Canon CanoScan 5600F vs Canon CanoScan 9000F Mark II

Top Four Reasons for the

Canon CanoScan 5600F

Compared to Canon CanoScan 9000F Mark II

anonymous
25
Notably narrower
272 mm
vs
480.06 mm
208.06 mm narrower
anonymous
25
Explicitly shorter
97 mm
vs
271.78 mm
174.78 mm shorter
anonymous
25
A little bit lighter
4300 g
vs
4581.28 g
281.28 g lighter
anonymous
25
Less body volume
13007.31 cm³
vs
14597.81 cm³
12.23% less body volume

Canon CanoScan 5600F is better than Canon CanoScan 9000F Mark II because...

Yes
vs
No

Top Five Reasons for the

Canon CanoScan 9000F Mark II

Compared to Canon CanoScan 5600F

anonymous
25
Can synchronize documents with Evernote
Yes
vs
No
The device can save and synchronize documents with Evernote.
anonymous
25
Considerably thinner
111.76 mm
vs
493 mm
381.24 mm thinner
anonymous
25
Measurably lower power consumption on standby
0.9 W
vs
3.2 W
2.30 W lower power consumption on standby. How much power the device consumes when shut down but still plugged in.
anonymous
25
Significantly lower power consumption on operation
15 W
vs
19 W
4 W lower power consumption on operation. How much power the device consumes when it's switched on.
anonymous
24
Appreciably higher optical scan resolution
9600 x 9600 dpi
vs
9600 x 4800 dpi
2x higher optical scan resolution. The highest resolution the scanner can put out without using software to make it bigger. In dots per inch.

Canon CanoScan 9000F Mark II is better than Canon CanoScan 5600F because...

Yes
vs
No

Compare with other products

x
Join