Top Five Reasons for the Canon PowerShot A2300

Top 15 Reasons for the Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS

 
 
Which is better? Show result
0
0

Canon PowerShot A2300 vs Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS

Top Five Reasons for the

Canon PowerShot A2300

Compared to Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS

102
Lighter
Comment
125g
vs
145g
20g lighter

×

57
A bit less body volume
Comment
102.84cm³
vs
110.5cm³
7.45% less body volume

×

51
Narrower
Comment
54.2mm
vs
56.8mm
2.60mm narrower

×

49
A tad thinner
Comment
20.1mm
vs
20.8mm
0.70mm thinner

×

35
Sizably longer maximum focal length
Comment
140mm
vs
120mm
20mm longer maximum focal length. A longer maximum focal length allows you to focus in on a small part of a scene, and offers a narrower angle of view than shorter focal lengths.

×

Canon PowerShot A2300 is better than Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS because...

Yes
vs
No

Please choose the related object

Top 15 Reasons for the

Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS

Compared to Canon PowerShot A2300

239
A shade more megapixels (photo)
Comment
16.1MP
vs
16MP
0.63% more megapixels (photo)

×

128
Distinctly faster shooting at highest resolution with AF as JPEG format
Comment
1.9fps
vs
0.8fps
2.37x faster shooting at highest resolution with AF as JPEG format. Fast continuous shooting is useful for catching action shots.

×

95
Noticeably higher maximum light sensitivity
Comment
3200ISO
vs
1600ISO
2x higher maximum light sensitivity. With a higher light sensitivity (ISO level), the sensor absorbs more light. This can be used to capture moving objects using a fast shutter speed, or to take images in low light without using a flash.

×

87
Sizably better video recording quality
Comment
1080 x 24fps
vs
720 x 25fps
44% better video recording quality

×

69
Has a stereo microphone
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A stereo microphone allows to record audio files or movies in stereo without an external microphone.

×

67
Higher pixel density
Comment
306ppi
vs
256ppi
19.53% higher pixel density

×

60
Explicitly higher resolution
Comment
784x588px
vs
553x415px
2.01x higher resolution

×

56
A tad shorter
Comment
93.5mm
vs
94.4mm
0.90mm shorter

×

45
Can create panoramas in-camera
Comment
Yes
vs
No
It allows you to take multiple photos capturing different parts of the scene, and then joins them together into a single photo.

×

43
Has a BSI sensor
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A BSI (backside illuminated) sensor is a camera image sensor which captures better quality images in poor lighting conditions, and offers better overall sharpness and image quality.

×

42
Bigger screen size
Comment
3.2"
vs
2.7"
18.52% bigger screen size. The bigger the screen size is, the better the user experience.

×

37
Wider aperture at minimum focal length
Comment
2.7
vs
2.8
Wider aperture at minimum focal length. With a wider aperture the sensor can capture more light, helping to avoid blur by enabling a faster shutter speed. It also provides a shallow depth of field, allowing you to blur the background to focus attention on the subject.

×

36
Has a HDMI output
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Devices with a HDMI or mini HDMI port can transfer high definition video and audio to a display.

×

32
Appreciably shorter minimum focal length
Comment
24mm
vs
28mm
4mm shorter minimum focal length. A shorter minimum focal length allows you to get more of the scene in the photo, and offers a wider angle of view than longer focal lengths.

×

Nirmal Singh
1
It has touch screen
Comment
Yes
vs
No
No touch screen

×

Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS is better than Canon PowerShot A2300 because...

Yes
vs
No

Please choose the related object

x
Join