Download the official Versus Android app now Android app on Google Play

Canon PowerShot A2300 vs Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS

Top Six Reasons for the

Canon PowerShot A2300

Compared to Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS

anonymous
53
Lighter
Reply
125 g
vs
145 g
20 g lighter
anonymous
43
A little bit less body volume
Reply
102.84 cm³
vs
110.5 cm³
7.45% less body volume
anonymous
30
Vastly longer maximum focal length
Reply
140 mm
vs
120 mm
20 mm longer maximum focal length. A longer maximum focal length allows you to focus in on a small part of a scene, and offers a narrower angle of view than shorter focal lengths.
anonymous
28
A little thinner
Reply
20.1 mm
vs
20.8 mm
0.70 mm thinner
anonymous
28
Narrower
Reply
54.2 mm
vs
56.8 mm
2.60 mm narrower
anonymous
18
Has a brand lens
Reply
Yes
vs
No
The lens is made by a reputable photographic equipment manufacturer, as opposed to a low-cost unbranded lens.

Canon PowerShot A2300 is better than Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS because...

Yes
vs
No

Top 14 Reasons for the

Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS

Compared to Canon PowerShot A2300

anonymous
88
Slightly more megapixels (photo)
Reply
16.1 MP
vs
16 MP
0.63% more megapixels (photo)
anonymous
69
Clearly faster shooting at highest resolution with AF as JPEG format
Reply
1.9 fps
vs
0.8 fps
2.37x faster shooting at highest resolution with AF as JPEG format. Fast continuous shooting is useful for catching action shots.
anonymous
65
Explicitly higher maximum light sensitivity
Reply
3200 ISO
vs
1600 ISO
2x higher maximum light sensitivity. With a higher light sensitivity (ISO level), the sensor absorbs more light. This can be used to capture moving objects using a fast shutter speed, or to take images in low light without using a flash.
anonymous
51
Sizably better video recording quality
Reply
1080 x 24 fps
vs
720 x 25 fps
44% better video recording quality
anonymous
47
Has a stereo microphone
Reply
Yes
vs
No
A stereo microphone allows to record audio files or movies in stereo without an external microphone.
anonymous
43
Higher pixel density
Reply
306 ppi
vs
256 ppi
19.53% higher pixel density
anonymous
42
Substantially higher resolution
Reply
784x588 px
vs
553x415 px
2.01x higher resolution
anonymous
35
Bigger screen size
Reply
3.2 "
vs
2.7 "
18.52% bigger screen size. The bigger the screen size is, the better the user experience.
anonymous
34
Has a BSI sensor
Reply
Yes
vs
No
A BSI (backside illuminated) sensor is a camera image sensor which captures better quality images in poor lighting conditions, and offers better overall sharpness and image quality.
anonymous
34
Can create panoramas in-camera
Reply
Yes
vs
No
It allows you to take multiple photos capturing different parts of the scene, and then joins them together into a single photo.
anonymous
32
Wider aperture at minimum focal length
Reply
2.7
vs
2.8
Wider aperture at minimum focal length. This is the widest aperture available at the minimum focal length. With a wider aperture the sensor can capture more light, helping to avoid blur by enabling a faster shutter speed. It also provides a shallow depth of field, allowing you to blur the background to focus attention on the subject.
anonymous
30
Has a HDMI output
Reply
Yes
vs
No
Devices with a HDMI or mini HDMI port can transfer high definition video and audio to a display.
anonymous
30
Clearly shorter minimum focal length
Reply
24 mm
vs
28 mm
4 mm shorter minimum focal length. A shorter minimum focal length allows you to get more of the scene in the photo, and offers a wider angle of view than longer focal lengths.
anonymous
26
A bit shorter
Reply
93.5 mm
vs
94.4 mm
0.90 mm shorter

Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS is better than Canon PowerShot A2300 because...

Yes
vs
No

Compare with other products

x
Join