Top Four Reasons for the Canon CanoScan 5600F

Top Five Reasons for the Canon CanoScan 9000F Mark II

 
 
Which is better? Show result
0
0

Embed this comparison:

Canon CanoScan 5600F vs Canon CanoScan 9000F Mark II

Top Four Reasons for the

Canon CanoScan 5600F

Compared to Canon CanoScan 9000F Mark II

26
Slightly lighter
Comment
4300 g
vs
4581.28 g
281.28 g lighter

×

26
Clearly narrower
Comment
272 mm
vs
480.06 mm
208.06 mm narrower

×

25
Considerably shorter
Comment
97 mm
vs
271.78 mm
174.78 mm shorter

×

25
Less body volume
Comment
13007.31 cm³
vs
14597.81 cm³
12.23% less body volume

×

Canon CanoScan 5600F is better than Canon CanoScan 9000F Mark II because...

Yes
vs
No

Please choose the related object

Top Five Reasons for the

Canon CanoScan 9000F Mark II

Compared to Canon CanoScan 5600F

26
Significantly lower power consumption on operation
Comment
15 W
vs
19 W
4 W lower power consumption on operation. How much power the device consumes when it's switched on.

×

25
Noticeably higher optical scan resolution
Comment
9600 x 9600 dpi
vs
9600 x 4800 dpi
2x higher optical scan resolution. The highest resolution the scanner can put out without using software to make it bigger. In dots per inch.

×

25
Explicitly lower power consumption on standby
Comment
0.9 W
vs
3.2 W
2.30 W lower power consumption on standby. How much power the device consumes when shut down but still plugged in.

×

25
Can synchronize documents with Evernote
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The device can save and synchronize documents with Evernote.

×

25
Distinctly thinner
Comment
111.76 mm
vs
493 mm
381.24 mm thinner

×

Canon CanoScan 9000F Mark II is better than Canon CanoScan 5600F because...

Yes
vs
No

Please choose the related object

x
Join