Samsung Galaxy Fame vs Samsung Galaxy Trend II

Top 13 Reasons for the

Samsung Galaxy Fame

Compared to Samsung Galaxy Trend II

anonymous
1343
Clearly more megapixels (photo)
Comment
5 MP
vs
3 MP
1.67x more megapixels (photo)
anonymous
665
Somewhat lighter
Comment
120.6 g
vs
127.6 g
7 g lighter
anonymous
506
Clearly more internal storage
Comment
4 GB
vs
0 GB
4 GB more internal storage
anonymous
458
Has a radio
Comment
Yes
vs
No
It works as an FM radio with included headsets
anonymous
202
Newer Bluetooth version
Comment
4
vs
3
Newer Bluetooth version
anonymous
127
A little narrower
Comment
61.6 mm
vs
63.03 mm
1.43 mm narrower
anonymous
122
Has a flash
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A flash is good for low-light environments, and can sometimes be used as flashlight.
anonymous
115
Sizably lower SAR for body (USA)
Comment
0.98 W/kg
vs
1.08 W/kg
0.10 W/kg lower SAR for body (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at hip level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.
anonymous
103
Has a front camera
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A front camera can be used for video chats / self portraits.
anonymous
68
Shorter
Comment
113.2 mm
vs
121.49 mm
8.29 mm shorter
anonymous
52
Has a compass
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A compass is useful in games, map and navigation software.
anonymous
39
Has GPS
Comment
Yes
vs
No
GPS enables global positioning, useful in map, geo-tagging or navigation apps.
anonymous
-2
A shade less body volume
Comment
80.75 cm³
vs
86.91 cm³
7.63% less body volume

Samsung Galaxy Fame is better than Samsung Galaxy Trend II because...

Yes
vs
No

Top Ten Reasons for the

Samsung Galaxy Trend II

Compared to Samsung Galaxy Fame

anonymous
2749
More battery power
Comment
1500 mAh
vs
1300 mAh
15.38% more battery power
anonymous
2196
Notably faster CPU clock speed
Comment
2 x 1.2 GHz
vs
1 x 1 GHz
2.40x faster CPU clock speed
anonymous
1853
A lot higher pixel density
Comment
233 ppi
vs
165 ppi
41.21% higher pixel density
anonymous
1476
Bigger screen size
Comment
4 "
vs
3.5 "
14.29% bigger screen size. The bigger the screen size is, the better the user experience.
anonymous
1297
Distinctly higher resolution
Comment
800x480 px
vs
480x320 px
2.50x higher resolution
anonymous
567
Slightly thinner
Comment
11.35 mm
vs
11.6 mm
0.25 mm thinner
anonymous
413
Noticeably better video recording quality
Comment
480 x 30 fps
vs
240 x 25 fps
2.40x better video recording quality
anonymous
106
Considerably lower SAR for head (USA)
Comment
0.51 W/kg
vs
1.46 W/kg
0.95 W/kg lower SAR for head (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.
anonymous
85
Considerably lower SAR for head (EU)
Comment
0.29 W/kg
vs
0.83 W/kg
0.54 W/kg lower SAR for head (EU). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 2.0 W/kg in the EU.
Daxa Solanki
18
Better design
Comment
Yes
vs
No
It has a better design, it feels like a leather in hand.

Samsung Galaxy Trend II is better than Samsung Galaxy Fame because...

Yes
vs
No

Compare with other products

x
Join