RIM BlackBerry Curve 9320 vs Nokia Asha 302

Top 23 Reasons for the

RIM BlackBerry Curve 9320

Compared to Nokia Asha 302

anonymous
1065
Slightly more battery power
1450 mAh
vs
1320 mAh
9.85% more battery power
anonymous
627
Clearly more RAM memory
0.5 GB
vs
0.12 GB
0.38 GB more RAM memory
anonymous
510
Slightly more megapixels (photo)
3.2 MP
vs
3.15 MP
1.59% more megapixels (photo)
anonymous
274
Direct updates by OS vendor
Yes
vs
No
It can be updated directly by the OS vendor, so no need to wait until the manufacturer or network provider releases an update.
anonymous
149
Clearly more internal storage
0.5 GB
vs
0.1 GB
0.40 GB more internal storage
anonymous
139
Vastly better video recording quality
480 x 30 fps
vs
480 x 15 fps
2x better video recording quality
anonymous
92
Slightly thinner
12.7 mm
vs
13.9 mm
1.20 mm thinner
anonymous
82
Marginally lighter
103 g
vs
106 g
3 g lighter
anonymous
64
Substantially lower SAR for body (USA)
0.75 W/kg
vs
1.01 W/kg
0.26 W/kg lower SAR for body (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at hip level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.
anonymous
63
Has a flash
Yes
vs
No
A flash is good for low-light environments, and can sometimes be used as flashlight.
anonymous
27
Has GPS
Yes
vs
No
GPS enables global positioning, useful in map, geo-tagging or navigation apps.
anonymous
26
Has a compass
Yes
vs
No
A compass is useful in games, map and navigation software.
anonymous
-397
Shorter
109 mm
vs
116.5 mm
7.50 mm shorter
BlackBerry 7.1
Yes
vs
No
Top 10 Reasons for BlackBerry 7.1
anonymous
94
Supports bookmarks sync across different devices
Yes
vs
No
anonymous
31
Can be used as a WiFi hot spot
Yes
vs
No
With a large enough data plan, you could cancel your home internet and use the device as a hotspot.
anonymous
27
Has free navigation software
Yes
vs
No
Free navigation software with free map data and updates included, no need to buy an dedicated navigation device.
anonymous
27
Has free syncing OTA
Yes
vs
No
All your contacts and calendar dates are synced over-the-air.
anonymous
25
Can be updated over-the-air
Yes
vs
No
It can be updated over the air (OTA) w/o connecting to a computer
anonymous
23
Copy and paste features in web browser
Yes
vs
No
anonymous
23
Has a search browser
Yes
vs
No
With a search browser application you can surf the internet from your device.
anonymous
20
Helps tracking the current position of a mobile device
Yes
vs
No
anonymous
18
You can take a screenshot of your phone's screen
Yes
vs
No
anonymous
17
Has a child lock
Yes
vs
No
A child lock enables adults to prevent or restrict children’s use of the device.

RIM BlackBerry Curve 9320 is better than Nokia Asha 302 because...

Yes
vs
No

Top Ten Reasons for the

Nokia Asha 302

Compared to RIM BlackBerry Curve 9320

anonymous
829
Faster CPU clock speed
1 x 1 GHz
vs
1 x 0.8 GHz
25% faster CPU clock speed
anonymous
666
Slightly higher pixel density
167 ppi
vs
164 ppi
1.83% higher pixel density
anonymous
232
Distinctly faster downloads
14.4 MBits/s
vs
7.2 MBits/s
2x faster downloads
anonymous
147
Has a brand lens
Yes
vs
No
The lens is made by a reputable photographic equipment manufacturer, as opposed to a low-cost unbranded lens.
anonymous
58
Plays Adobe Flash
Yes
vs
No
Adobe Flash with video and sound is supported in the device's browser.
anonymous
55
Measurably lower SAR for head (USA)
1.27 W/kg
vs
1.56 W/kg
0.29 W/kg lower SAR for head (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.
anonymous
43
Explicitly lower SAR for head (EU)
1.11 W/kg
vs
1.24 W/kg
0.13 W/kg lower SAR for head (EU). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 2.0 W/kg in the EU.
anonymous
28
Has a touch screen
Yes
vs
No
You can operate the device easily, by pressing the screen with your fingers.
anonymous
-352
Amply narrower
55.7 mm
vs
60 mm
4.30 mm narrower
anonymous
-362
Less body volume
72 cm³
vs
83 cm³
15.28% less body volume

Nokia Asha 302 is better than RIM BlackBerry Curve 9320 because...

Yes
vs
No

Compare with other products

x
Join