits/s
vs
14.4 MBits/s
6.94x faster downloads
anonymous
333
Lighter
Reply
112 g
vs
140 g
28 g lighter
anonymous
325
Appreciably more internal storage
Reply
32 GB
vs
16 GB
16 GB more internal storage
anonymous
320
Thinner
Reply
7.6 mm
vs
9.3 mm
1.70 mm thinner
anonymous
301
Has a dedicated camera button
Reply
Yes
vs
No
A dedicated camera button allows you to take snapshots more easily.
anonymous
158
Has continuous autofocus when recording movies
Reply
Yes
vs
No
When recording movies they stay focussed and sharp.
anonymous
141
Appreciably more microphone(s)
Reply
3
vs
2
1 more microphone(s). More microphones result in better sound quality and enable the device to filter out background noise.
anonymous
138
Distinctly faster uploads
Reply
50 MBits/s
vs
5.76 MBits/s
8.68x faster uploads
anonymous
129
Considerably smaller semiconductor size
Reply
32 nm
vs
45 nm
13 nm smaller semiconductor size. A smaller size indicates that the process to create the chip is newer.
anonymous
127
Has a video light
Reply
Yes
vs
No
A video light helps when recording a movie in low-light situation like a party.
anonymous
103
Higher GeekBench result
Reply
708
vs
262
Higher GeekBench result. This is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the performance of the CPU. (Source: Primate Labs, 2014)
anonymous
99
Has manual ISO
Reply
Yes
vs
No
This allows to manually set the ISO level.
anonymous
72
Lower SAR for head (EU)
Reply
0.95 W/kg
vs
0.99 W/kg
0.04 W/kg lower SAR for head (EU). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 2.0 W/kg in the EU.
anonymous
56
Has AF tracking
Reply
Yes
vs
No
With AF tracking, once you choose the subject and press the shutter release part way down, as the subject moves, the autofocus will follow it. No more out of focus shots.
anonymous
20
Measurably less shutter lag
Reply
0.24 s
vs
0.4 s
0.16 s less shutter lag. The amount of time it takes the camera to take a photo, without having to focus.
anonymous
18
Vastly less startup delay
Reply
0.84 s
vs
1.4 s
0.56 s less startup delay. It takes less time for the camera to turn on and take a first picture.
anonymous
-180
Marginally less body volume
Reply
55.1 cm³
vs
60.6 cm³
9.98% less body volume
Apple A6
Yes
vs
No
Top 2 Reasons for Apple A6
anonymous
62
Explicitly higher ram speed
Reply
533 MHz
vs
400 MHz
133 MHz higher ram speed. It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.
anonymous
38
Substantially more memory bandwidth
Reply
8.5 GB/s
vs
6.4 GB/s
2.10 GB/s more memory bandwidth. This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.
Apple Swift
Yes
vs
No
Top 3 Reasons for Apple Swift
anonymous
41
Noticeably wider front-end
Reply
3
vs
2
1 wider front-end. The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better
anonymous
39
Supports hardware-assisted virtualization
Reply
Yes
vs
No
It is easier to obtain better performance when using virtualization if it is hardware-assisted.
anonymous
31
Significantly newer version of VFP
Reply
4
vs
3
1 newer version of VFP. Vector Floating-Point (VFP) is used by the processor to deliver increased performance in areas such as digital imaging.
Imagination Technologies PowerVR SGX543 MP3
Yes
vs
No
Top 2 Reasons for Imagination Technologies PowerVR SGX543 MP3
anonymous
78
Significantly faster GPU clock speed
Reply
266 MHz
vs
200 MHz
66 MHz faster GPU clock speed. The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.
anonymous
49
Notably higher floating-point performance
Reply
0.0255 TFLOPS
vs
0.0128 TFLOPS
0.01 TFLOPS higher floating-point performance. Floating-point performance is a measurement of the raw processing power of the GPU.

Apple iPhone 5 32GB is better than Apple iPhone 4S 16GB because...

Yes
vs
No

Compare with other products

x
Join