Top 42 Reasons for the Nokia Lumia 920

Top 23 Reasons for the Motorola Moto G

 
 
Which is better? Show result
0
0

Embed this comparison:

Nokia Lumia 920 vs Motorola Moto G

Top 42 Reasons for the

Nokia Lumia 920

Compared to Motorola Moto G

2378
A little higher pixel density
Comment
332 ppi
vs
329 ppi
0.91% higher pixel density

×

1712
Appreciably more megapixels (photo)
Comment
8.7 MP
vs
5 MP
1.74x more megapixels (photo)

×

1612
Reasonably higher resolution
Comment
1280x768 px
vs
1280x720 px
6.67% higher resolution

×

864
Has stereo speakers
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Devices with stereo speakers deliver sound that surrounds the user from left and right side, creating a richer sound and a better experience.

×

820
A bit thinner
Comment
10.7 mm
vs
11.6 mm
0.90 mm thinner

×

803
Has built-in optical image stabilization
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Optical image stabilization uses gyroscopic sensors to detect vibrations of the camera. The lens and / or sensor move in response, adjusting the optical path. This ensures that any motion is corrected before the sensor captures the image.

×

693
Appreciably more internal storage
Comment
32 GB
vs
16 GB
16 GB more internal storage

×

646
Notably faster downloads
Comment
100 MBits/s
vs
21 MBits/s
4.76x faster downloads

×

635
Wireless charging
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The manufacturer offers a branded wireless charging kit. To charge the device, you simply put it down on its charging base.

×

624
Direct updates by OS vendor
Comment
Yes
vs
No
It can be updated directly by the OS vendor, so no need to wait until the manufacturer or network provider releases an update.

×

562
Is DLNA certified
Comment
Yes
vs
No
All DLNA certified products are compatible with one another. When different devices are connected to the same network, data can be transferred easily between them.

×

551
Has a dedicated camera button
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A dedicated camera button allows you to take snapshots more easily.

×

525
Appreciably better video recording quality
Comment
1080 x 30 fps
vs
720 x 30 fps
1.50x better video recording quality

×

453
Has NFC
Comment
Yes
vs
No
NFC (near field communication) allows a device to perform simple wireless transactions.

×

426
Has a dual-LED flash
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A dual-led flash has led lights with different color temperatures, delivering a better color balance to photos and videos.

×

376
Has a two-stage shutter
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A two-stage shutter is good for taking photos like a pro; apply pressure to the button in order for the lens to focus, and then press it fully to capture the photograph.

×

301
Has a BSI sensor
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A BSI (backside illuminated) sensor is a camera image sensor which captures better quality images in poor lighting conditions, and offers better overall sharpness and image quality.

×

275
Clearly more microphone(s)
Comment
3
vs
2
1 more microphone(s). More microphones result in better sound quality and enable the device to filter out background noise.

×

259
Has a video light
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A video light helps when recording a movie in low-light situation like a party.

×

212
Has a CMOS sensor
Comment
Yes
vs
No
CMOS image sensors are slowly replacing CCD sensors, due to reduced power consumption and better image quality. They can be very compact and cost relatively little to produce.

×

209
Has manual ISO
Comment
Yes
vs
No
This allows to manually set the ISO level.

×

208
Significantly faster uploads
Comment
50 MBits/s
vs
5.76 MBits/s
8.68x faster uploads

×

129
Substantially lower SAR for body (USA)
Comment
0.91 W/kg
vs
1.06 W/kg
0.15 W/kg lower SAR for body (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at hip level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.

×

112
Way lower SAR for head (USA)
Comment
1.08 W/kg
vs
1.17 W/kg
0.09 W/kg lower SAR for head (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.

×

94
Significantly lower SAR for head (EU)
Comment
0.7 W/kg
vs
0.79 W/kg
0.09 W/kg lower SAR for head (EU). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 2.0 W/kg in the EU.

×

78
Somewhat less body volume
Comment
98.71 cm³
vs
99.3 cm³
0.60% less body volume

×

Show more reasons
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960
Yes
vs
No
Top 1 Reason for Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960
311
Has integrated LTE
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The system on a chip (SoC) has an integrated LTE cellular chip. LTE is capable of downloading at faster speeds than older, 3G technology.

×

Qualcomm Adreno 225
Yes
vs
No
Top 2 Reasons for Qualcomm Adreno 225
190
Clearly higher floating-point performance
Comment
0.0288 TFLOPS
vs
0.0216 TFLOPS
0.01 TFLOPS higher floating-point performance. Floating-point performance is a measurement of the raw processing power of the GPU.

×

119
Clearly higher pixel rate
Comment
2.4 GPixel/s
vs
0.8 GPixel/s
1.60 GPixel/s higher pixel rate. The number of pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.

×

Qualcomm Krait
Yes
vs
No
Top 3 Reasons for Qualcomm Krait
102
Supports hardware-assisted virtualization
Comment
Yes
vs
No
It is easier to obtain better performance when using virtualization if it is hardware-assisted.

×

96
Distinctly wider front-end
Comment
3
vs
2
1 wider front-end. The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better

×

65
Substantially more bits executed at a time
Comment
128
vs
64
64 more bits executed at a time. NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.

×

Windows Phone 8
Yes
vs
No
Top 6 Reasons for Windows Phone 8
139
Has a child lock
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A child lock enables adults to prevent or restrict children’s use of the device.

×

105
Has turn by turn directions
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The device will signal upcoming turns and prepare you, ensuring you stay on route.

×

Rupal Totale
19
Has a btter touch
Comment
Yes
vs
No

×

Vincent Wansink
15
Is a drive in file explorer when plugged into PC
Comment
Yes
vs
No
When you plug your phone into the PC using USB it shows up as a drive in file explorer so you can easily copy files to and from the phone without needing to use an app like iTunes.

×

Josua Hutapea
11
Has Metro UI
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Metro UI is a Windows Phone 8 UI which offer us "rectangles theme" who other OS doesn't have it.

×

Josua Hutapea
10
Has an Xbox Music Artist Background
Comment
Yes
vs
No
It will makes your Music Player become more beautifull

×

Nokia Lumia 920 is better than Motorola Moto G because...

Yes
vs
No

Please choose the related object

Top 23 Reasons for the

Motorola Moto G

Compared to Nokia Lumia 920

3481
A little more battery power
Comment
2070 mAh
vs
2000 mAh
3.50% more battery power

×

2812
Explicitly faster CPU clock speed
Comment
4 x 1.2 GHz
vs
2 x 1.5 GHz
1.60x faster CPU clock speed

×

971
Amply lighter
Comment
143 g
vs
185 g
42 g lighter

×

631
Has a radio
Comment
Yes
vs
No
It works as an FM radio with included headsets

×

331
Reasonably narrower
Comment
65.9 mm
vs
70.8 mm
4.90 mm narrower

×

256
Marginally shorter
Comment
129.9 mm
vs
130.3 mm
0.40 mm shorter

×

Mario Núñez
11
Pure Android experience
Comment
Yes
vs
No
As Google intended it to be.

×

Mauro Gomez
4
Led de notificaciones
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Tiene led de notificaciones, bastabte util, pero limitado al color blanco

×

Harutyun Rehanyan
3
Battery lasts three days!
Comment
Yes
vs
No
One day at 98% battery I turned on the battery saver for the Moto G, and for the next three days (I gamed on it for about 1 hour a day and about 30 minutes of call per day) but of course I turned it off before going to bed and turned it on in mornin

×

Gautham Krishna K
3
Cheap but effecient
Comment
Yes
vs
No
It goes off on a very reasonable price but has incredible specs

×

Oriah Robichaud
1
User removable back
Comment
Yes
vs
No
If the back gets dirty or cracked its very easy to remove and replace

×

Bharath Karthikeyan
1
Bit faster
Comment
Yes
vs
No
First gen moto g is faster than second gen

×

Android 4.4 KitKat (API level 19)
Yes
vs
No
Top 7 Reasons for Android 4.4 KitKat (API level 19)
733
Supports 4K resolution
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Allows you to view in ultra-high definition.

×

423
The browser has word wrap
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The web browser has automatic word wrap when zooming, the user can easily read long lines without scrolling horizontally.

×

307
Supports OpenGL ES 3.0, allowing for improved game graphics
Comment
Yes
vs
No

×

305
Is free and open source
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Anyone is free to use, copy, study, and change the software in any way, and the source code is openly shared so that people are encouraged to voluntarily improve the design of the software.

×

268
Supports Java
Comment
Yes
vs
No

×

132
Explicitly more apps available
Comment
1000000
vs
300000
3.33x more apps available

×

Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8226 (1.2GHz)
Yes
vs
No
Top 1 Reason for Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8226 (1.2GHz)
155
Clearly more CPU threads
Comment
4
vs
2
2 more CPU threads. More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.

×

ARM Cortex-A7
Yes
vs
No
Top 1 Reason for ARM Cortex-A7
48
Significantly newer version of VFP
Comment
4
vs
3
1 newer version of VFP. Vector Floating-Point (VFP) is used by the processor to deliver increased performance in areas such as digital imaging.

×

Qualcomm Adreno 305
Yes
vs
No
Top 2 Reasons for Qualcomm Adreno 305
321
Vastly faster GPU clock speed
Comment
450 MHz
vs
400 MHz
50 MHz faster GPU clock speed. The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.

×

74
Newer version of OpenVG
Comment
3
vs
1.1
Newer version of OpenVG. OpenVG is used to improve the rendering of 2D graphics on mobile devices, for example the user interface (UI) on a smartphone.

×

Motorola Moto G is better than Nokia Lumia 920 because...

Yes
vs
No

Please choose the related object

x
Join