Top Nine Reasons for the Samsung Galaxy Grand Duos

Top 49 Reasons for the Sony Xperia SP C5302

 
 
Which is better? Show result
0
0

Samsung Galaxy Grand Duos vs Sony Xperia SP C5302

Top Nine Reasons for the

Samsung Galaxy Grand Duos

Compared to Sony Xperia SP C5302

2049
A little bigger screen size
Comment
5"
vs
4.6"
8.70% bigger screen size. The bigger the screen size is, the better the user experience.

×

1459
Substantially more megapixel (photo, front camera)
Comment
2MP
vs
0.3MP
6.67x more megapixel (photo, front camera)

×

986
Has a removable battery
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The battery is removable and can be replaced by the user if broken.

×

885
Marginally thinner
Comment
9.6mm
vs
10mm
0.40mm thinner

×

298
Has continuous autofocus when recording movies
Comment
Yes
vs
No
When recording movies they stay focussed and sharp.

×

192
Supports two SIM cards
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A dual SIM mobile phone can work with two SIM cards at the same time.

×

112
Appreciably lower SAR for head (USA)
Comment
0.37W/kg
vs
0.63W/kg
0.26W/kg lower SAR for head (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.

×

96
Vastly lower SAR for head (EU)
Comment
0.24W/kg
vs
0.79W/kg
0.55W/kg lower SAR for head (EU). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 2.0 W/kg in the EU.

×

Zaki Sebti
5
Smart Dual Sim
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Using Dual Sim With Smart

×

Boudebbous Mouhamed
-3
Plus beau
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Moche

×

Samsung Galaxy Grand Duos is better than Sony Xperia SP C5302 because...

Yes
vs
No

Please choose the related object

Top 49 Reasons for the

Sony Xperia SP C5302

Compared to Samsung Galaxy Grand Duos

3622
More battery power
Comment
2370mAh
vs
2100mAh
12.86% more battery power

×

2929
Much faster CPU clock speed
Comment
2 x 1.7GHz
vs
2 x 1.2GHz
41.67% faster CPU clock speed

×

2481
Measurably higher pixel density
Comment
319ppi
vs
187ppi
1.71x higher pixel density

×

1674
Considerably higher resolution
Comment
1280x720px
vs
800x480px
2.40x higher resolution

×

1103
Has branded damage resistant glass
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Damage resistant glass (such as Corning Gorilla Glass or Asahi Dragontail Glass) is thin and lightweight, and can withstand high levels of force.

×

1042
A shade lighter
Comment
155g
vs
162g
7g lighter

×

667
Considerably faster downloads
Comment
42MBits/s
vs
21MBits/s
2x faster downloads

×

564
Has a dedicated camera button
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A dedicated camera button allows you to take snapshots more easily.

×

478
Has NFC
Comment
Yes
vs
No
NFC (near field communication) allows a device to perform simple wireless transactions.

×

386
Has a two-stage shutter
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A two-stage shutter is good for taking photos like a pro; apply pressure to the button in order for the lens to focus, and then press it fully to capture the photograph.

×

370
Sizably narrower
Comment
67.1mm
vs
76.9mm
9.80mm narrower

×

314
Has a BSI sensor
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A BSI (backside illuminated) sensor is a camera image sensor which captures better quality images in poor lighting conditions, and offers better overall sharpness and image quality.

×

294
Shorter
Comment
130.6mm
vs
143.5mm
12.90mm shorter

×

292
Substantially more microphone(s)
Comment
2
vs
1
1 more microphone(s). More microphones result in better sound quality and enable the device to filter out background noise.

×

269
Has a video light
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A video light helps when recording a movie in low-light situation like a party.

×

260
Has manual exposure
Comment
Yes
vs
No
This allows to manually set the exposure.

×

219
Somewhat faster uploads
Comment
5.8MBits/s
vs
5.76MBits/s
0.69% faster uploads

×

178
Has a built-in HDR mode
Comment
Yes
vs
No
It can automatically shoot pictures with a higher dynamic range (HDR).

×

134
Modestly lower SAR for body (USA)
Comment
1.08W/kg
vs
1.11W/kg
0.03W/kg lower SAR for body (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at hip level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.

×

99
Less body volume
Comment
87.63cm³
vs
105.94cm³
20.89% less body volume

×

Martinus Kevin Sullivan
35
PlayStation Mobile Certified
Comment
Yes
vs
No
This Xperia can play apps & games from PlayStation Mobile platform. US/EU PSN ID is required to use this feature.

×

Martinus Kevin Sullivan
23
Dualshock 3 Controller Ready
Comment
Yes
vs
No
This Xperia can use Dualshock 3 via Bluetooth officially. No root required

×

Khaja Moinuddin
12
BRAVIA® Engine 2
Comment
Yes
vs
No

×

Aravind Girish Nair
9
It has NFC
Comment
Yes
vs
No

×

Robby Andri Wijaya
9
Supports NFC
Comment
Yes
vs
No
NFC enables wireless payments through your device. You can also connect two NFC enabled devices just by touching them with each other.

×

Paul Eros
8
Multicolored Led flash ( LED notification colors)
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Different statuses indicated with different colors,you can also get apps that will let you mix and match the colors , so depending on who's calling , like red/green could be your mom while purple/orange could be work calling and on and on

×

Show more reasons

Sony Xperia SP C5302 is better than Samsung Galaxy Grand Duos because...

Yes
vs
No

Please choose the related object

x
Join