Top 13 Reasons for the Samsung Galaxy Fame

Top Ten Reasons for the Samsung Galaxy Trend II

 
 
Which is better? Show result
0
0

Samsung Galaxy Fame vs Samsung Galaxy Trend II

Top 13 Reasons for the

Samsung Galaxy Fame

Compared to Samsung Galaxy Trend II

1781
Considerably more megapixels (photo)
Comment
5MP
vs
3MP
1.67x more megapixels (photo)

×

1043
A little bit lighter
Comment
120.6g
vs
127.6g
7g lighter

×

725
Distinctly more internal storage
Comment
4GB
vs
0GB
4GB more internal storage

×

659
Has a radio
Comment
Yes
vs
No
It works as an FM radio with included headsets

×

370
Marginally narrower
Comment
61.6mm
vs
63.03mm
1.43mm narrower

×

294
Shorter
Comment
113.2mm
vs
121.49mm
8.29mm shorter

×

277
Newer Bluetooth version
Comment
4
vs
3
Newer Bluetooth version

×

148
Has a flash
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A flash is good for low-light environments, and can sometimes be used as flashlight.

×

134
Sizably lower SAR for body (USA)
Comment
0.98W/kg
vs
1.08W/kg
0.10W/kg lower SAR for body (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at hip level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.

×

120
Has a front camera
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A front camera can be used for video chats / self portraits.

×

99
Somewhat less body volume
Comment
80.75cm³
vs
86.91cm³
7.63% less body volume

×

70
Has a compass
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A compass is useful in games, map and navigation software.

×

47
Has GPS
Comment
Yes
vs
No
GPS enables global positioning, useful in map, geo-tagging or navigation apps.

×

Samsung Galaxy Fame is better than Samsung Galaxy Trend II because...

Yes
vs
No

Please choose the related object

Top Ten Reasons for the

Samsung Galaxy Trend II

Compared to Samsung Galaxy Fame

3623
More battery power
Comment
1500mAh
vs
1300mAh
15.38% more battery power

×

2930
Appreciably faster CPU clock speed
Comment
2 x 1.2GHz
vs
1 x 1GHz
2.40x faster CPU clock speed

×

2482
A lot higher pixel density
Comment
233ppi
vs
165ppi
41.21% higher pixel density

×

2049
Bigger screen size
Comment
4"
vs
3.5"
14.29% bigger screen size. The bigger the screen size is, the better the user experience.

×

1675
Explicitly higher resolution
Comment
800x480px
vs
480x320px
2.50x higher resolution

×

886
A little thinner
Comment
11.35mm
vs
11.6mm
0.25mm thinner

×

549
Vastly better video recording quality
Comment
480 x 30fps
vs
240 x 25fps
2.40x better video recording quality

×

112
Noticeably lower SAR for head (USA)
Comment
0.51W/kg
vs
1.46W/kg
0.95W/kg lower SAR for head (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.

×

96
Sizably lower SAR for head (EU)
Comment
0.29W/kg
vs
0.83W/kg
0.54W/kg lower SAR for head (EU). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 2.0 W/kg in the EU.

×

Daxa Solanki
29
Better design
Comment
Yes
vs
No
It has a better design, it feels like a leather in hand.

×

Samsung Galaxy Trend II is better than Samsung Galaxy Fame because...

Yes
vs
No

Please choose the related object

x
Join