Top 42 Reasons for the Nokia Lumia 920

Top 22 Reasons for the Motorola Moto G

 
 
Which is better? Show result
0
0

Nokia Lumia 920 vs Motorola Moto G

Top 42 Reasons for the

Nokia Lumia 920

Compared to Motorola Moto G

2484
A little higher pixel density
Comment
332ppi
vs
329ppi
0.91% higher pixel density

×

1781
Sizably more megapixels (photo)
Comment
8.7MP
vs
5MP
1.74x more megapixels (photo)

×

1675
Much higher resolution
Comment
1280x768px
vs
1280x720px
6.67% higher resolution

×

903
Has stereo speakers
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Devices with stereo speakers deliver sound that surrounds the user from left and right side, creating a richer sound and a better experience.

×

886
A tad thinner
Comment
10.7mm
vs
11.6mm
0.90mm thinner

×

825
Has built-in optical image stabilization
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Optical image stabilization uses gyroscopic sensors to detect vibrations of the camera. The lens and / or sensor move in response, adjusting the optical path. This ensures that any motion is corrected before the sensor captures the image.

×

725
Vastly more internal storage
Comment
32GB
vs
16GB
16GB more internal storage

×

667
Sizably faster downloads
Comment
100MBits/s
vs
21MBits/s
4.76x faster downloads

×

663
Wireless charging
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The manufacturer offers a branded wireless charging kit. To charge the device, you simply put it down on its charging base.

×

633
Direct updates by OS vendor
Comment
Yes
vs
No
It can be updated directly by the OS vendor, so no need to wait until the manufacturer or network provider releases an update.

×

587
Is DLNA certified
Comment
Yes
vs
No
All DLNA certified products are compatible with one another. When different devices are connected to the same network, data can be transferred easily between them.

×

564
Has a dedicated camera button
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A dedicated camera button allows you to take snapshots more easily.

×

549
Measurably better video recording quality
Comment
1080 x 30fps
vs
720 x 30fps
1.50x better video recording quality

×

478
Has NFC
Comment
Yes
vs
No
NFC (near field communication) allows a device to perform simple wireless transactions.

×

447
Has a dual-LED flash
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A dual-led flash has led lights with different color temperatures, delivering a better color balance to photos and videos.

×

386
Has a two-stage shutter
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A two-stage shutter is good for taking photos like a pro; apply pressure to the button in order for the lens to focus, and then press it fully to capture the photograph.

×

314
Has a BSI sensor
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A BSI (backside illuminated) sensor is a camera image sensor which captures better quality images in poor lighting conditions, and offers better overall sharpness and image quality.

×

292
Appreciably more microphone(s)
Comment
3
vs
2
1 more microphone(s). More microphones result in better sound quality and enable the device to filter out background noise.

×

270
Has a video light
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A video light helps when recording a movie in low-light situation like a party.

×

222
Has a CMOS sensor
Comment
Yes
vs
No
CMOS image sensors are slowly replacing CCD sensors, due to reduced power consumption and better image quality. They can be very compact and cost relatively little to produce.

×

219
Measurably faster uploads
Comment
50MBits/s
vs
5.76MBits/s
8.68x faster uploads

×

213
Has manual ISO
Comment
Yes
vs
No
This allows to manually set the ISO level.

×

134
Noticeably lower SAR for body (USA)
Comment
0.91W/kg
vs
1.06W/kg
0.15W/kg lower SAR for body (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at hip level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.

×

112
Way lower SAR for head (USA)
Comment
1.08W/kg
vs
1.17W/kg
0.09W/kg lower SAR for head (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.

×

99
A little less body volume
Comment
98.71cm³
vs
99.3cm³
0.60% less body volume

×

96
Significantly lower SAR for head (EU)
Comment
0.7W/kg
vs
0.79W/kg
0.09W/kg lower SAR for head (EU). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 2.0 W/kg in the EU.

×

Show more reasons
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960
Yes
vs
No
Top 1 Reason for Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960
328
Has integrated LTE
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The system on a chip (SoC) has an integrated LTE cellular chip. LTE is capable of downloading at faster speeds than older, 3G technology.

×

Qualcomm Adreno 225
Yes
vs
No
Top 2 Reasons for Qualcomm Adreno 225
197
Measurably higher floating-point performance
Comment
0.0288TFLOPS
vs
0.0216TFLOPS
0.01TFLOPS higher floating-point performance. Floating-point performance is a measurement of the raw processing power of the GPU.

×

121
Substantially higher pixel rate
Comment
2.4GPixel/s
vs
0.8GPixel/s
1.60GPixel/s higher pixel rate. The number of pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.

×

Qualcomm Krait
Yes
vs
No
Top 3 Reasons for Qualcomm Krait
104
Supports hardware-assisted virtualization
Comment
Yes
vs
No
It is easier to obtain better performance when using virtualization if it is hardware-assisted.

×

98
Distinctly wider front-end
Comment
3
vs
2
1 wider front-end. The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better

×

66
Sizably more bits executed at a time
Comment
128
vs
64
64 more bits executed at a time. NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.

×

Windows Phone 8
Yes
vs
No
Top 6 Reasons for Windows Phone 8
143
Has a child lock
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A child lock enables adults to prevent or restrict children’s use of the device.

×

110
Has turn by turn directions
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The device will signal upcoming turns and prepare you, ensuring you stay on route.

×

Rupal Totale
19
Has a btter touch
Comment
Yes
vs
No

×

Vincent Wansink
15
Is a drive in file explorer when plugged into PC
Comment
Yes
vs
No
When you plug your phone into the PC using USB it shows up as a drive in file explorer so you can easily copy files to and from the phone without needing to use an app like iTunes.

×

Josua Hutapea
11
Has Metro UI
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Metro UI is a Windows Phone 8 UI which offer us "rectangles theme" who other OS doesn't have it.

×

Josua Hutapea
10
Has an Xbox Music Artist Background
Comment
Yes
vs
No
It will makes your Music Player become more beautifull

×

Nokia Lumia 920 is better than Motorola Moto G because...

Yes
vs
No

Please choose the related object

Top 22 Reasons for the

Motorola Moto G

Compared to Nokia Lumia 920

3624
A little bit more battery power
Comment
2070mAh
vs
2000mAh
3.50% more battery power

×

2933
Significantly faster CPU clock speed
Comment
4 x 1.2GHz
vs
2 x 1.5GHz
1.60x faster CPU clock speed

×

1045
A lot lighter
Comment
143g
vs
185g
42g lighter

×

659
Has a radio
Comment
Yes
vs
No
It works as an FM radio with included headsets

×

370
Way narrower
Comment
65.9mm
vs
70.8mm
4.90mm narrower

×

296
Slightly shorter
Comment
129.9mm
vs
130.3mm
0.40mm shorter

×

Mauro Gomez
9
Led de notificaciones
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Tiene led de notificaciones, bastabte util, pero limitado al color blanco

×

Harutyun Rehanyan
3
Battery lasts three days!
Comment
Yes
vs
No
One day at 98% battery I turned on the battery saver for the Moto G, and for the next three days (I gamed on it for about 1 hour a day and about 30 minutes of call per day) but of course I turned it off before going to bed and turned it on in mornin

×

Gautham Krishna K
3
Cheap but effecient
Comment
Yes
vs
No
It goes off on a very reasonable price but has incredible specs

×

Oriah Robichaud
1
User removable back
Comment
Yes
vs
No
If the back gets dirty or cracked its very easy to remove and replace

×

Bharath Karthikeyan
1
Bit faster
Comment
Yes
vs
No
First gen moto g is faster than second gen

×

Android 4.4 KitKat (API level 19)
Yes
vs
No
Top 7 Reasons for Android 4.4 KitKat (API level 19)
761
Supports 4K resolution
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Allows you to view in ultra-high definition.

×

433
The browser has word wrap
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The web browser has automatic word wrap when zooming, the user can easily read long lines without scrolling horizontally.

×

316
Supports OpenGL ES 3.0, allowing for improved game graphics
Comment
Yes
vs
No

×

313
Is free and open source
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Anyone is free to use, copy, study, and change the software in any way, and the source code is openly shared so that people are encouraged to voluntarily improve the design of the software.

×

276
Supports Java
Comment
Yes
vs
No

×

133
Sizably more apps available
Comment
1000000
vs
300000
3.33x more apps available

×

Otto Werse
0
Has turn by turn directions
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Google Navigator is a great turn-by-turn navigation app, standard on all Android phones.

×

Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8226 (1.2GHz)
Yes
vs
No
Top 1 Reason for Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8226 (1.2GHz)
162
Distinctly more CPU threads
Comment
4
vs
2
2 more CPU threads. More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.

×

ARM Cortex-A7
Yes
vs
No
Top 1 Reason for ARM Cortex-A7
48
Vastly newer version of VFP
Comment
4
vs
3
1 newer version of VFP. Vector Floating-Point (VFP) is used by the processor to deliver increased performance in areas such as digital imaging.

×

Qualcomm Adreno 305
Yes
vs
No
Top 2 Reasons for Qualcomm Adreno 305
334
Sizably faster GPU clock speed
Comment
450MHz
vs
400MHz
50MHz faster GPU clock speed. The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.

×

78
Newer version of OpenVG
Comment
3
vs
1.1
Newer version of OpenVG. OpenVG is used to improve the rendering of 2D graphics on mobile devices, for example the user interface (UI) on a smartphone.

×

Motorola Moto G is better than Nokia Lumia 920 because...

Yes
vs
No

Please choose the related object

x
Join