Nikon D3200 vs Canon EOS M

Top Eleven Reasons for the

Nikon D3200

Compared to Canon EOS M

anonymous
54
Clearly more megapixels (photo)
24.7 MP
vs
18 MP
37.22% more megapixels (photo)
anonymous
50
Way larger sensor
15.4 x 23.2 mm
vs
22.3 x 14.9 mm
7.53% larger sensor. The larger the sensor the more light the sensor captures yielding in better image quality.
anonymous
38
Has a 24p cinema mode
Yes
vs
No
24p is a video format (24 frames per second) traditionally used in cinema. Nowadays, it is used to create film-like motion characteristics.
anonymous
32
Has AF tracking
Yes
vs
No
With AF tracking, once you choose the subject and press the shutter release part way down, as the subject moves, the autofocus will follow it. No more out of focus shots.
anonymous
30
Has a flash
Yes
vs
No
A flash is good for low-light environments, and can sometimes be used as flashlight.
anonymous
30
Has an optical viewfinder
Yes
vs
No
An optical viewfinder (or OVF) allows the photographer to compose a shot while seeing exactly what the lens sees. There is no time lag and they require no power - as opposed to electronic viewfinders which can drain battery life. They are also better in low light situations.
anonymous
29
Has a HDMI output
Yes
vs
No
Devices with a HDMI or mini HDMI port can transfer high definition video and audio to a display.
anonymous
28
More lenses available
169
vs
162
7 more lenses available. A bigger variety of brand lenses means that you have more options and can find one that suits your needs.
anonymous
28
Has manual shutter speed
Yes
vs
No
This allows to manually set the shutter speed.
anonymous
14
Reasonably shorter
96 mm
vs
108.6 mm
12.60 mm shorter
Elti Vlore
2
Has GPS
Yes
vs
No
The D3200 is compatible with GP-1 GPS Unit that is able to embed location information on an image. Latitude, longitude and altitude of a shooting location are recorded as Exif data.
Vinay Panwar
0
Vinay panwar
Yes
vs
No
Rohan Bhanushali
0
Product service
Yes
vs
No
More By Nikon less By Canon
Christina Marie Higgins
-1
More lens choces
Yes
vs
No
Nikone offers more options for lenses where canon fails in this category.

Nikon D3200 is better than Canon EOS M because...

Yes
vs
No

Top Eleven Reasons for the

Canon EOS M

Compared to Nikon D3200

anonymous
53
Notably more focus points
31
vs
11
20 more focus points. The more focus points the more flexibility in picking which part of the scene to focus on. They also give the image sensor a better probability in identifying the right area of the scene to focus on in more automatic modes.
anonymous
44
Plenty faster shooting at highest resolution with AF as JPEG format
4.3 fps
vs
4 fps
7.50% faster shooting at highest resolution with AF as JPEG format. Fast continuous shooting is useful for catching action shots.
anonymous
42
Sizably higher maximum light sensitivity
25600 ISO
vs
12800 ISO
2x higher maximum light sensitivity. With a higher light sensitivity (ISO level), the sensor absorbs more light. This can be used to capture moving objects using a fast shutter speed, or to take images in low light without using a flash.
anonymous
37
Slightly higher pixel density
501 ppi
vs
471 ppi
6.37% higher pixel density
anonymous
37
Sizably lighter
298 g
vs
455 g
157 g lighter
anonymous
36
Considerably higher resolution
1250x833 px
vs
1176x784 px
12.94% higher resolution
anonymous
35
Has a stereo microphone
Yes
vs
No
A stereo microphone allows to record audio files or movies in stereo without an external microphone.
anonymous
27
Has a touch screen
Yes
vs
No
You can operate the device easily, by pressing the screen with your fingers.
anonymous
26
Has branded damage resistant glass
Yes
vs
No
Damage resistant glass (such as Corning Gorilla Glass or Asahi Dragontail Glass) is thin and lightweight, and can withstand high levels of force.
anonymous
15
Measurably thinner
32.3 mm
vs
76.5 mm
44.20 mm thinner
anonymous
14
Considerably narrower
66.5 mm
vs
125 mm
58.50 mm narrower

Canon EOS M is better than Nikon D3200 because...

Yes
vs
No

Compare with other products

x
Join