Apple iPhone 4S 16GB vs Apple iPhone 5 32GB

Top Three Reasons for the

Apple iPhone 4S 16GB

Compared to Apple iPhone 5 32GB

anonymous
664
Slightly higher pixel density
330 ppi
vs
326 ppi
1.23% higher pixel density
anonymous
64
Noticeably lower SAR for body (USA)
0.98 W/kg
vs
1.18 W/kg
0.20 W/kg lower SAR for body (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at hip level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.
Matilda Demanski
-24
Universal Apple Care/Genius Care
Yes
vs
No
anonymous
-397
Shorter
115.2 mm
vs
123.8 mm
8.60 mm shorter

Apple iPhone 4S 16GB is better than Apple iPhone 5 32GB because...

Yes
vs
No

Top 23 Reasons for the

Apple iPhone 5 32GB

Compared to Apple iPhone 4S 16GB

anonymous
1061
A tad more battery power
1440 mAh
vs
1418 mAh
1.55% more battery power
anonymous
826
Considerably faster CPU clock speed
2 x 1.3 GHz
vs
2 x 0.8 GHz
1.63x faster CPU clock speed
anonymous
624
Reasonably more RAM memory
1 GB
vs
0.5 GB
0.50 GB more RAM memory
anonymous
570
Sizably higher resolution
1136x640 px
vs
960x640 px
18.33% higher resolution
anonymous
467
Bigger screen size
4 "
vs
3.5 "
14.29% bigger screen size. The bigger the screen size is, the better the user experience.
anonymous
280
Vastly more megapixel (photo, front camera)
1.2 MP
vs
0.3 MP
4x more megapixel (photo, front camera)
anonymous
231
Distinctly faster downloads
100 MBits/s
vs
14.4 MBits/s
6.94x faster downloads
anonymous
149
Significantly more internal storage
32 GB
vs
16 GB
16 GB more internal storage
anonymous
136
Has a dedicated camera button
Yes
vs
No
A dedicated camera button allows you to take snapshots more easily.
anonymous
95
Has continuous autofocus when recording movies
Yes
vs
No
When recording movies they stay focussed and sharp.
anonymous
92
Thinner
7.6 mm
vs
9.3 mm
1.70 mm thinner
anonymous
87
Explicitly faster uploads
50 MBits/s
vs
5.76 MBits/s
8.68x faster uploads
anonymous
82
Lighter
112 g
vs
140 g
28 g lighter
anonymous
81
Clearly smaller semiconductor size
32 nm
vs
45 nm
13 nm smaller semiconductor size. A smaller size indicates that the process to create the chip is newer.
anonymous
70
Sizably more microphone(s)
3
vs
2
1 more microphone(s). More microphones result in better sound quality and enable the device to filter out background noise.
anonymous
54
Has a video light
Yes
vs
No
A video light helps when recording a movie in low-light situation like a party.
anonymous
43
Lower SAR for head (EU)
0.95 W/kg
vs
0.99 W/kg
0.04 W/kg lower SAR for head (EU). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 2.0 W/kg in the EU.
anonymous
39
Has manual ISO
Yes
vs
No
This allows to manually set the ISO level.
anonymous
20
Notably less shutter lag
0.24 s
vs
0.4 s
0.16 s less shutter lag. The amount of time it takes the camera to take a photo, without having to focus.
anonymous
18
Noticeably less startup delay
0.84 s
vs
1.4 s
0.56 s less startup delay. It takes less time for the camera to turn on and take a first picture.
anonymous
7
Has AF tracking
Yes
vs
No
With AF tracking, once you choose the subject and press the shutter release part way down, as the subject moves, the autofocus will follow it. No more out of focus shots.
Piboon Amornjiraporn
1
Better GPS signal
Yes
vs
No
Oppo r1 got worse GPS signal not recommend for user that always use maps
Clayton Fuller
-3
This is totaly one sided
Yes
vs
No
YES
anonymous
-362
Modestly less body volume
55.1 cm³
vs
60.6 cm³
9.98% less body volume

Apple iPhone 5 32GB is better than Apple iPhone 4S 16GB because...

Yes
vs
No

Compare with other products

x
Join