Top Four Reasons for the Canon CanoScan 5600F

Top Five Reasons for the Canon CanoScan 9000F Mark II

 
 
Which is better? Show result
0
0

Canon CanoScan 5600F vs Canon CanoScan 9000F Mark II

Top Four Reasons for the

Canon CanoScan 5600F

Compared to Canon CanoScan 9000F Mark II

26
A tad lighter
Comment
4300g
vs
4581.28g
281.28g lighter

×

26
Clearly narrower
Comment
272mm
vs
480.06mm
208.06mm narrower

×

25
Measurably shorter
Comment
97mm
vs
271.78mm
174.78mm shorter

×

25
Less body volume
Comment
13007.31cm³
vs
14597.81cm³
12.23% less body volume

×

Canon CanoScan 5600F is better than Canon CanoScan 9000F Mark II because...

Yes
vs
No

Please choose the related object

Top Five Reasons for the

Canon CanoScan 9000F Mark II

Compared to Canon CanoScan 5600F

26
Substantially lower power consumption on operation
Comment
15W
vs
19W
4W lower power consumption on operation. How much power the device consumes when it's switched on.

×

25
Significantly higher optical scan resolution
Comment
9600 x 9600dpi
vs
9600 x 4800dpi
2x higher optical scan resolution. The highest resolution the scanner can put out without using software to make it bigger. In dots per inch.

×

25
Significantly lower power consumption on standby
Comment
0.9W
vs
3.2W
2.30W lower power consumption on standby. How much power the device consumes when shut down but still plugged in.

×

25
Can synchronize documents with Evernote
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The device can save and synchronize documents with Evernote.

×

25
Noticeably thinner
Comment
111.76mm
vs
493mm
381.24mm thinner

×

Canon CanoScan 9000F Mark II is better than Canon CanoScan 5600F because...

Yes
vs
No

Please choose the related object

x
Join