Download the official Versus Android app now Android app on Google Play

Samsung Galaxy Fame vs Samsung Galaxy Trend II

Top 13 Reasons for the

Samsung Galaxy Fame

Compared to Samsung Galaxy Trend II

anonymous
923
Distinctly more megapixels (photo)
Comment
5 MP
vs
3 MP
1.67x more megapixels (photo)
anonymous
355
Somewhat lighter
Comment
120.6 g
vs
127.6 g
7 g lighter
anonymous
337
Clearly more internal storage
Comment
4 GB
vs
0 GB
4 GB more internal storage
anonymous
303
Has a radio
Comment
Yes
vs
No
It works as an FM radio with included headsets
anonymous
148
Newer Bluetooth version
Comment
4
vs
3
Newer Bluetooth version
anonymous
103
Measurably lower SAR for body (USA)
Comment
0.98 W/kg
vs
1.08 W/kg
0.10 W/kg lower SAR for body (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at hip level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.
anonymous
100
Has a flash
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A flash is good for low-light environments, and can sometimes be used as flashlight.
anonymous
94
Has a front camera
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A front camera can be used for video chats / self portraits.
anonymous
40
Has a compass
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A compass is useful in games, map and navigation software.
anonymous
32
Has GPS
Comment
Yes
vs
No
GPS enables global positioning, useful in map, geo-tagging or navigation apps.
anonymous
-94
A bit narrower
Comment
61.6 mm
vs
63.03 mm
1.43 mm narrower
anonymous
-161
Somewhat less body volume
Comment
80.75 cm³
vs
86.91 cm³
7.63% less body volume
anonymous
-182
Shorter
Comment
113.2 mm
vs
121.49 mm
8.29 mm shorter

Samsung Galaxy Fame is better than Samsung Galaxy Trend II because...

Yes
vs
No

Top Nine Reasons for the

Samsung Galaxy Trend II

Compared to Samsung Galaxy Fame

anonymous
2006
More battery power
Comment
1500 mAh
vs
1300 mAh
15.38% more battery power
anonymous
1547
Vastly faster CPU clock speed
Comment
2 x 1.2 GHz
vs
1 x 1 GHz
2.40x faster CPU clock speed
anonymous
1273
Plenty higher pixel density
Comment
233 ppi
vs
165 ppi
41.21% higher pixel density
anonymous
991
Bigger screen size
Comment
4 "
vs
3.5 "
14.29% bigger screen size. The bigger the screen size is, the better the user experience.
anonymous
918
Significantly higher resolution
Comment
800x480 px
vs
480x320 px
2.50x higher resolution
anonymous
334
A tad thinner
Comment
11.35 mm
vs
11.6 mm
0.25 mm thinner
anonymous
301
Distinctly better video recording quality
Comment
480 x 30 fps
vs
240 x 25 fps
2.40x better video recording quality
anonymous
91
Clearly lower SAR for head (USA)
Comment
0.51 W/kg
vs
1.46 W/kg
0.95 W/kg lower SAR for head (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.
anonymous
72
Considerably lower SAR for head (EU)
Comment
0.29 W/kg
vs
0.83 W/kg
0.54 W/kg lower SAR for head (EU). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 2.0 W/kg in the EU.

Samsung Galaxy Trend II is better than Samsung Galaxy Fame because...

Yes
vs
No

Compare with other products

x
Join