Top Seven Reasons for the Canon CanoScan 9000F Mark II

Top Five Reasons for the Epson Perfection V600 Photo

 
 
Which is better? Show result
0
0

Canon CanoScan 9000F Mark II vs Epson Perfection V600 Photo

Top Seven Reasons for the

Canon CanoScan 9000F Mark II

Compared to Epson Perfection V600 Photo

26
Has an Auto Scan Mode
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Auto Scan Mode detects the type of document being scanned – Photo, Post Card, Business Card, Magazine, Newspaper, Document – and automatically crops and saves files to PDF or JPEG format based on image type.

×

26
Vastly lower power consumption on operation
Comment
15W
vs
16.5W
1.50W lower power consumption on operation. How much power the device consumes when it's switched on.

×

25
Measurably higher optical scan resolution
Comment
9600 x 9600dpi
vs
9600 x 6400dpi
1.50x higher optical scan resolution. The highest resolution the scanner can put out without using software to make it bigger. In dots per inch.

×

25
Appreciably lower power consumption on standby
Comment
0.9W
vs
5.5W
4.60W lower power consumption on standby. How much power the device consumes when shut down but still plugged in.

×

25
Can synchronize documents with Evernote
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The device can save and synchronize documents with Evernote.

×

25
Measurably thinner
Comment
111.76mm
vs
482.6mm
370.84mm thinner

×

25
A little less body volume
Comment
14597.81cm³
vs
15754.52cm³
7.92% less body volume

×

Canon CanoScan 9000F Mark II is better than Epson Perfection V600 Photo because...

Yes
vs
No

Please choose the related object

Top Five Reasons for the

Epson Perfection V600 Photo

Compared to Canon CanoScan 9000F Mark II

27
Considerably higher bit depth in grayscale
Comment
16bit
vs
8bit
8bit higher bit depth in grayscale. Bit depth means the number of bits per pixel, so the higher the bit depth, the greater number of grayscales the system can scan.

×

26
Lighter
Comment
4082.33g
vs
4581.28g
498.95g lighter

×

26
Distinctly narrower
Comment
279.4mm
vs
480.06mm
200.66mm narrower

×

25
Vastly shorter
Comment
116.84mm
vs
271.78mm
154.94mm shorter

×

Ron Hare
1
Full Mac Yosemite support
Comment
Yes
vs
No
900F Yosemite driver supports only Image Capture

×

Epson Perfection V600 Photo is better than Canon CanoScan 9000F Mark II because...

Yes
vs
No

Please choose the related object

x
Join