Top Six Reasons for the Motorola MOTOLUXE

Top 17 Reasons for the Sony Xperia J

 
 
Which is better? Show result
0
0

Embed this comparison:

Motorola MOTOLUXE vs Sony Xperia J

Top Six Reasons for the

Motorola MOTOLUXE

Compared to Sony Xperia J

anonymous
1621
Sizably more megapixels (photo)
Comment
8 MP
vs
5 MP
1.60x more megapixels (photo)
anonymous
891
A little bit lighter
Comment
123.6 g
vs
124 g
0.40 g lighter
anonymous
277
A little bit narrower
Comment
60.5 mm
vs
61 mm
0.50 mm narrower
anonymous
255
Appreciably more microphone(s)
Comment
2
vs
1
1 more microphone(s). More microphones result in better sound quality and enable the device to filter out background noise.
anonymous
216
Shorter
Comment
117.7 mm
vs
124.3 mm
6.60 mm shorter
anonymous
198
A tad faster uploads
Comment
5.8 MBits/s
vs
5.76 MBits/s
0.69% faster uploads

Motorola MOTOLUXE is better than Sony Xperia J because...

Yes
vs
No

Please choose the related object

Top 17 Reasons for the

Sony Xperia J

Compared to Motorola MOTOLUXE

anonymous
3268
More battery power
Comment
1750 mAh
vs
1400 mAh
25% more battery power
anonymous
2661
Faster CPU clock speed
Comment
1 x 1 GHz
vs
1 x 0.8 GHz
25% faster CPU clock speed
anonymous
822
Has stereo speakers
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Devices with stereo speakers deliver sound that surrounds the user from left and right side, creating a richer sound and a better experience.
anonymous
755
Modestly thinner
Comment
9.2 mm
vs
9.9 mm
0.70 mm thinner
anonymous
638
Notably more internal storage
Comment
4 GB
vs
1 GB
3 GB more internal storage
anonymous
261
Has continuous autofocus when recording movies
Comment
Yes
vs
No
When recording movies they stay focussed and sharp.
anonymous
124
Vastly lower SAR for body (USA)
Comment
0.5 W/kg
vs
1.13 W/kg
0.63 W/kg lower SAR for body (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at hip level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.
anonymous
109
Appreciably lower SAR for head (USA)
Comment
0.63 W/kg
vs
1.17 W/kg
0.54 W/kg lower SAR for head (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.
anonymous
99
Has touch autofocus
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The autofocus is immediately set to the subject by just touching it on the touch screen.
anonymous
59
Less body volume
Comment
69.76 cm³
vs
80.3 cm³
15.11% less body volume
anonymous
40
Can create panoramas in-camera
Comment
Yes
vs
No
It allows you to take multiple photos capturing different parts of the scene, and then joins them together into a single photo.
Android 4.1 Jelly Bean (API level 16)
Yes
vs
No
Top 6 Reasons for Android 4.1 Jelly Bean (API level 16)
anonymous
403
The browser has word wrap
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The web browser has automatic word wrap when zooming, the user can easily read long lines without scrolling horizontally.
anonymous
278
Has offline voice recognition
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Offline voice recognition enables you to perform voice actions, like dictating texts or using various voice commands, without an internet connection.
anonymous
116
Supports bookmarks sync across different devices
Comment
Yes
vs
No
anonymous
89
You can customize your notifications, e.g. turn off notifications on an app specific basis
Comment
Yes
vs
No
anonymous
58
You can take a screenshot of your phone's screen
Comment
Yes
vs
No

Sony Xperia J is better than Motorola MOTOLUXE because...

Yes
vs
No

Please choose the related object

x
Join