Top Seven Reasons for the Canon CanoScan 9000F Mark II

Top Five Reasons for the Epson Perfection V600 Photo

 
 
Which is better? Show result
0
0

Embed this comparison:

Canon CanoScan 9000F Mark II vs Epson Perfection V600 Photo

Top Seven Reasons for the

Canon CanoScan 9000F Mark II

Compared to Epson Perfection V600 Photo

26
Has an Auto Scan Mode
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Auto Scan Mode detects the type of document being scanned – Photo, Post Card, Business Card, Magazine, Newspaper, Document – and automatically crops and saves files to PDF or JPEG format based on image type.

×

26
Appreciably lower power consumption on operation
Comment
15 W
vs
16.5 W
1.50 W lower power consumption on operation. How much power the device consumes when it's switched on.

×

25
Considerably higher optical scan resolution
Comment
9600 x 9600 dpi
vs
9600 x 6400 dpi
1.50x higher optical scan resolution. The highest resolution the scanner can put out without using software to make it bigger. In dots per inch.

×

25
Vastly lower power consumption on standby
Comment
0.9 W
vs
5.5 W
4.60 W lower power consumption on standby. How much power the device consumes when shut down but still plugged in.

×

25
Can synchronize documents with Evernote
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The device can save and synchronize documents with Evernote.

×

25
Clearly thinner
Comment
111.76 mm
vs
482.6 mm
370.84 mm thinner

×

25
Marginally less body volume
Comment
14597.81 cm³
vs
15754.52 cm³
7.92% less body volume

×

Canon CanoScan 9000F Mark II is better than Epson Perfection V600 Photo because...

Yes
vs
No

Please choose the related object

Top Five Reasons for the

Epson Perfection V600 Photo

Compared to Canon CanoScan 9000F Mark II

27
Vastly higher bit depth in grayscale
Comment
16 bit
vs
8 bit
8 bit higher bit depth in grayscale. Bit depth means the number of bits per pixel, so the higher the bit depth, the greater number of grayscales the system can scan.

×

26
Lighter
Comment
4082.33 g
vs
4581.28 g
498.95 g lighter

×

26
Distinctly narrower
Comment
279.4 mm
vs
480.06 mm
200.66 mm narrower

×

25
Sizably shorter
Comment
116.84 mm
vs
271.78 mm
154.94 mm shorter

×

Ron Hare
1
Full Mac Yosemite support
Comment
Yes
vs
No
900F Yosemite driver supports only Image Capture

×

Epson Perfection V600 Photo is better than Canon CanoScan 9000F Mark II because...

Yes
vs
No

Please choose the related object

x
Join