Top Nine Reasons for the Nvidia GeForce GTX 760

Top 23 Reasons for the EVGA GTX 680 Classified

 
 
Which is better? Show result
0
0

Nvidia GeForce GTX 760 vs EVGA GTX 680 Classified

Top Nine Reasons for the

Nvidia GeForce GTX 760

Compared to EVGA GTX 680 Classified

48
Clearly lower TDP
Comment
170W
vs
195W
25W lower TDP. The thermal design power (TDP) is the maximum amount of power the cooling system needs to dissipate. A lower TDP typically means that it consumes less power.

×

37
A tad more memory bandwidth
Comment
192.2GB/s
vs
192GB/s
0.20GB/s more memory bandwidth. This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.

×

31
Lower idle GPU temperature
Comment
31°C
vs
32°C
1°C lower idle GPU temperature. A lower idle temperature means that the card produces less heat and its cooling system performs better.

×

31
A bit shorter
Comment
111mm
vs
112mm
1mm shorter

×

31
Lower load noise level
Comment
50dB
vs
51.9dB
1.90dB lower load noise level. The level of noise when under a heavy workload.

×

31
A lot lower power consumption whilst under peak load
Comment
336W
vs
362W
26W lower power consumption whilst under peak load

×

31
Vastly narrower
Comment
241mm
vs
267mm
26mm narrower

×

29
Lower power consumption whilst idle
Comment
108W
vs
112W
4W lower power consumption whilst idle

×

28
A bit higher Crysis: Warhead (2560x1600) result
Comment
31.6FPS
vs
31.3FPS
0.30FPS higher Crysis: Warhead (2560x1600) result. This benchmark measures the performance of the graphics card using Crysis: Warhead (2560x1600 - Frost Bench - Enthusiast Quality + 4xAA). Source: AnandTech.

×

Nvidia GeForce GTX 760 is better than EVGA GTX 680 Classified because...

Yes
vs
No

Please choose the related object

Top 23 Reasons for the

EVGA GTX 680 Classified

Compared to Nvidia GeForce GTX 760

EVGA GeForce GTX 680 Classified
Yes
vs
No
Top 23 Reasons for EVGA GeForce GTX 680 Classified
334
Vastly faster GPU clock speed
Comment
1110MHz
vs
980MHz
130MHz faster GPU clock speed. The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.

×

197
Sizably higher floating-point performance
Comment
3.41TFLOPS
vs
2.258TFLOPS
1.15TFLOPS higher floating-point performance. Floating-point performance is a measurement of the raw processing power of the GPU.

×

121
Notably higher pixel rate
Comment
35.5GPixel/s
vs
23.5GPixel/s
12GPixel/s higher pixel rate. The number of pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.

×

44
Explicitly more shading units
Comment
1536
vs
1152
384 more shading units. Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors within the graphics card that are responsible for processing different aspects of the image.

×

40
Sizably higher texture rate
Comment
142GTexels/s
vs
94.1GTexels/s
47.90GTexels/s higher texture rate. The number of textured pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.

×

39
Measurably more texture mapping units (TMUs)
Comment
128
vs
96
32 more texture mapping units (TMUs). TMUs take textures and map them to the geometry of a 3D scene. More TMUs will typically mean that texture information is processed faster.

×

38
Reasonably more RAM memory
Comment
4.096GB
vs
2.048GB
2.05GB more RAM memory

×

36
Considerably higher 3DMark Vantage Texture Fill result
Comment
102.04GTexels/s
vs
82.8GTexels/s
19.24GTexels/s higher 3DMark Vantage Texture Fill result. This benchmark is designed to measure graphics performance. Source: AnandTech.

×

35
Lower load GPU temperature
Comment
78°C
vs
81°C
3°C lower load GPU temperature. A lower load temperature means that the card produces less heat and its cooling system performs better.

×

34
Way higher 3DMark Vantage Pixel Fill result
Comment
13.03GPixel/s
vs
12.3GPixel/s
0.73GPixel/s higher 3DMark Vantage Pixel Fill result. This benchmark is designed to measure graphics performance. Source: AnandTech.

×

34
Substantially faster GPU turbo speed
Comment
1176MHz
vs
1032MHz
144MHz faster GPU turbo speed. When the GPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.

×

32
Significantly higher Battlefield 3 (2560x1440) result
Comment
50.2FPS
vs
44.6FPS
5.60FPS higher Battlefield 3 (2560x1440) result. This benchmark measures the performance of the graphics card using Battlefield 3 (2560x1440 - Ultra Quality + 4x MSAA). Source: AnandTech.

×

31
Vastly higher PassMark (G3D) result
Comment
5683
vs
5053
630 higher PassMark (G3D) result. This benchmark measures the graphics performance of a video card. Source: PassMark.

×

30
Noticeably higher PassMark (DirectCompute) result
Comment
2910
vs
2433
477 higher PassMark (DirectCompute) result. This benchmark measures the general purpose computational power of a graphics card. Source: PassMark.

×

29
Significantly higher Crysis 3 result
Comment
42.6FPS
vs
37.9FPS
4.70FPS higher Crysis 3 result. This benchmark measures the performance of the graphics card using Crysis 3 (1920x1080 - Very High Quality + FXAA). Source: AnandTech.

×

28
Somewhat lower idle noise level
Comment
40.5dB
vs
41dB
0.50dB lower idle noise level. The level of noise when it is not in use.

×

27
Measurably higher Bioshock Infinite result
Comment
75.7FPS
vs
64.9FPS
10.80FPS higher Bioshock Infinite result. This benchmark measures the performance of the graphics card using Bioshock Infinite (1920x1080 - Ultra Quality + DDoF). Source: AnandTech.

×

27
Noticeably more GPUs supported
Comment
3
vs
2
1 more GPUs supported. The number of GPUs supported when using a multi-GPU configuration. Using more than one GPU in parallel can give increased performance.

×

26
Vastly higher Battlefield 3 (1920x1080) result
Comment
80.4FPS
vs
70.5FPS
9.90FPS higher Battlefield 3 (1920x1080) result. This benchmark measures the performance of the graphics card using Battlefield 3 (1920x1080 - Ultra Quality + 4x MSAA). Source: AnandTech.

×

26
A lot higher Sleeping Dogs result
Comment
82.5FPS
vs
76.7FPS
5.80FPS higher Sleeping Dogs result. This benchmark measures the performance of the graphics card using Sleeping Dogs - 1920x1080 - Ultra Quality + High AA). Source: AnandTech.

×

25
Measurably higher DiRT: Showdown result
Comment
71.6FPS
vs
57.4FPS
14.20FPS higher DiRT: Showdown result. This benchmark measures the performance of the graphics card using DiRT: Showdown (1920x1080 - Ultra Quality + 4x MSAA + Adv. Lighting). Source: AnandTech.

×

24
Sizably higher Far Cry 3 result
Comment
69.4FPS
vs
39.3FPS
30.10FPS higher Far Cry 3 result. This benchmark measures the performance of the graphics card using Far Cry 3 (1920x1080 - Ultra Quality). Source: AnandTech.

×

23
Distinctly higher Civilization V result
Comment
100.9FPS
vs
84.5FPS
16.40FPS higher Civilization V result. This benchmark measures the performance of the graphics card using Civilization V (1920x1080 - Maximum Quality + 4x MSAA). Source: AnandTech.

×

EVGA GTX 680 Classified is better than Nvidia GeForce GTX 760 because...

Yes
vs
No

Please choose the related object

x
Join