Top Ten Reasons for the Canon EOS 1100D

Top 18 Reasons for the Canon EOS 600D

 
 
Which is better? Show result
0
0

Embed this comparison:

Canon EOS 1100D vs Canon EOS 600D

Top Ten Reasons for the

Canon EOS 1100D

Compared to Canon EOS 600D

100
Lighter
Comment
495 g
vs
570 g
75 g lighter

×

69
Appreciably longer battery life
Comment
700 shots
vs
440 shots
260 shots longer battery life. CIPA is an independent, standard measurement that determines how many shots a camera can take before the battery dies.

×

68
Has a stereo microphone
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A stereo microphone allows to record audio files or movies in stereo without an external microphone.

×

59
A little more battery power
Comment
1200 mAh
vs
1120 mAh
7.14% more battery power

×

55
A shade less body volume
Comment
1008.8 cm³
vs
1055.5 cm³
4.63% less body volume

×

50
A little narrower
Comment
129.9 mm
vs
133.1 mm
3.20 mm narrower

×

48
Modestly thinner
Comment
77.9 mm
vs
79.7 mm
1.80 mm thinner

×

45
Slightly less shutter lag
Comment
0.279 s
vs
0.283 s
0 s less shutter lag. The amount of time it takes the camera to take a photo, without having to focus.

×

42
Noticeably less startup delay
Comment
0.1 s
vs
0.4 s
0.30 s less startup delay. It takes less time for the camera to turn on and take a first picture.

×

Vilas Fasage
1
The older is the better
Comment
Yes
vs
No
More battery life 30%more even 12.2 megapixels more than enough no ďifference in picture quality 12ood is almost 60 €more expensive

×

Canon EOS 1100D is better than Canon EOS 600D because...

Yes
vs
No

Please choose the related object

Top 18 Reasons for the

Canon EOS 600D

Compared to Canon EOS 1100D

221
Clearly more megapixels (photo)
Comment
18.7 MP
vs
12.6 MP
48.41% more megapixels (photo)

×

172
A bit larger sensor
Comment
14.9 x 22.3 mm
vs
14.7 x 22.2 mm
1.82% larger sensor. The larger the sensor the more light the sensor captures yielding in better image quality.

×

135
Lower noise at high ISO
Comment
793 ISO
vs
755 ISO
5.03% lower noise at high ISO. The maximum ISO at which the device still captures excellent quality images. Source: DxOMark.

×

121
Has a flip-out screen
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Flip-out screens are useful for doing tricky shots.

×

119
Distinctly faster shooting at highest resolution with AF as JPEG format
Comment
3.7 fps
vs
3 fps
23.33% faster shooting at highest resolution with AF as JPEG format. Fast continuous shooting is useful for catching action shots.

×

105
Better image quality
Comment
65
vs
62
3 better image quality. A device's overall image quality score considers: color depth, dynamic range and low light performance. Source: DxOMark.

×

92
Noticeably higher maximum light sensitivity
Comment
12800 ISO
vs
6400 ISO
2x higher maximum light sensitivity. With a higher light sensitivity (ISO level), the sensor absorbs more light. This can be used to capture moving objects using a fast shutter speed, or to take images in low light without using a flash.

×

84
Significantly better video recording quality
Comment
1080 x 30 fps
vs
720 x 29.97 fps
1.50x better video recording quality

×

70
A little better color depth
Comment
22.1 bits
vs
21.9 bits
0.91% better color depth. The better a device's color depth the more color nuances it can distinguish. Source: DxOMark.

×

67
Faster video autofocus due to a phase detection autofocus when shooting movies
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A phase detection autofocus is much faster than a contrast detection autofocus and allows sharper movies.

×

65
Distinctly higher pixel density
Comment
501 ppi
vs
262 ppi
1.91x higher pixel density

×

57
Wider dynamic range
Comment
11.5 Evs
vs
11 Evs
4.55% wider dynamic range. The better the dynamic range the system captures a wider number of values from dark to light leading to more details in low and highlights. Source: DxOMark.

×

57
Significantly higher resolution
Comment
1250x833 px
vs
588x392 px
4.52x higher resolution

×

54
Has a microphone in
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A microphone port allows connecting external high-end or specialized microphones.

×

53
Modestly shorter
Comment
99.5 mm
vs
99.7 mm
0.20 mm shorter

×

53
Substantially higher resolution (screen)
Comment
1040 k dots
vs
230 k dots
810 k dots higher resolution (screen). A higher screen resolution provides a sharper image, making it easier to review your photos.

×

42
A bit bigger screen size
Comment
3 "
vs
2.7 "
11.11% bigger screen size. The bigger the screen size is, the better the user experience.

×

Jerry Grynspan
1
Has an eyepiece viewfinder included
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Olympus charges extra for the viewfinder

×

William Chong
0
Substantially Cheaper
Comment
Yes
vs
No
350$ vs 600$

×

Canon EOS 600D is better than Canon EOS 1100D because...

Yes
vs
No

Please choose the related object

x
Join