Clearly lower noise at high ISO
1183 ISO vs 722 ISO—1.64x lower noise at high ISO. The maximum ISO at which the device still captures excellent quality images. We use metrics from http://wwww.dxomark.com.
Clearly larger sensor
15.6 x 23.6 mm
14.9 x 22.3 mm
15.6 x 23.6 mm vs 14.9 x 22.3 mm—10.80% larger sensor. The larger the sensor the more light the sensor captures yielding in better image quality.
Significantly better image quality
80 vs 62 —18 better image quality. A device's overall image quality score considers: color depth, dynamic range and low light performance. We use metrics from http://wwww.dxomark.com.
Has a microphone in
A microphone port allows connecting external high-end or specialized microphones.
Plenty better color depth
23.5 bits vs 21.7 bits—8.29% better color depth. The better a device's color depth the more color nuances it can distinguish. We use metrics from http://wwww.dxomark.com.
More lenses available
169 vs 162 —7 more lenses available. A bigger variety of brand lenses means that you have more options and can find one that suits your needs.
510 g vs 575 g—65 g lighter
Notably wider dynamic range
13.6 EV vs 11.2 EV—21.43% wider dynamic range. The better the dynamic range the system captures a wider number of values from dark to light leading to more details in low and highlights.
Marginally less body volume
964.5 cm³ vs 1046.7 cm³—8.52% less body volume
127 mm vs 133.1 mm—6.10 mm narrower
A bit thinner
78.7 mm vs 78.8 mm—0.10 mm thinner
Notably more focus points
11 vs 9 —2 more focus points. The more focus points the more flexibility in picking which part of the scene to focus on. They also give the image sensor a better probability in identifying the right area of the scene to focus on in more automatic modes.
96.5 mm vs 99.8 mm—3.30 mm shorter