Top Seven Reasons for the Canon EOS 1100D

Top 23 Reasons for the Nikon D5100

 
 
Which is better? Show result
0
0

Embed this comparison:

Canon EOS 1100D vs Nikon D5100

Top Seven Reasons for the

Canon EOS 1100D

Compared to Nikon D5100

100
Marginally lighter
Comment
495 g
vs
510 g
15 g lighter

×

69
A lot longer battery life
Comment
700 shots
vs
660 shots
40 shots longer battery life. CIPA is an independent, standard measurement that determines how many shots a camera can take before the battery dies.

×

68
Has a stereo microphone
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A stereo microphone allows to record audio files or movies in stereo without an external microphone.

×

59
More battery power
Comment
1200 mAh
vs
1030 mAh
16.50% more battery power

×

48
A little bit thinner
Comment
77.9 mm
vs
78.7 mm
0.80 mm thinner

×

42
Significantly less startup delay
Comment
0.1 s
vs
0.5 s
0.40 s less startup delay. It takes less time for the camera to turn on and take a first picture.

×

Vilas Fasage
1
The older is the better
Comment
Yes
vs
No
More battery life 30%more even 12.2 megapixels more than enough no ďifference in picture quality 12ood is almost 60 €more expensive

×

Canon EOS 1100D is better than Nikon D5100 because...

Yes
vs
No

Please choose the related object

Top 23 Reasons for the

Nikon D5100

Compared to Canon EOS 1100D

219
Appreciably more megapixels (photo)
Comment
16.9 MP
vs
12.6 MP
34.13% more megapixels (photo)

×

171
Sizably larger sensor
Comment
15.6 x 23.6 mm
vs
14.7 x 22.2 mm
12.81% larger sensor. The larger the sensor the more light the sensor captures yielding in better image quality.

×

135
Appreciably lower noise at high ISO
Comment
1183 ISO
vs
755 ISO
1.57x lower noise at high ISO. The maximum ISO at which the device still captures excellent quality images. Source: DxOMark.

×

133
Appreciably more focus points
Comment
11
vs
9
2 more focus points. The more focus points the more flexibility in picking which part of the scene to focus on. They also give the image sensor a better probability in identifying the right area of the scene to focus on in more automatic modes.

×

120
Has a flip-out screen
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Flip-out screens are useful for doing tricky shots.

×

119
Substantially faster shooting at highest resolution with AF as JPEG format
Comment
4 fps
vs
3 fps
33.33% faster shooting at highest resolution with AF as JPEG format. Fast continuous shooting is useful for catching action shots.

×

105
Vastly better image quality
Comment
80
vs
62
18 better image quality. A device's overall image quality score considers: color depth, dynamic range and low light performance. Source: DxOMark.

×

92
Clearly higher maximum light sensitivity
Comment
25600 ISO
vs
6400 ISO
4x higher maximum light sensitivity. With a higher light sensitivity (ISO level), the sensor absorbs more light. This can be used to capture moving objects using a fast shutter speed, or to take images in low light without using a flash.

×

84
Substantially better video recording quality
Comment
1080 x 30 fps
vs
720 x 29.97 fps
1.50x better video recording quality

×

70
Lots better color depth
Comment
23.5 bits
vs
21.9 bits
7.31% better color depth. The better a device's color depth the more color nuances it can distinguish. Source: DxOMark.

×

67
Faster video autofocus due to a phase detection autofocus when shooting movies
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A phase detection autofocus is much faster than a contrast detection autofocus and allows sharper movies.

×

65
Clearly higher pixel density
Comment
471 ppi
vs
262 ppi
1.80x higher pixel density

×

57
Sizably wider dynamic range
Comment
13.6 Evs
vs
11 Evs
23.64% wider dynamic range. The better the dynamic range the system captures a wider number of values from dark to light leading to more details in low and highlights. Source: DxOMark.

×

57
Vastly higher resolution
Comment
1176x784 px
vs
588x392 px
4x higher resolution

×

56
Has a built-in HDR mode
Comment
Yes
vs
No
It can automatically shoot pictures with a higher dynamic range (HDR).

×

55
Modestly less body volume
Comment
964.5 cm³
vs
1008.8 cm³
4.59% less body volume

×

54
Has a microphone in
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A microphone port allows connecting external high-end or specialized microphones.

×

53
A shade shorter
Comment
96.5 mm
vs
99.7 mm
3.20 mm shorter

×

53
Notably higher resolution (screen)
Comment
921 k dots
vs
230 k dots
691 k dots higher resolution (screen). A higher screen resolution provides a sharper image, making it easier to review your photos.

×

50
A shade narrower
Comment
127 mm
vs
129.9 mm
2.90 mm narrower

×

45
A tad less shutter lag
Comment
0.273 s
vs
0.279 s
0.01 s less shutter lag. The amount of time it takes the camera to take a photo, without having to focus.

×

42
A little bigger screen size
Comment
3 "
vs
2.7 "
11.11% bigger screen size. The bigger the screen size is, the better the user experience.

×

Bartosz Jakub Wojciechowski
1
Nikon d70s
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Nikon d3200

×

Gian Giacomo Ermacora
0
Has the same processor
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Is quite easy to use every day and the image quality is almost the same due the same image processor. D7000 is more accurate for the focus metering.

×

Nikon D5100 is better than Canon EOS 1100D because...

Yes
vs
No

Please choose the related object

x
Join