Download the official Versus Android app now Android app on Google Play

Canon PowerShot A2300 vs Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS

Top Six Reasons for the

Canon PowerShot A2300

Compared to Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS

anonymous
53
Lighter
125 g
vs
145 g
20 g lighter
anonymous
41
A tad less body volume
102.84 cm³
vs
110.5 cm³
7.45% less body volume
anonymous
30
Vastly longer maximum focal length
140 mm
vs
120 mm
20 mm longer maximum focal length. A longer maximum focal length allows you to focus in on a small part of a scene, and offers a narrower angle of view than shorter focal lengths.
anonymous
27
Narrower
54.2 mm
vs
56.8 mm
2.60 mm narrower
anonymous
26
Slightly thinner
20.1 mm
vs
20.8 mm
0.70 mm thinner
anonymous
18
Has a brand lens
Yes
vs
No
The lens is made by a reputable photographic equipment manufacturer, as opposed to a low-cost unbranded lens.

Canon PowerShot A2300 is better than Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS because...

Yes
vs
No

Top 14 Reasons for the

Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS

Compared to Canon PowerShot A2300

anonymous
86
Marginally more megapixels (photo)
16.1 MP
vs
16 MP
0.63% more megapixels (photo)
anonymous
67
Vastly faster shooting at highest resolution with AF as JPEG format
1.9 fps
vs
0.8 fps
2.37x faster shooting at highest resolution with AF as JPEG format. Fast continuous shooting is useful for catching action shots.
anonymous
62
Explicitly higher maximum light sensitivity
3200 ISO
vs
1600 ISO
2x higher maximum light sensitivity. With a higher light sensitivity (ISO level), the sensor absorbs more light. This can be used to capture moving objects using a fast shutter speed, or to take images in low light without using a flash.
anonymous
50
Significantly better video recording quality
1080 x 24 fps
vs
720 x 25 fps
44% better video recording quality
anonymous
47
Has a stereo microphone
Yes
vs
No
A stereo microphone allows to record audio files or movies in stereo without an external microphone.
anonymous
43
Higher pixel density
306 ppi
vs
256 ppi
19.53% higher pixel density
anonymous
41
Sizably higher resolution
784x588 px
vs
553x415 px
2.01x higher resolution
anonymous
35
Bigger screen size
3.2 "
vs
2.7 "
18.52% bigger screen size. The bigger the screen size is, the better the user experience.
anonymous
34
Has a BSI sensor
Yes
vs
No
A BSI (backside illuminated) sensor is a camera image sensor which captures better quality images in poor lighting conditions, and offers better overall sharpness and image quality.
anonymous
34
Can create panoramas in-camera
Yes
vs
No
It allows you to take multiple photos capturing different parts of the scene, and then joins them together into a single photo.
anonymous
32
Wider aperture at minimum focal length
2.7
vs
2.8
Wider aperture at minimum focal length. This is the widest aperture available at the minimum focal length. With a wider aperture the sensor can capture more light, helping to avoid blur by enabling a faster shutter speed. It also provides a shallow depth of field, allowing you to blur the background to focus attention on the subject.
anonymous
30
Has a HDMI output
Yes
vs
No
Devices with a HDMI or mini HDMI port can transfer high definition video and audio to a display.
anonymous
30
Substantially shorter minimum focal length
24 mm
vs
28 mm
4 mm shorter minimum focal length. A shorter minimum focal length allows you to get more of the scene in the photo, and offers a wider angle of view than longer focal lengths.
anonymous
26
Modestly shorter
93.5 mm
vs
94.4 mm
0.90 mm shorter

Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS is better than Canon PowerShot A2300 because...

Yes
vs
No

Compare with other products

x
Join