Canon EOS 1100D vs Canon EOS 600D

Top Ten Reasons for the

Canon EOS 1100D

Compared to Canon EOS 600D

anonymous
79
Lighter
Comment
495 g
vs
570 g
75 g lighter
anonymous
56
Has a stereo microphone
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A stereo microphone allows to record audio files or movies in stereo without an external microphone.
anonymous
54
A tad more battery power
Comment
1200 mAh
vs
1120 mAh
7.14% more battery power
anonymous
49
Marginally less body volume
Comment
1008.8 cm³
vs
1055.5 cm³
4.63% less body volume
anonymous
48
Explicitly longer battery life
Comment
700 shots
vs
440 shots
260 shots longer battery life. CIPA is an independent, standard measurement that determines how many shots a camera can take before the battery dies.
anonymous
44
A little bit less shutter lag
Comment
0.279 s
vs
0.283 s
0 s less shutter lag. The amount of time it takes the camera to take a photo, without having to focus.
anonymous
44
Modestly narrower
Comment
129.9 mm
vs
133.1 mm
3.20 mm narrower
anonymous
40
Significantly less startup delay
Comment
0.1 s
vs
0.4 s
0.30 s less startup delay. It takes less time for the camera to turn on and take a first picture.
anonymous
39
Slightly thinner
Comment
77.9 mm
vs
79.7 mm
1.80 mm thinner
Vilas Fasage
1
The older is the better
Comment
Yes
vs
No
More battery life 30%more even 12.2 megapixels more than enough no ďifference in picture quality 12ood is almost 60 €more expensive

Canon EOS 1100D is better than Canon EOS 600D because...

Yes
vs
No

Top 18 Reasons for the

Canon EOS 600D

Compared to Canon EOS 1100D

anonymous
162
Notably more megapixels (photo)
Comment
18.7 MP
vs
12.6 MP
48.41% more megapixels (photo)
anonymous
134
A bit larger sensor
Comment
14.9 x 22.3 mm
vs
14.7 x 22.2 mm
1.82% larger sensor. The larger the sensor the more light the sensor captures yielding in better image quality.
anonymous
111
Lower noise at high ISO
Comment
793 ISO
vs
755 ISO
5.03% lower noise at high ISO. The maximum ISO at which the device still captures excellent quality images. Source: DxOMark.
anonymous
100
Measurably faster shooting at highest resolution with AF as JPEG format
Comment
3.7 fps
vs
3 fps
23.33% faster shooting at highest resolution with AF as JPEG format. Fast continuous shooting is useful for catching action shots.
anonymous
89
Has a flip-out screen
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Flip-out screens are useful for doing tricky shots.
anonymous
88
Better image quality
Comment
65
vs
62
3 better image quality. A device's overall image quality score considers: color depth, dynamic range and low light performance. Source: DxOMark.
anonymous
82
Significantly higher maximum light sensitivity
Comment
12800 ISO
vs
6400 ISO
2x higher maximum light sensitivity. With a higher light sensitivity (ISO level), the sensor absorbs more light. This can be used to capture moving objects using a fast shutter speed, or to take images in low light without using a flash.
anonymous
69
Noticeably better video recording quality
Comment
1080 x 30 fps
vs
720 x 29.97 fps
1.50x better video recording quality
anonymous
61
Marginally better color depth
Comment
22.1 bits
vs
21.9 bits
0.91% better color depth. The better a device's color depth the more color nuances it can distinguish. Source: DxOMark.
anonymous
57
Faster video autofocus due to a phase detection autofocus when shooting movies
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A phase detection autofocus is much faster than a contrast detection autofocus and allows sharper movies.
anonymous
52
Significantly higher pixel density
Comment
501 ppi
vs
262 ppi
1.91x higher pixel density
anonymous
50
Wider dynamic range
Comment
11.5 Evs
vs
11 Evs
4.55% wider dynamic range. The better the dynamic range the system captures a wider number of values from dark to light leading to more details in low and highlights. Source: DxOMark.
anonymous
49
Substantially higher resolution
Comment
1250x833 px
vs
588x392 px
4.52x higher resolution
anonymous
43
Has a microphone in
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A microphone port allows connecting external high-end or specialized microphones.
anonymous
41
Appreciably higher resolution (screen)
Comment
1040 k dots
vs
230 k dots
810 k dots higher resolution (screen). A higher screen resolution provides a sharper image, making it easier to review your photos.
anonymous
38
A little bit shorter
Comment
99.5 mm
vs
99.7 mm
0.20 mm shorter
anonymous
38
Somewhat bigger screen size
Comment
3 "
vs
2.7 "
11.11% bigger screen size. The bigger the screen size is, the better the user experience.
Jerry Grynspan
1
Has an eyepiece viewfinder included
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Olympus charges extra for the viewfinder

Canon EOS 600D is better than Canon EOS 1100D because...

Yes
vs
No

Compare with other products

x
Join