Nvidia GeForce GTX 760 vs EVGA GTX 680 Classified

Top Nine Reasons for the

Nvidia GeForce GTX 760

Compared to EVGA GTX 680 Classified

anonymous
40
Distinctly lower TDP
Comment
170 W
vs
195 W
25 W lower TDP. The thermal design power (TDP) is the maximum amount of power the cooling system needs to dissipate. A lower TDP typically means that it consumes less power.
anonymous
32
Modestly more memory bandwidth
Comment
192.2 GB/s
vs
192 GB/s
0.20 GB/s more memory bandwidth. This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.
anonymous
31
Lower idle GPU temperature
Comment
31 °C
vs
32 °C
1 °C lower idle GPU temperature. A lower idle temperature means that the card produces less heat and its cooling system performs better.
anonymous
30
Lower load noise level
Comment
50 dB
vs
51.9 dB
1.90 dB lower load noise level. The level of noise when under a heavy workload.
anonymous
30
Lots lower power consumption whilst under peak load
Comment
336 W
vs
362 W
26 W lower power consumption whilst under peak load
anonymous
29
Lower power consumption whilst idle
Comment
108 W
vs
112 W
4 W lower power consumption whilst idle
anonymous
28
A little bit higher Crysis: Warhead (2560x1600) result
Comment
31.6 FPS
vs
31.3 FPS
0.30 FPS higher Crysis: Warhead (2560x1600) result. This benchmark measures the performance of the graphics card using Crysis: Warhead (2560x1600 - Frost Bench - Enthusiast Quality + 4xAA). Source: AnandTech.
anonymous
27
Slightly shorter
Comment
111 mm
vs
112 mm
1 mm shorter
anonymous
26
Notably narrower
Comment
241 mm
vs
267 mm
26 mm narrower

Nvidia GeForce GTX 760 is better than EVGA GTX 680 Classified because...

Yes
vs
No

Top 23 Reasons for the

EVGA GTX 680 Classified

Compared to Nvidia GeForce GTX 760

EVGA GeForce GTX 680 Classified
Yes
vs
No
Top 23 Reasons for EVGA GeForce GTX 680 Classified
anonymous
220
Appreciably faster GPU clock speed
Comment
1110 MHz
vs
980 MHz
130 MHz faster GPU clock speed. The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.
anonymous
117
Noticeably higher floating-point performance
Comment
3.41 TFLOPS
vs
2.258 TFLOPS
1.15 TFLOPS higher floating-point performance. Floating-point performance is a measurement of the raw processing power of the GPU.
anonymous
77
Noticeably higher pixel rate
Comment
35.5 GPixel/s
vs
23.5 GPixel/s
12 GPixel/s higher pixel rate. The number of pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.
anonymous
39
Significantly more shading units
Comment
1536
vs
1152
384 more shading units. Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors within the graphics card that are responsible for processing different aspects of the image.
anonymous
35
Explicitly higher 3DMark Vantage Texture Fill result
Comment
102.04 GTexels/s
vs
82.8 GTexels/s
19.24 GTexels/s higher 3DMark Vantage Texture Fill result. This benchmark is designed to measure graphics performance. Source: AnandTech.
anonymous
34
Reasonably higher 3DMark Vantage Pixel Fill result
Comment
13.03 GPixel/s
vs
12.3 GPixel/s
0.73 GPixel/s higher 3DMark Vantage Pixel Fill result. This benchmark is designed to measure graphics performance. Source: AnandTech.
anonymous
34
Lower load GPU temperature
Comment
78 °C
vs
81 °C
3 °C lower load GPU temperature. A lower load temperature means that the card produces less heat and its cooling system performs better.
anonymous
34
Clearly more texture mapping units (TMUs)
Comment
128
vs
96
32 more texture mapping units (TMUs). TMUs take textures and map them to the geometry of a 3D scene. More TMUs will typically mean that texture information is processed faster.
anonymous
33
Lots more RAM memory
Comment
4.096 GB
vs
2.048 GB
2.05 GB more RAM memory
anonymous
33
Noticeably higher texture rate
Comment
142 GTexels/s
vs
94.1 GTexels/s
47.90 GTexels/s higher texture rate. The number of textured pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.
anonymous
32
Significantly higher Battlefield 3 (2560x1440) result
Comment
50.2 FPS
vs
44.6 FPS
5.60 FPS higher Battlefield 3 (2560x1440) result. This benchmark measures the performance of the graphics card using Battlefield 3 (2560x1440 - Ultra Quality + 4x MSAA). Source: AnandTech.
anonymous
32
Notably faster GPU turbo speed
Comment
1176 MHz
vs
1032 MHz
144 MHz faster GPU turbo speed. When the GPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.
anonymous
30
Noticeably higher PassMark (G3D) result
Comment
5683
vs
5053
630 higher PassMark (G3D) result. This benchmark measures the graphics performance of a video card. Source: PassMark.
anonymous
29
Explicitly higher Crysis 3 result
Comment
42.6 FPS
vs
37.9 FPS
4.70 FPS higher Crysis 3 result. This benchmark measures the performance of the graphics card using Crysis 3 (1920x1080 - Very High Quality + FXAA). Source: AnandTech.
anonymous
28
A little bit lower idle noise level
Comment
40.5 dB
vs
41 dB
0.50 dB lower idle noise level. The level of noise when it is not in use.
anonymous
28
Noticeably higher PassMark (DirectCompute) result
Comment
2910
vs
2433
477 higher PassMark (DirectCompute) result. This benchmark measures the general purpose computational power of a graphics card. Source: PassMark.
anonymous
27
Appreciably higher Bioshock Infinite result
Comment
75.7 FPS
vs
64.9 FPS
10.80 FPS higher Bioshock Infinite result. This benchmark measures the performance of the graphics card using Bioshock Infinite (1920x1080 - Ultra Quality + DDoF). Source: AnandTech.
anonymous
26
Noticeably higher Battlefield 3 (1920x1080) result
Comment
80.4 FPS
vs
70.5 FPS
9.90 FPS higher Battlefield 3 (1920x1080) result. This benchmark measures the performance of the graphics card using Battlefield 3 (1920x1080 - Ultra Quality + 4x MSAA). Source: AnandTech.
anonymous
26
Substantially more GPUs supported
Comment
3
vs
2
1 more GPUs supported. The number of GPUs supported when using a multi-GPU configuration. Using more than one GPU in parallel can give increased performance.
anonymous
26
Amply higher Sleeping Dogs result
Comment
82.5 FPS
vs
76.7 FPS
5.80 FPS higher Sleeping Dogs result. This benchmark measures the performance of the graphics card using Sleeping Dogs - 1920x1080 - Ultra Quality + High AA). Source: AnandTech.
anonymous
25
Noticeably higher DiRT: Showdown result
Comment
71.6 FPS
vs
57.4 FPS
14.20 FPS higher DiRT: Showdown result. This benchmark measures the performance of the graphics card using DiRT: Showdown (1920x1080 - Ultra Quality + 4x MSAA + Adv. Lighting). Source: AnandTech.
anonymous
24
Notably higher Far Cry 3 result
Comment
69.4 FPS
vs
39.3 FPS
30.10 FPS higher Far Cry 3 result. This benchmark measures the performance of the graphics card using Far Cry 3 (1920x1080 - Ultra Quality). Source: AnandTech.
anonymous
23
Significantly higher Civilization V result
Comment
100.9 FPS
vs
84.5 FPS
16.40 FPS higher Civilization V result. This benchmark measures the performance of the graphics card using Civilization V (1920x1080 - Maximum Quality + 4x MSAA). Source: AnandTech.

EVGA GTX 680 Classified is better than Nvidia GeForce GTX 760 because...

Yes
vs
No

Compare with other products

x
Join