Download the official Versus Android app now Android app on Google Play

HTC One Max vs Samsung Galaxy Note 3

Top 14 Reasons for the

HTC One Max

Compared to Samsung Galaxy Note 3

anonymous
2204
A little bit more battery power
Comment
3300 mAh
vs
3200 mAh
3.13% more battery power
anonymous
1096
A tad bigger screen size
Comment
5.9 "
vs
5.7 "
3.51% bigger screen size. The bigger the screen size is, the better the user experience.
anonymous
715
More megapixel (photo, front camera)
Comment
2.1 MP
vs
2 MP
5% more megapixel (photo, front camera)
anonymous
628
Every pixel has three subpixels
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The device has a display with three full subpixels per pixel, resulting in a sharp and crisp picture. Pixels in some displays (like AMOLED) share one subpixel to preserve space. This can result in a less crisp, slightly blurred image.
anonymous
509
Has stereo speakers
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Devices with stereo speakers deliver sound that surrounds the user from left and right side, creating a richer sound and a better experience.
anonymous
335
Has a radio
Comment
Yes
vs
No
It works as an FM radio with included headsets
anonymous
303
Has an IPS screen
Comment
Yes
vs
No
IPS (In-Plane Switching) is a technology used for LCDs. It was designed to overcome the main limitations of normal TFTs TN-matrices: relatively slow response times, small viewing angles and low quality color reproduction.
anonymous
230
Wider aperture at minimum focal length
Comment
2
vs
2.2
Wider aperture at minimum focal length. With a wider aperture the sensor can capture more light, helping to avoid blur by enabling a faster shutter speed. It also provides a shallow depth of field, allowing you to blur the background to focus attention on the subject.
anonymous
110
Has a fingerprint scanner
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The device has a fingerprint scanner which identifies the user.
anonymous
95
Noticeably higher maximum light sensitivity
Comment
1600 ISO
vs
1000 ISO
1.60x higher maximum light sensitivity. With a higher light sensitivity (ISO level), the sensor absorbs more light. This can be used to capture moving objects using a fast shutter speed, or to take images in low light without using a flash.
anonymous
41
Significantly shorter minimum focal length
Comment
28 mm
vs
31 mm
3 mm shorter minimum focal length. A shorter minimum focal length allows you to get more of the scene in the photo, and offers a wider angle of view than longer focal lengths.
Anna Maria Priolo
3
Flip case carries extra 1200mAh of battery power
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Oscar Terence
2
It has an amplifier
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The speakers have a built in amp so they are nice and loud.
Jacob Alexander Berman
0
Better quality photos from the camera
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Though the lg optimus g pro beats the HTC One man's camera on the spec sheet, when put into effect the lg optimus g pro's camera simply isn't good. It acts like a flipping camera, while the HTC One Max captures absolutely beautiful photos - everytim
Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 APQ8064T
Yes
vs
No
Top 0 Reasons for Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 APQ8064T
Qualcomm Adreno 320 (400MHz)
Yes
vs
No
Top 1 Reason for Qualcomm Adreno 320 (400MHz)
anonymous
38
Newer version of OpenVG
Comment
3
vs
1.1
Newer version of OpenVG. OpenVG is used to improve the rendering of 2D graphics on mobile devices, for example the user interface (UI) on a smartphone.

HTC One Max is better than Samsung Galaxy Note 3 because...

Yes
vs
No

Top 25 Reasons for the

Samsung Galaxy Note 3

Compared to HTC One Max

anonymous
1681
Amply faster CPU clock speed
Comment
4 x 2.3 GHz
vs
4 x 1.7 GHz
35.29% faster CPU clock speed
anonymous
1404
A little higher pixel density
Comment
388 ppi
vs
373 ppi
4.02% higher pixel density
anonymous
1209
More RAM memory
Comment
3 GB
vs
2 GB
1 GB more RAM memory
anonymous
1002
Clearly more megapixels (photo)
Comment
13 MP
vs
4 MP
3.25x more megapixels (photo)
anonymous
538
Has a removable battery
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The battery is removable and can be replaced by the user if broken.
anonymous
409
Way lighter
Comment
168 g
vs
217 g
49 g lighter
anonymous
387
Thinner
Comment
8.3 mm
vs
10.3 mm
2 mm thinner
anonymous
353
Wireless charging
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The manufacturer offers a branded wireless charging kit. To charge the device, you simply put it down on its charging base.
anonymous
335
Vastly better video recording quality
Comment
2160 x 30 fps
vs
1080 x 30 fps
2x better video recording quality
anonymous
121
Supports ANT+
Comment
Yes
vs
No
ANT+ is a wireless protocol similar to Bluetooth Smart, and is very power efficient. It is mainly used for fitness monitoring devices such as heart rate monitors and cadence sensors to connect to other devices, eg. sports watches, smartphones and cycling computers.
anonymous
118
Higher GeekBench result
Comment
933
vs
622
Higher GeekBench result. This is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the performance of the CPU. (Source: Primate Labs, 2014)
anonymous
87
Sizably newer USB version
Comment
3
vs
2
1 newer USB version. Newer USB versions are faster and have better power management.
anonymous
69
Substantially faster Internet browser (Browsermark 2.0)
Comment
3297
vs
2243
46.99% faster Internet browser (Browsermark 2.0)
anonymous
43
Sizably longer maximum focal length
Comment
31 mm
vs
28 mm
3 mm longer maximum focal length. A longer maximum focal length allows you to focus in on a small part of a scene, and offers a narrower angle of view than shorter focal lengths.
Austin Green
1
Has an S pen
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Only notes have them
anonymous
-46
Narrower
Comment
79 mm
vs
82.5 mm
3.50 mm narrower
anonymous
-126
Way less body volume
Comment
99 cm³
vs
139.6 cm³
41.01% less body volume
anonymous
-141
Shorter
Comment
151.2 mm
vs
164.5 mm
13.30 mm shorter
Android 4.4 KitKat (API level 19)
Yes
vs
No
Top 1 Reason for Android 4.4 KitKat (API level 19)
Karthik Thangavelu
9
Has Google now which is better than SIRI
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420
Yes
vs
No
Top 4 Reasons for Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420
anonymous
83
Measurably higher ram speed
Comment
933 MHz
vs
600 MHz
333 MHz higher ram speed. It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.
anonymous
49
Appreciably more memory bandwidth
Comment
14.9 GB/s
vs
12.8 GB/s
2.10 GB/s more memory bandwidth. This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.
anonymous
32
Uses big.LITTLE technology
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Using big.LITTLE technology, a chip can switch between two sets of processor cores in order to maximise performance and battery life. For example, when playing a game the more powerful cores will be used to increase performance, whereas checking email will use the less powerful cores to maximise battery life.
anonymous
29
Uses HMP
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Heterogeneous Multi-Processing (HMP) is a more advanced version of big.LITTLE technology. In this setup, a processor can utilise all cores at the same time, or just a single core for low-intensity tasks. This can provide powerful performance or increased battery life respectively.
ARM Mali T628 MP6
Yes
vs
No
Top 2 Reasons for ARM Mali T628 MP6
anonymous
105
Significantly faster GPU clock speed
Comment
533 MHz
vs
400 MHz
133 MHz faster GPU clock speed. The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.
anonymous
64
Substantially higher floating-point performance
Comment
0.102 TFLOPS
vs
0.057 TFLOPS
0.04 TFLOPS higher floating-point performance. Floating-point performance is a measurement of the raw processing power of the GPU.

Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is better than HTC One Max because...

Yes
vs
No

Compare with other products

x
Join