Loading 3D...
vs
Which is better? Show result
0
0
Dell UltraSharp U2913WM vs Asus PB278Q
Top Eight Reasons for the
Dell UltraSharp U2913WM
Compared to Asus PB278Q
30
Substantially lighter
Comment
5760 g
vs
8800 g
3040 g lighter
29
Marginally bigger screen size
Comment
29 "
vs
27 "
7.41% bigger screen size. The bigger the screen size is, the better the user experience.
28
Has a DVI connector
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Devices that have a DVI connector (usually computers and notebooks) can be connected to the TV set.
27
Has anti-glare
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Anti-glare helps to reduce the external reflections of light coming from outside the display.
27
Distinctly shorter
Comment
317 mm
vs
552.3 mm
235.30 mm shorter
27
Less shipping weight
Comment
11.4 kg
vs
12 kg
0.60 kg less shipping weight. The shipping weight gives you the information about the all package weight.
27
Significantly thinner
Comment
61.2 mm
vs
218 mm
156.80 mm thinner
24
Has LED-backlit display
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Uses LED backlighting, resulting in better image quality, more vibrant colours and richer blacks.
Dell UltraSharp U2913WM is better than Asus PB278Q because...
versus
Related Posts
Top Seven Reasons for the
Asus PB278Q
Compared to Dell UltraSharp U2913WM
37
Sizably less response time
Comment
5 ms
vs
8 ms
3 ms less response time. Response time is how long it takes for a display to change the state of pixels, in order to show new content. The less time it takes to respond, the less likely it is to blur fast-changing images.
34
Sizably lower power consumption on operation
Comment
60 W
vs
90 W
30 W lower power consumption on operation. How much power the device consumes when it's switched on.
27
Has stereo speakers
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Devices with stereo speakers deliver sound that surrounds the user from left and right side, creating a richer sound and a better experience.
26
Considerably higher resolution
Comment
2560x1440 px
vs
2560x1080 px
33.33% higher resolution
25
Substantially more HDMI ports
Comment
2
vs
1
1 more HDMI ports. More HDMI ports mean that you can simultaneously connect numerous devices, such as video game consoles and set-top boxes.
25
Has a socket for a 3.5 mm audio jack
Comment
Yes
vs
No
With a standard mini jack socket, you can use the device with most headphones.
25
Clearly narrower
Comment
643 mm
vs
699.8 mm
56.80 mm narrower