Download the official Versus Android app now Android app on Google Play

Apple iPhone 4S 16GB vs Apple iPhone 5 32GB

Top Four Reasons for the

Apple iPhone 4S 16GB

Compared to Apple iPhone 5 32GB

anonymous
1713
Slightly higher pixel density
Comment
330 ppi
vs
326 ppi
1.23% higher pixel density
anonymous
115
Substantially lower SAR for body (USA)
Comment
0.98 W/kg
vs
1.18 W/kg
0.20 W/kg lower SAR for body (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at hip level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.
anonymous
13
Shorter
Comment
115.2 mm
vs
123.8 mm
8.60 mm shorter
Apple A5 APL0498
Yes
vs
No
Top 0 Reasons for Apple A5 APL0498
Imagination Technologies PowerVR SGX543 MP2
Yes
vs
No
Top 1 Reason for Imagination Technologies PowerVR SGX543 MP2
anonymous
41
Newer version of OpenGL
Comment
2.1
vs
2
Newer version of OpenGL. OpenGL is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.

Apple iPhone 4S 16GB is better than Apple iPhone 5 32GB because...

Yes
vs
No

Top 31 Reasons for the

Apple iPhone 5 32GB

Compared to Apple iPhone 4S 16GB

anonymous
2599
A shade more battery power
Comment
1440 mAh
vs
1418 mAh
1.55% more battery power
anonymous
2038
Notably faster CPU clock speed
Comment
2 x 1.3 GHz
vs
2 x 0.8 GHz
1.63x faster CPU clock speed
anonymous
1351
Bigger screen size
Comment
4 "
vs
3.5 "
14.29% bigger screen size. The bigger the screen size is, the better the user experience.
anonymous
1344
Way more RAM memory
Comment
1 GB
vs
0.5 GB
0.50 GB more RAM memory
anonymous
1210
Measurably higher resolution
Comment
1136x640 px
vs
960x640 px
18.33% higher resolution
anonymous
949
Appreciably more megapixel (photo, front camera)
Comment
1.2 MP
vs
0.3 MP
4x more megapixel (photo, front camera)
anonymous
593
Lighter
Comment
112 g
vs
140 g
28 g lighter
anonymous
517
Thinner
Comment
7.6 mm
vs
9.3 mm
1.70 mm thinner
anonymous
516
Notably faster downloads
Comment
100 MBits/s
vs
14.4 MBits/s
6.94x faster downloads
anonymous
459
Notably more internal storage
Comment
32 GB
vs
16 GB
16 GB more internal storage
anonymous
414
Has a dedicated camera button
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A dedicated camera button allows you to take snapshots more easily.
anonymous
200
Has continuous autofocus when recording movies
Comment
Yes
vs
No
When recording movies they stay focussed and sharp.
anonymous
197
Noticeably more microphone(s)
Comment
3
vs
2
1 more microphone(s). More microphones result in better sound quality and enable the device to filter out background noise.
anonymous
179
Has a video light
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A video light helps when recording a movie in low-light situation like a party.
anonymous
171
Appreciably smaller semiconductor size
Comment
32 nm
vs
45 nm
13 nm smaller semiconductor size. A smaller size indicates that the process to create the chip is newer.
anonymous
170
Measurably faster uploads
Comment
50 MBits/s
vs
5.76 MBits/s
8.68x faster uploads
anonymous
149
Higher GeekBench result
Comment
708
vs
262
Higher GeekBench result. This is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the performance of the CPU. (Source: Primate Labs, 2014)
anonymous
137
Has manual ISO
Comment
Yes
vs
No
This allows to manually set the ISO level.
anonymous
107
Has AF tracking
Comment
Yes
vs
No
With AF tracking, once you choose the subject and press the shutter release part way down, as the subject moves, the autofocus will follow it. No more out of focus shots.
anonymous
82
Lower SAR for head (EU)
Comment
0.95 W/kg
vs
0.99 W/kg
0.04 W/kg lower SAR for head (EU). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 2.0 W/kg in the EU.
anonymous
20
Clearly less shutter lag
Comment
0.24 s
vs
0.4 s
0.16 s less shutter lag. The amount of time it takes the camera to take a photo, without having to focus.
anonymous
19
Explicitly less startup delay
Comment
0.84 s
vs
1.4 s
0.56 s less startup delay. It takes less time for the camera to turn on and take a first picture.
Ádám Szirtes
1
SGH S 5611
Comment
Yes
vs
No
SGH S 7350
anonymous
-45
Modestly less body volume
Comment
55.1 cm³
vs
60.6 cm³
9.98% less body volume
Apple A6
Yes
vs
No
Top 2 Reasons for Apple A6
anonymous
121
Noticeably higher ram speed
Comment
533 MHz
vs
400 MHz
133 MHz higher ram speed. It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.
anonymous
64
Considerably more memory bandwidth
Comment
8.5 GB/s
vs
6.4 GB/s
2.10 GB/s more memory bandwidth. This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.
Apple Swift
Yes
vs
No
Top 3 Reasons for Apple Swift
anonymous
67
Vastly wider front-end
Comment
3
vs
2
1 wider front-end. The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better
anonymous
61
Supports hardware-assisted virtualization
Comment
Yes
vs
No
It is easier to obtain better performance when using virtualization if it is hardware-assisted.
anonymous
37
Explicitly newer version of VFP
Comment
4
vs
3
1 newer version of VFP. Vector Floating-Point (VFP) is used by the processor to deliver increased performance in areas such as digital imaging.
Imagination Technologies PowerVR SGX543 MP3
Yes
vs
No
Top 2 Reasons for Imagination Technologies PowerVR SGX543 MP3
anonymous
185
Vastly faster GPU clock speed
Comment
266 MHz
vs
200 MHz
66 MHz faster GPU clock speed. The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.
anonymous
95
Sizably higher floating-point performance
Comment
0.0255 TFLOPS
vs
0.0128 TFLOPS
0.01 TFLOPS higher floating-point performance. Floating-point performance is a measurement of the raw processing power of the GPU.

Apple iPhone 5 32GB is better than Apple iPhone 4S 16GB because...

Yes
vs
No

Compare with other products

x
Join