Samsung Galaxy Grand Duos vs Sony Xperia SP C5302

Top Eight Reasons for the

Samsung Galaxy Grand Duos

Compared to Sony Xperia SP C5302

anonymous
1697
Somewhat bigger screen size
Comment
5 "
vs
4.6 "
8.70% bigger screen size. The bigger the screen size is, the better the user experience.
anonymous
1189
Explicitly more megapixel (photo, front camera)
Comment
2 MP
vs
0.3 MP
6.67x more megapixel (photo, front camera)
anonymous
841
Has a removable battery
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The battery is removable and can be replaced by the user if broken.
anonymous
687
Modestly thinner
Comment
9.6 mm
vs
10 mm
0.40 mm thinner
anonymous
243
Has continuous autofocus when recording movies
Comment
Yes
vs
No
When recording movies they stay focussed and sharp.
anonymous
151
Supports two SIM cards
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A dual SIM mobile phone can work with two SIM cards at the same time.
anonymous
108
Noticeably lower SAR for head (USA)
Comment
0.37 W/kg
vs
0.63 W/kg
0.26 W/kg lower SAR for head (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.
anonymous
89
Notably lower SAR for head (EU)
Comment
0.24 W/kg
vs
0.79 W/kg
0.55 W/kg lower SAR for head (EU). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 2.0 W/kg in the EU.
Boudebbous Mouhamed
-4
Plus beau
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Moche

Samsung Galaxy Grand Duos is better than Sony Xperia SP C5302 because...

Yes
vs
No

Top 49 Reasons for the

Sony Xperia SP C5302

Compared to Samsung Galaxy Grand Duos

anonymous
3068
More battery power
Comment
2370 mAh
vs
2100 mAh
12.86% more battery power
anonymous
2487
Plenty faster CPU clock speed
Comment
2 x 1.7 GHz
vs
2 x 1.2 GHz
41.67% faster CPU clock speed
anonymous
2101
Considerably higher pixel density
Comment
319 ppi
vs
187 ppi
1.71x higher pixel density
anonymous
1438
Significantly higher resolution
Comment
1280x720 px
vs
800x480 px
2.40x higher resolution
anonymous
940
Has branded damage resistant glass
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Damage resistant glass (such as Corning Gorilla Glass or Asahi Dragontail Glass) is thin and lightweight, and can withstand high levels of force.
anonymous
806
A little bit lighter
Comment
155 g
vs
162 g
7 g lighter
anonymous
598
Sizably faster downloads
Comment
42 MBits/s
vs
21 MBits/s
2x faster downloads
anonymous
491
Has a dedicated camera button
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A dedicated camera button allows you to take snapshots more easily.
anonymous
407
Has NFC
Comment
Yes
vs
No
NFC (near field communication) allows a device to perform simple wireless transactions.
anonymous
344
Has a two-stage shutter
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A two-stage shutter is good for taking photos like a pro; apply pressure to the button in order for the lens to focus, and then press it fully to capture the photograph.
anonymous
274
Has a BSI sensor
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A BSI (backside illuminated) sensor is a camera image sensor which captures better quality images in poor lighting conditions, and offers better overall sharpness and image quality.
anonymous
234
Appreciably more microphone(s)
Comment
2
vs
1
1 more microphone(s). More microphones result in better sound quality and enable the device to filter out background noise.
anonymous
224
Has a video light
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A video light helps when recording a movie in low-light situation like a party.
anonymous
222
Notably narrower
Comment
67.1 mm
vs
76.9 mm
9.80 mm narrower
anonymous
219
Has manual exposure
Comment
Yes
vs
No
This allows to manually set the exposure.
anonymous
192
Slightly faster uploads
Comment
5.8 MBits/s
vs
5.76 MBits/s
0.69% faster uploads
anonymous
164
Shorter
Comment
130.6 mm
vs
143.5 mm
12.90 mm shorter
anonymous
154
Has a built-in HDR mode
Comment
Yes
vs
No
It can automatically shoot pictures with a higher dynamic range (HDR).
anonymous
121
Marginally lower SAR for body (USA)
Comment
1.08 W/kg
vs
1.11 W/kg
0.03 W/kg lower SAR for body (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at hip level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.
anonymous
41
Less body volume
Comment
87.63 cm³
vs
105.94 cm³
20.89% less body volume
Martinus Kevin Sullivan
34
PlayStation Mobile Certified
Comment
Yes
vs
No
This Xperia can play apps & games from PlayStation Mobile platform. US/EU PSN ID is required to use this feature.
Martinus Kevin Sullivan
21
Dualshock 3 Controller Ready
Comment
Yes
vs
No
This Xperia can use Dualshock 3 via Bluetooth officially. No root required
Khaja Moinuddin
12
BRAVIA® Engine 2
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Aravind Girish Nair
8
It has NFC
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Robby Andri Wijaya
8
Supports NFC
Comment
Yes
vs
No
NFC enables wireless payments through your device. You can also connect two NFC enabled devices just by touching them with each other.
Paul Eros
8
Multicolored Led flash ( LED notification colors)
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Different statuses indicated with different colors,you can also get apps that will let you mix and match the colors , so depending on who's calling , like red/green could be your mom while purple/orange could be work calling and on and on
Show more reasons

Sony Xperia SP C5302 is better than Samsung Galaxy Grand Duos because...

Yes
vs
No

Compare with other products

x
Join