Top Five Reasons for the Canon PowerShot A2300

Top 15 Reasons for the Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS

 
 
Which is better? Show result
0
0

Canon PowerShot A2300 vs Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS

Top Five Reasons for the

Canon PowerShot A2300

Compared to Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS

anonymous
88
Lighter
Comment
125 g
vs
145 g
20 g lighter
anonymous
52
Marginally less body volume
Comment
102.84 cm³
vs
110.5 cm³
7.45% less body volume
anonymous
49
Narrower
Comment
54.2 mm
vs
56.8 mm
2.60 mm narrower
anonymous
41
Somewhat thinner
Comment
20.1 mm
vs
20.8 mm
0.70 mm thinner
anonymous
34
Significantly longer maximum focal length
Comment
140 mm
vs
120 mm
20 mm longer maximum focal length. A longer maximum focal length allows you to focus in on a small part of a scene, and offers a narrower angle of view than shorter focal lengths.

Canon PowerShot A2300 is better than Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS because...

Yes
vs
No

Please choose the related object

Top 15 Reasons for the

Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS

Compared to Canon PowerShot A2300

anonymous
192
Somewhat more megapixels (photo)
Comment
16.1 MP
vs
16 MP
0.63% more megapixels (photo)
anonymous
108
Substantially faster shooting at highest resolution with AF as JPEG format
Comment
1.9 fps
vs
0.8 fps
2.37x faster shooting at highest resolution with AF as JPEG format. Fast continuous shooting is useful for catching action shots.
anonymous
86
Sizably higher maximum light sensitivity
Comment
3200 ISO
vs
1600 ISO
2x higher maximum light sensitivity. With a higher light sensitivity (ISO level), the sensor absorbs more light. This can be used to capture moving objects using a fast shutter speed, or to take images in low light without using a flash.
anonymous
77
Distinctly better video recording quality
Comment
1080 x 24 fps
vs
720 x 25 fps
44% better video recording quality
anonymous
61
Has a stereo microphone
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A stereo microphone allows to record audio files or movies in stereo without an external microphone.
anonymous
57
Higher pixel density
Comment
306 ppi
vs
256 ppi
19.53% higher pixel density
anonymous
54
Clearly higher resolution
Comment
784x588 px
vs
553x415 px
2.01x higher resolution
anonymous
43
A shade shorter
Comment
93.5 mm
vs
94.4 mm
0.90 mm shorter
anonymous
42
Has a BSI sensor
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A BSI (backside illuminated) sensor is a camera image sensor which captures better quality images in poor lighting conditions, and offers better overall sharpness and image quality.
anonymous
42
Can create panoramas in-camera
Comment
Yes
vs
No
It allows you to take multiple photos capturing different parts of the scene, and then joins them together into a single photo.
anonymous
40
Bigger screen size
Comment
3.2 "
vs
2.7 "
18.52% bigger screen size. The bigger the screen size is, the better the user experience.
anonymous
36
Wider aperture at minimum focal length
Comment
2.7
vs
2.8
Wider aperture at minimum focal length. With a wider aperture the sensor can capture more light, helping to avoid blur by enabling a faster shutter speed. It also provides a shallow depth of field, allowing you to blur the background to focus attention on the subject.
anonymous
33
Has a HDMI output
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Devices with a HDMI or mini HDMI port can transfer high definition video and audio to a display.
anonymous
32
Significantly shorter minimum focal length
Comment
24 mm
vs
28 mm
4 mm shorter minimum focal length. A shorter minimum focal length allows you to get more of the scene in the photo, and offers a wider angle of view than longer focal lengths.
Nirmal Singh
1
It has touch screen
Comment
Yes
vs
No
No touch screen

Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS is better than Canon PowerShot A2300 because...

Yes
vs
No

Please choose the related object

x
Join