HTC One Google vs Samsung Galaxy S4 Google

Top 13 Reasons for the

HTC One Google

Compared to Samsung Galaxy S4 Google

anonymous
678
A shade higher pixel density
469 ppi
vs
441 ppi
6.35% higher pixel density
anonymous
323
Every pixel has three subpixels
Yes
vs
No
The device has a display with three full subpixels per pixel, resulting in a sharp and crisp picture. Pixels in some displays (like AMOLED) share one subpixel to preserve space. This can result in a less crisp, slightly blurred image.
anonymous
269
Has built-in optical image stabilization
Yes
vs
No
Optical image stabilization uses gyroscopic sensors to detect vibrations of the camera. The lens and / or sensor move in response, adjusting the optical path. This ensures that any motion is corrected before the sensor captures the image.
anonymous
268
Has stereo speakers
Yes
vs
No
Devices with stereo speakers deliver sound that surrounds the user from left and right side, creating a richer sound and a better experience.
anonymous
155
Appreciably more internal storage
32 GB
vs
16 GB
16 GB more internal storage
anonymous
144
Wider aperture at minimum focal length
2
vs
2.2
Wider aperture at minimum focal length. This is the widest aperture available at the minimum focal length. With a wider aperture the sensor can capture more light, helping to avoid blur by enabling a faster shutter speed. It also provides a shallow depth of field, allowing you to blur the background to focus attention on the subject.
anonymous
130
Has a radio
Yes
vs
No
It works as an FM radio with included headsets
anonymous
109
Has an IPS screen
Yes
vs
No
IPS (In-Plane Switching) is a technology used for LCDs. It was designed to overcome the main limitations of normal TFTs TN-matrices: relatively slow response times, small viewing angles and low quality color reproduction.
anonymous
69
Substantially higher maximum light sensitivity
1600 ISO
vs
800 ISO
2x higher maximum light sensitivity. With a higher light sensitivity (ISO level), the sensor absorbs more light. This can be used to capture moving objects using a fast shutter speed, or to take images in low light without using a flash.
anonymous
64
Sizably lower SAR for body (USA)
0.69 W/kg
vs
1.55 W/kg
0.86 W/kg lower SAR for body (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at hip level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.
anonymous
43
Supports slow motion video recording
Yes
vs
No
Victor Gtz
1
Has Gorilla 2 Glass
Yes
vs
No
Damage resistant!
Victor Gtz
-1
Sound BEATS AUDIO
Yes
vs
No
It has speakers of Beats brand
anonymous
-350
A shade narrower
68.2 mm
vs
69.8 mm
1.60 mm narrower

HTC One Google is better than Samsung Galaxy S4 Google because...

Yes
vs
No

Top 14 Reasons for the

Samsung Galaxy S4 Google

Compared to HTC One Google

anonymous
1081
More battery power
2600 mAh
vs
2300 mAh
13.04% more battery power
anonymous
846
Faster CPU clock speed
4 x 1.9 GHz
vs
4 x 1.7 GHz
11.76% faster CPU clock speed
anonymous
521
Noticeably more megapixels (photo)
13 MP
vs
4 MP
3.25x more megapixels (photo)
anonymous
476
A bit bigger screen size
5 "
vs
4.7 "
6.38% bigger screen size. The bigger the screen size is, the better the user experience.
anonymous
450
Has an external memory slot
Yes
vs
No
The device has a standard memory slot (such as an SD or micro SD card slot) so that you can either extend the internal storage with affordable memory modules or you can retrieve data, such as photographs, easily from a memory card.
anonymous
247
Has a removable battery
Yes
vs
No
The battery is removable and can be replaced by the user if broken.
anonymous
186
Has fast 802.11ac WiFi connection
Yes
vs
No
802.11ac wireless works on the 5GHz frequency range. It offers higher transfer rates, improved reliability and improved power consumption. It provides advantages for gaming and HD video streaming.
anonymous
153
Wireless charging
Yes
vs
No
The manufacturer offers a branded wireless charging kit. To charge the device, you simply put it down on its charging base.
anonymous
96
Thinner
7.9 mm
vs
9.3 mm
1.40 mm thinner
anonymous
86
A little lighter
130 g
vs
143 g
13 g lighter
anonymous
56
Explicitly lower SAR for head (USA)
0.85 W/kg
vs
1.26 W/kg
0.41 W/kg lower SAR for head (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.
anonymous
29
Supports ANT+
Yes
vs
No
ANT+ is a wireless protocol similar to Bluetooth Smart, and is very power efficient. It is mainly used for fitness monitoring devices such as heart rate monitors and cadence sensors to connect to other devices, eg. sports watches, smartphones and cycling computers.
anonymous
-361
Less body volume
75.32 cm³
vs
87.15 cm³
15.71% less body volume
anonymous
-395
A bit shorter
136.6 mm
vs
137.4 mm
0.80 mm shorter

Samsung Galaxy S4 Google is better than HTC One Google because...

Yes
vs
No

Compare with other products

x
Join