Download the official Versus Android app now Android app on Google Play

Olympus Stylus Tough TG-630 iHS vs Fujifilm FinePix F500EXR

Top Eleven Reasons for the

Olympus Stylus Tough TG-630 iHS

Compared to Fujifilm FinePix F500EXR

anonymous
64
Lots lighter
Comment
167 g
vs
215 g
48 g lighter
anonymous
60
Substantially better video recording quality
Comment
1080 x 60 fps
vs
1080 x 30 fps
2x better video recording quality
anonymous
50
Modestly higher pixel density
Comment
333 ppi
vs
326 ppi
2.15% higher pixel density
anonymous
48
Is dustproof and water resistant
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Dustproof / water resistant at depth equal to or greater than 1m.
anonymous
47
A shade higher resolution
Comment
831x554 px
vs
783x587 px
0.16% higher resolution
anonymous
47
Plenty less body volume
Comment
142.01 cm³
vs
199.75 cm³
40.66% less body volume
anonymous
44
Has built-in optical image stabilization
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Optical image stabilization uses gyroscopic sensors to detect vibrations of the camera. The lens and / or sensor move in response, adjusting the optical path. This ensures that any motion is corrected before the sensor captures the image.
anonymous
36
Weather sealed
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Device is protected with extra seals to prevent failures due to any kind of weather.
anonymous
35
A shade shorter
Comment
98.4 mm
vs
103.5 mm
5.10 mm shorter
anonymous
32
Has a HDMI output
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Devices with a HDMI or mini HDMI port can transfer high definition video and audio to a display.
anonymous
30
Clearly thinner
Comment
21.9 mm
vs
32.6 mm
10.70 mm thinner

Olympus Stylus Tough TG-630 iHS is better than Fujifilm FinePix F500EXR because...

Yes
vs
No

Top 14 Reasons for the

Fujifilm FinePix F500EXR

Compared to Olympus Stylus Tough TG-630 iHS

anonymous
129
Significantly more megapixels (photo)
Comment
16 MP
vs
12 MP
33.33% more megapixels (photo)
anonymous
107
Significantly larger sensor
Comment
4.8 x 6.4 mm
vs
4.55 x 6.17 mm
9.43% larger sensor. The larger the sensor the more light the sensor captures yielding in better image quality.
anonymous
89
Substantially faster shooting at highest resolution with AF as JPEG format
Comment
12 fps
vs
5 fps
2.40x faster shooting at highest resolution with AF as JPEG format. Fast continuous shooting is useful for catching action shots.
anonymous
78
Significantly higher maximum light sensitivity
Comment
12800 ISO
vs
6400 ISO
2x higher maximum light sensitivity. With a higher light sensitivity (ISO level), the sensor absorbs more light. This can be used to capture moving objects using a fast shutter speed, or to take images in low light without using a flash.
anonymous
52
Has a stereo microphone
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A stereo microphone allows to record audio files or movies in stereo without an external microphone.
anonymous
49
A shade more battery power
Comment
1000 mAh
vs
925 mAh
8.11% more battery power
anonymous
49
Has a built-in HDR mode
Comment
Yes
vs
No
It can automatically shoot pictures with a higher dynamic range (HDR).
anonymous
38
Noticeably narrower
Comment
59.2 mm
vs
65.9 mm
6.70 mm narrower
anonymous
36
Has continuous autofocus when recording movies
Comment
Yes
vs
No
When recording movies they stay focussed and sharp.
anonymous
36
Considerably greater zoom range
Comment
15 x
vs
5 x
10 x greater zoom range. The zoom range is the ratio between the longest and shortest focal lengths. A higher zoom range means that the lens is more versatile.
anonymous
34
Wider aperture at minimum focal length
Comment
3.5
vs
3.9
Wider aperture at minimum focal length. With a wider aperture the sensor can capture more light, helping to avoid blur by enabling a faster shutter speed. It also provides a shallow depth of field, allowing you to blur the background to focus attention on the subject.
anonymous
31
Vastly longer exposure time
Comment
8 s
vs
4 s
4 s longer exposure time. When the camera shutter is open for a long time, more light is absorbed by the sensor. You can use this slow shutter speed to produce vivid night time photography, or capture the trajectory of moving objects such as motorway traffic.
anonymous
31
Significantly longer maximum focal length
Comment
360 mm
vs
140 mm
220 mm longer maximum focal length. A longer maximum focal length allows you to focus in on a small part of a scene, and offers a narrower angle of view than shorter focal lengths.
anonymous
30
Clearly shorter minimum focal length
Comment
24 mm
vs
28 mm
4 mm shorter minimum focal length. A shorter minimum focal length allows you to get more of the scene in the photo, and offers a wider angle of view than longer focal lengths.

Fujifilm FinePix F500EXR is better than Olympus Stylus Tough TG-630 iHS because...

Yes
vs
No

Compare with other products

x
Join