Top 13 Reasons for the Samsung Galaxy Fame

Top Ten Reasons for the Samsung Galaxy Trend II

 
 
Which is better? Show result
0
0

Embed this comparison:

Samsung Galaxy Fame vs Samsung Galaxy Trend II

Top 13 Reasons for the

Samsung Galaxy Fame

Compared to Samsung Galaxy Trend II

1717
Distinctly more megapixels (photo)
Comment
5 MP
vs
3 MP
1.67x more megapixels (photo)

×

976
A tad lighter
Comment
120.6 g
vs
127.6 g
7 g lighter

×

695
Distinctly more internal storage
Comment
4 GB
vs
0 GB
4 GB more internal storage

×

633
Has a radio
Comment
Yes
vs
No
It works as an FM radio with included headsets

×

332
Somewhat narrower
Comment
61.6 mm
vs
63.03 mm
1.43 mm narrower

×

265
Newer Bluetooth version
Comment
4
vs
3
Newer Bluetooth version

×

259
Shorter
Comment
113.2 mm
vs
121.49 mm
8.29 mm shorter

×

145
Has a flash
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A flash is good for low-light environments, and can sometimes be used as flashlight.

×

130
Appreciably lower SAR for body (USA)
Comment
0.98 W/kg
vs
1.08 W/kg
0.10 W/kg lower SAR for body (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at hip level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.

×

118
Has a front camera
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A front camera can be used for video chats / self portraits.

×

81
Modestly less body volume
Comment
80.75 cm³
vs
86.91 cm³
7.63% less body volume

×

68
Has a compass
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A compass is useful in games, map and navigation software.

×

44
Has GPS
Comment
Yes
vs
No
GPS enables global positioning, useful in map, geo-tagging or navigation apps.

×

Samsung Galaxy Fame is better than Samsung Galaxy Trend II because...

Yes
vs
No

Please choose the related object

Top Ten Reasons for the

Samsung Galaxy Trend II

Compared to Samsung Galaxy Fame

3489
More battery power
Comment
1500 mAh
vs
1300 mAh
15.38% more battery power

×

2821
Significantly faster CPU clock speed
Comment
2 x 1.2 GHz
vs
1 x 1 GHz
2.40x faster CPU clock speed

×

2383
A lot higher pixel density
Comment
233 ppi
vs
165 ppi
41.21% higher pixel density

×

1975
Bigger screen size
Comment
4 "
vs
3.5 "
14.29% bigger screen size. The bigger the screen size is, the better the user experience.

×

1617
Sizably higher resolution
Comment
800x480 px
vs
480x320 px
2.50x higher resolution

×

827
Modestly thinner
Comment
11.35 mm
vs
11.6 mm
0.25 mm thinner

×

528
Considerably better video recording quality
Comment
480 x 30 fps
vs
240 x 25 fps
2.40x better video recording quality

×

112
Appreciably lower SAR for head (USA)
Comment
0.51 W/kg
vs
1.46 W/kg
0.95 W/kg lower SAR for head (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.

×

94
Vastly lower SAR for head (EU)
Comment
0.29 W/kg
vs
0.83 W/kg
0.54 W/kg lower SAR for head (EU). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 2.0 W/kg in the EU.

×

Daxa Solanki
28
Better design
Comment
Yes
vs
No
It has a better design, it feels like a leather in hand.

×

Samsung Galaxy Trend II is better than Samsung Galaxy Fame because...

Yes
vs
No

Please choose the related object

x
Join