Top Four Reasons for the Apple iPhone 4S 16GB

Top 31 Reasons for the Apple iPhone 5 32GB

 
 
Which is better? Show result
0
0

Apple iPhone 4S 16GB vs Apple iPhone 5 32GB

Top Four Reasons for the

Apple iPhone 4S 16GB

Compared to Apple iPhone 5 32GB

2483
A little higher pixel density
Comment
330ppi
vs
326ppi
1.23% higher pixel density

×

295
Shorter
Comment
115.2mm
vs
123.8mm
8.60mm shorter

×

134
Appreciably lower SAR for body (USA)
Comment
0.98W/kg
vs
1.18W/kg
0.20W/kg lower SAR for body (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at hip level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.

×

Apple A5 APL0498
Yes
vs
No
Top 0 Reasons for Apple A5 APL0498
Imagination Technologies PowerVR SGX543 MP2
Yes
vs
No
Top 1 Reason for Imagination Technologies PowerVR SGX543 MP2
57
Newer version of OpenGL
Comment
2.1
vs
2
Newer version of OpenGL. OpenGL is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.

×

Apple iPhone 4S 16GB is better than Apple iPhone 5 32GB because...

Yes
vs
No

Please choose the related object

Top 31 Reasons for the

Apple iPhone 5 32GB

Compared to Apple iPhone 4S 16GB

3624
A tad more battery power
Comment
1440mAh
vs
1418mAh
1.55% more battery power

×

2933
Measurably faster CPU clock speed
Comment
2 x 1.3GHz
vs
2 x 0.8GHz
1.63x faster CPU clock speed

×

2051
Bigger screen size
Comment
4"
vs
3.5"
14.29% bigger screen size. The bigger the screen size is, the better the user experience.

×

1722
Lots more RAM memory
Comment
1GB
vs
0.5GB
0.50GB more RAM memory

×

1675
Notably higher resolution
Comment
1136x640px
vs
960x640px
18.33% higher resolution

×

1460
Vastly more megapixel (photo, front camera)
Comment
1.2MP
vs
0.3MP
4x more megapixel (photo, front camera)

×

1045
Lighter
Comment
112g
vs
140g
28g lighter

×

886
Thinner
Comment
7.6mm
vs
9.3mm
1.70mm thinner

×

725
Considerably more internal storage
Comment
32GB
vs
16GB
16GB more internal storage

×

667
Significantly faster downloads
Comment
100MBits/s
vs
14.4MBits/s
6.94x faster downloads

×

564
Has a dedicated camera button
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A dedicated camera button allows you to take snapshots more easily.

×

298
Has continuous autofocus when recording movies
Comment
Yes
vs
No
When recording movies they stay focussed and sharp.

×

292
Significantly more microphone(s)
Comment
3
vs
2
1 more microphone(s). More microphones result in better sound quality and enable the device to filter out background noise.

×

270
Has a video light
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A video light helps when recording a movie in low-light situation like a party.

×

257
Vastly smaller semiconductor size
Comment
32nm
vs
45nm
13nm smaller semiconductor size. A smaller size indicates that the process to create the chip is newer.

×

219
Notably faster uploads
Comment
50MBits/s
vs
5.76MBits/s
8.68x faster uploads

×

213
Has manual ISO
Comment
Yes
vs
No
This allows to manually set the ISO level.

×

206
Higher GeekBench result
Comment
708
vs
262
Higher GeekBench result. This is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the performance of the CPU. (Source: Primate Labs, 2015)

×

189
Has AF tracking
Comment
Yes
vs
No
With AF tracking, once you choose the subject and press the shutter release part way down, as the subject moves, the autofocus will follow it. No more out of focus shots.

×

99
A tad less body volume
Comment
55.1cm³
vs
60.6cm³
9.98% less body volume

×

96
Lower SAR for head (EU)
Comment
0.95W/kg
vs
0.99W/kg
0.04W/kg lower SAR for head (EU). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 2.0 W/kg in the EU.

×

22
Noticeably less shutter lag
Comment
0.24s
vs
0.4s
0.16s less shutter lag. The amount of time it takes the camera to take a photo, without having to focus.

×

21
Considerably less startup delay
Comment
0.84s
vs
1.4s
0.56s less startup delay. It takes less time for the camera to turn on and take a first picture.

×

Ádám Szirtes
2
SGH S 5611
Comment
Yes
vs
No
SGH S 7350

×

Apple A6
Yes
vs
No
Top 2 Reasons for Apple A6
240
Appreciably higher ram speed
Comment
533MHz
vs
400MHz
133MHz higher ram speed. It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.

×

114
Appreciably more memory bandwidth
Comment
8.5GB/s
vs
6.4GB/s
2.10GB/s more memory bandwidth. This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.

×

Apple Swift
Yes
vs
No
Top 3 Reasons for Apple Swift
104
Supports hardware-assisted virtualization
Comment
Yes
vs
No
It is easier to obtain better performance when using virtualization if it is hardware-assisted.

×

98
Vastly wider front-end
Comment
3
vs
2
1 wider front-end. The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better

×

48
Noticeably newer version of VFP
Comment
4
vs
3
1 newer version of VFP. Vector Floating-Point (VFP) is used by the processor to deliver increased performance in areas such as digital imaging.

×

Imagination Technologies PowerVR SGX543 MP3
Yes
vs
No
Top 2 Reasons for Imagination Technologies PowerVR SGX543 MP3
334
Distinctly faster GPU clock speed
Comment
266MHz
vs
200MHz
66MHz faster GPU clock speed. The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.

×

197
Significantly higher floating-point performance
Comment
0.0255TFLOPS
vs
0.0128TFLOPS
0.01TFLOPS higher floating-point performance. Floating-point performance is a measurement of the raw processing power of the GPU.

×

Apple iPhone 5 32GB is better than Apple iPhone 4S 16GB because...

Yes
vs
No

Please choose the related object

x
Join