Samsung Galaxy Fame vs Samsung Galaxy Trend II

Top 13 Reasons for the

Samsung Galaxy Fame

Compared to Samsung Galaxy Trend II

anonymous
533
Clearly more megapixels (photo)
5 MP
vs
3 MP
1.67x more megapixels (photo)
anonymous
157
Clearly more internal storage
4 GB
vs
0 GB
4 GB more internal storage
anonymous
132
Has a radio
Yes
vs
No
It works as an FM radio with included headsets
anonymous
90
A little lighter
120.6 g
vs
127.6 g
7 g lighter
anonymous
75
Newer Bluetooth version
4
vs
3
Newer Bluetooth version
anonymous
65
Has a flash
Yes
vs
No
A flash is good for low-light environments, and can sometimes be used as flashlight.
anonymous
64
Considerably lower SAR for body (USA)
0.98 W/kg
vs
1.08 W/kg
0.10 W/kg lower SAR for body (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at hip level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.
anonymous
53
Has a front camera
Yes
vs
No
A front camera can be used for video chats / self portraits.
anonymous
27
Has a compass
Yes
vs
No
A compass is useful in games, map and navigation software.
anonymous
27
Has GPS
Yes
vs
No
GPS enables global positioning, useful in map, geo-tagging or navigation apps.
anonymous
-348
Modestly narrower
61.6 mm
vs
63.03 mm
1.43 mm narrower
anonymous
-360
A little less body volume
80.75 cm³
vs
86.91 cm³
7.63% less body volume
anonymous
-393
Shorter
113.2 mm
vs
121.49 mm
8.29 mm shorter

Samsung Galaxy Fame is better than Samsung Galaxy Trend II because...

Yes
vs
No

Top Ten Reasons for the

Samsung Galaxy Trend II

Compared to Samsung Galaxy Fame

anonymous
1095
More battery power
1500 mAh
vs
1300 mAh
15.38% more battery power
anonymous
854
Considerably faster CPU clock speed
2 x 1.2 GHz
vs
1 x 1 GHz
2.40x faster CPU clock speed
anonymous
685
Reasonably higher pixel density
233 ppi
vs
165 ppi
41.21% higher pixel density
anonymous
584
Considerably higher resolution
800x480 px
vs
480x320 px
2.50x higher resolution
anonymous
484
Bigger screen size
4 "
vs
3.5 "
14.29% bigger screen size. The bigger the screen size is, the better the user experience.
anonymous
147
Sizably better video recording quality
480 x 30 fps
vs
240 x 25 fps
2.40x better video recording quality
anonymous
98
A bit thinner
11.35 mm
vs
11.6 mm
0.25 mm thinner
anonymous
55
Explicitly lower SAR for head (USA)
0.51 W/kg
vs
1.46 W/kg
0.95 W/kg lower SAR for head (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.
anonymous
43
Vastly lower SAR for head (EU)
0.29 W/kg
vs
0.83 W/kg
0.54 W/kg lower SAR for head (EU). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 2.0 W/kg in the EU.
anonymous
24
Can create panoramas in-camera
Yes
vs
No
It allows you to take multiple photos capturing different parts of the scene, and then joins them together into a single photo.

Samsung Galaxy Trend II is better than Samsung Galaxy Fame because...

Yes
vs
No

Compare with other products

x
Join