Samsung Galaxy Note 2 vs HTC One

Top Nine Reasons for the

Samsung Galaxy Note 2

Compared to HTC One

anonymous
2741
Amply more battery power
Comment
3100 mAh
vs
2300 mAh
34.78% more battery power
anonymous
1467
Bigger screen size
Comment
5.5 "
vs
4.7 "
17.02% bigger screen size. The bigger the screen size is, the better the user experience.
anonymous
1332
Clearly more megapixels (photo)
Comment
8 MP
vs
4 MP
2x more megapixels (photo)
anonymous
1051
Has an external memory slot
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The device has a standard memory slot (such as an SD or micro SD card slot) so that you can either extend the internal storage with affordable memory modules or you can retrieve data, such as photographs, easily from a memory card.
anonymous
735
Has a removable battery
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The battery is removable and can be replaced by the user if broken.
anonymous
106
Clearly lower SAR for head (USA)
Comment
0.23 W/kg
vs
1.26 W/kg
1.03 W/kg lower SAR for head (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.
anonymous
85
Sizably lower SAR for head (EU)
Comment
0.17 W/kg
vs
0.86 W/kg
0.69 W/kg lower SAR for head (EU). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 2.0 W/kg in the EU.
Aiden Richardson
46
Has a stylus
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A stylus lets you draw on the screen and take notes like with a pen
Samsung Exynos 4412
Yes
vs
No
Top 0 Reasons for Samsung Exynos 4412
ARM Mali 400 MP4
Yes
vs
No
Top 1 Reason for ARM Mali 400 MP4
anonymous
219
Measurably faster GPU clock speed
Comment
533 MHz
vs
400 MHz
133 MHz faster GPU clock speed. The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.

Samsung Galaxy Note 2 is better than HTC One because...

Yes
vs
No

Top 43 Reasons for the

HTC One

Compared to Samsung Galaxy Note 2

anonymous
2188
A shade faster CPU clock speed
Comment
4 x 1.7 GHz
vs
4 x 1.6 GHz
6.25% faster CPU clock speed
anonymous
1847
Clearly higher pixel density
Comment
469 ppi
vs
267 ppi
1.76x higher pixel density
anonymous
1288
Explicitly higher resolution
Comment
1920x1080 px
vs
1280x720 px
2.25x higher resolution
anonymous
1036
Reasonably more megapixel (photo, front camera)
Comment
2 MP
vs
1.9 MP
5.26% more megapixel (photo, front camera)
anonymous
791
Every pixel has three subpixels.
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The device has a display with three full subpixels per pixel, resulting in a sharp and crisp picture. Pixels in some displays (like AMOLED) share one subpixel to preserve space. This can result in a less crisp, slightly blurred image.
anonymous
664
Has built-in optical image stabilization
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Optical image stabilization uses gyroscopic sensors to detect vibrations of the camera. The lens and / or sensor move in response, adjusting the optical path. This ensures that any motion is corrected before the sensor captures the image.
anonymous
662
Lots lighter
Comment
143 g
vs
183 g
40 g lighter
anonymous
563
A tad thinner
Comment
9.3 mm
vs
9.4 mm
0.10 mm thinner
anonymous
543
Distinctly faster downloads
Comment
100 MBits/s
vs
21 MBits/s
4.76x faster downloads
anonymous
216
Has continuous autofocus when recording movies
Comment
Yes
vs
No
When recording movies they stay focussed and sharp.
anonymous
192
Has manual exposure
Comment
Yes
vs
No
This allows to manually set the exposure.
anonymous
186
Notably smaller semiconductor size
Comment
28 nm
vs
32 nm
4 nm smaller semiconductor size. A smaller size indicates that the process to create the chip is newer.
anonymous
176
Appreciably faster uploads
Comment
50 MBits/s
vs
5.76 MBits/s
8.68x faster uploads
anonymous
172
Has a CMOS sensor
Comment
Yes
vs
No
CMOS image sensors are slowly replacing CCD sensors, due to reduced power consumption and better image quality. They can be very compact and cost relatively little to produce.
anonymous
169
Higher GeekBench result
Comment
585
vs
478
Higher GeekBench result. This is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the performance of the CPU. (Source: Primate Labs, 2014)
anonymous
159
Supports slow motion video recording
Comment
Yes
vs
No
anonymous
125
Vastly narrower
Comment
68.2 mm
vs
80.5 mm
12.30 mm narrower
anonymous
115
Distinctly lower SAR for body (USA)
Comment
0.69 W/kg
vs
0.95 W/kg
0.26 W/kg lower SAR for body (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at hip level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.
anonymous
80
Appreciably higher memory bandwidth
Comment
8.5 GB/s
vs
6.4 GB/s
2.10 GB/s higher memory bandwidth. A higher memory bandwidth means the memory can be accessed faster and therefore data can be retrieved quicker, having a positive effect on the performance.
anonymous
68
Shorter
Comment
137.4 mm
vs
151.1 mm
13.70 mm shorter
Ethan Elshyeb
13
Ir blaster
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Have a ir blaster
H Rehman Khan
12
Sound BEATS AUDIO
Comment
Yes
vs
No
It has speakers of Beats brand
Kwaku Israel Blackwell
10
Has AC WiFi
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The device is said to incorporate [url] AC wifi standards, significantly faster speeds than [url]
Jaqueline Nierath
9
Htc zoe
Comment
Yes
vs
No
It has a lot of camera features which allows you to edit your photos and make them as you want.
Florence Collins
9
Has DSP
Comment
Yes
vs
No
DSP (digital signal processing) is used to improve the sound quality.
Ricky Fang
9
Aluminium Back
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Premium feel to the phone
Show more reasons
Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 APQ8064T
Yes
vs
No
Top 2 Reasons for Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 APQ8064T
anonymous
145
Noticeably higher ram speed
Comment
600 MHz
vs
400 MHz
200 MHz higher ram speed. It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.
anonymous
75
Substantially more memory bandwidth
Comment
12.8 GB/s
vs
6.4 GB/s
6.40 GB/s more memory bandwidth. This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.
Qualcomm Krait 300
Yes
vs
No
Top 5 Reasons for Qualcomm Krait 300
anonymous
91
Has dynamic frequency scaling
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Dynamic frequency scaling is a technology that allows the processor to conserve power and reduce noise when it is under a light load.
anonymous
75
Significantly wider front-end
Comment
3
vs
2
1 wider front-end. The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better
anonymous
67
Supports hardware-assisted virtualization
Comment
Yes
vs
No
It is easier to obtain better performance when using virtualization if it is hardware-assisted.
anonymous
43
Clearly more bits executed at a time
Comment
128
vs
64
64 more bits executed at a time. NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.
anonymous
38
Distinctly newer version of VFP
Comment
4
vs
3
1 newer version of VFP. Vector Floating-Point (VFP) is used by the processor to deliver increased performance in areas such as digital imaging.
Qualcomm Adreno 320 (400MHz)
Yes
vs
No
Top 4 Reasons for Qualcomm Adreno 320 (400MHz)
anonymous
115
Notably higher floating-point performance
Comment
0.057 TFLOPS
vs
0.02 TFLOPS
0.04 TFLOPS higher floating-point performance. Floating-point performance is a measurement of the raw processing power of the GPU.
anonymous
75
Considerably higher pixel rate
Comment
3.2 GPixel/s
vs
0.5 GPixel/s
2.70 GPixel/s higher pixel rate. The number of pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.
anonymous
66
Newer version of OpenGL ES
Comment
3
vs
2
Newer version of OpenGL ES. OpenGL ES is used for games on mobile devices such as smartphones. Newer versions support better graphics.
anonymous
50
Newer version of OpenVG
Comment
3
vs
1.1
Newer version of OpenVG. OpenVG is used to improve the rendering of 2D graphics on mobile devices, for example the user interface (UI) on a smartphone.

HTC One is better than Samsung Galaxy Note 2 because...

Yes
vs
No

Compare with other products

x
Join