Download the official Versus Android app now Android app on Google Play

Samsung Galaxy Note 2 vs HTC One

Top Nine Reasons for the

Samsung Galaxy Note 2

Compared to HTC One

anonymous
2400
Amply more battery power
Comment
3100 mAh
vs
2300 mAh
34.78% more battery power
anonymous
1209
Bigger screen size
Comment
5.5 "
vs
4.7 "
17.02% bigger screen size. The bigger the screen size is, the better the user experience.
anonymous
1116
Significantly more megapixels (photo)
Comment
8 MP
vs
4 MP
2x more megapixels (photo)
anonymous
881
Has an external memory slot
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The device has a standard memory slot (such as an SD or micro SD card slot) so that you can either extend the internal storage with affordable memory modules or you can retrieve data, such as photographs, easily from a memory card.
anonymous
594
Has a removable battery
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The battery is removable and can be replaced by the user if broken.
anonymous
100
Sizably lower SAR for head (USA)
Comment
0.23 W/kg
vs
1.26 W/kg
1.03 W/kg lower SAR for head (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.
anonymous
80
Distinctly lower SAR for head (EU)
Comment
0.17 W/kg
vs
0.86 W/kg
0.69 W/kg lower SAR for head (EU). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 2.0 W/kg in the EU.
Aiden Richardson
45
Has a stylus
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A stylus lets you draw on the screen and take notes like with a pen
Samsung Exynos 4412
Yes
vs
No
Top 0 Reasons for Samsung Exynos 4412
ARM Mali 400 MP4
Yes
vs
No
Top 1 Reason for ARM Mali 400 MP4
anonymous
140
Substantially faster GPU clock speed
Comment
533 MHz
vs
400 MHz
133 MHz faster GPU clock speed. The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.

Samsung Galaxy Note 2 is better than HTC One because...

Yes
vs
No

Top 42 Reasons for the

HTC One

Compared to Samsung Galaxy Note 2

anonymous
1835
Modestly faster CPU clock speed
Comment
4 x 1.7 GHz
vs
4 x 1.6 GHz
6.25% faster CPU clock speed
anonymous
1536
Explicitly higher pixel density
Comment
469 ppi
vs
267 ppi
1.76x higher pixel density
anonymous
1087
Explicitly higher resolution
Comment
1920x1080 px
vs
1280x720 px
2.25x higher resolution
anonymous
821
Much more megapixel (photo, front camera)
Comment
2 MP
vs
1.9 MP
5.26% more megapixel (photo, front camera)
anonymous
677
Every pixel has three subpixels
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The device has a display with three full subpixels per pixel, resulting in a sharp and crisp picture. Pixels in some displays (like AMOLED) share one subpixel to preserve space. This can result in a less crisp, slightly blurred image.
anonymous
578
Has built-in optical image stabilization
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Optical image stabilization uses gyroscopic sensors to detect vibrations of the camera. The lens and / or sensor move in response, adjusting the optical path. This ensures that any motion is corrected before the sensor captures the image.
anonymous
489
Reasonably lighter
Comment
143 g
vs
183 g
40 g lighter
anonymous
486
Notably faster downloads
Comment
100 MBits/s
vs
21 MBits/s
4.76x faster downloads
anonymous
440
A shade thinner
Comment
9.3 mm
vs
9.4 mm
0.10 mm thinner
anonymous
183
Has continuous autofocus when recording movies
Comment
Yes
vs
No
When recording movies they stay focussed and sharp.
anonymous
174
Has manual exposure
Comment
Yes
vs
No
This allows to manually set the exposure.
anonymous
161
Measurably faster uploads
Comment
50 MBits/s
vs
5.76 MBits/s
8.68x faster uploads
anonymous
160
Distinctly smaller semiconductor size
Comment
28 nm
vs
32 nm
4 nm smaller semiconductor size. A smaller size indicates that the process to create the chip is newer.
anonymous
147
Has a CMOS sensor
Comment
Yes
vs
No
CMOS image sensors are slowly replacing CCD sensors, due to reduced power consumption and better image quality. They can be very compact and cost relatively little to produce.
anonymous
134
Higher GeekBench result
Comment
585
vs
478
Higher GeekBench result. This is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the performance of the CPU. (Source: Primate Labs, 2014)
anonymous
132
Supports slow motion video recording
Comment
Yes
vs
No
anonymous
113
Distinctly lower SAR for body (USA)
Comment
0.69 W/kg
vs
0.95 W/kg
0.26 W/kg lower SAR for body (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at hip level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.
anonymous
71
Distinctly higher memory bandwidth
Comment
8.5 GB/s
vs
6.4 GB/s
2.10 GB/s higher memory bandwidth. A higher memory bandwidth means the memory can be accessed faster and therefore data can be retrieved quicker, having a positive effect on the performance.
anonymous
14
Distinctly narrower
Comment
68.2 mm
vs
80.5 mm
12.30 mm narrower
H Rehman Khan
10
Sound BEATS AUDIO
Comment
Yes
vs
No
It has speakers of Beats brand
Kwaku Israel Blackwell
9
Has AC WiFi
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The device is said to incorporate [url] AC wifi standards, significantly faster speeds than [url]
Florence Collins
8
Has DSP
Comment
Yes
vs
No
DSP (digital signal processing) is used to improve the sound quality.
Ricky Fang
8
Aluminium Back
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Premium feel to the phone
Ethan Elshyeb
5
It has blinkfeed
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Jaqueline Nierath
5
Htc zoe
Comment
Yes
vs
No
It has a lot of camera features which allows you to edit your photos and make them as you want.
Ethan Elshyeb
3
Ir blaster
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Have a ir blaster
Show more reasons
Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 APQ8064T
Yes
vs
No
Top 2 Reasons for Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 APQ8064T
anonymous
96
Sizably higher ram speed
Comment
600 MHz
vs
400 MHz
200 MHz higher ram speed. It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.
anonymous
56
Noticeably more memory bandwidth
Comment
12.8 GB/s
vs
6.4 GB/s
6.40 GB/s more memory bandwidth. This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.
Qualcomm Krait 300
Yes
vs
No
Top 5 Reasons for Qualcomm Krait 300
anonymous
72
Has dynamic frequency scaling
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Dynamic frequency scaling is a technology that allows the processor to conserve power and reduce noise when it is under a light load.
anonymous
58
Noticeably wider front-end
Comment
3
vs
2
1 wider front-end. The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better
anonymous
53
Supports hardware-assisted virtualization
Comment
Yes
vs
No
It is easier to obtain better performance when using virtualization if it is hardware-assisted.
anonymous
37
Distinctly more bits executed at a time
Comment
128
vs
64
64 more bits executed at a time. NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.
anonymous
34
Substantially newer version of VFP
Comment
4
vs
3
1 newer version of VFP. Vector Floating-Point (VFP) is used by the processor to deliver increased performance in areas such as digital imaging.
Qualcomm Adreno 320 (400MHz)
Yes
vs
No
Top 4 Reasons for Qualcomm Adreno 320 (400MHz)
anonymous
74
Significantly higher floating-point performance
Comment
0.057 TFLOPS
vs
0.02 TFLOPS
0.04 TFLOPS higher floating-point performance. Floating-point performance is a measurement of the raw processing power of the GPU.
anonymous
55
Vastly higher pixel rate
Comment
3.2 GPixel/s
vs
0.5 GPixel/s
2.70 GPixel/s higher pixel rate. The number of pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.
anonymous
47
Newer version of OpenGL ES
Comment
3
vs
2
Newer version of OpenGL ES. OpenGL ES is used for games on mobile devices such as smartphones. Newer versions support better graphics.
anonymous
40
Newer version of OpenVG
Comment
3
vs
1.1
Newer version of OpenVG. OpenVG is used to improve the rendering of 2D graphics on mobile devices, for example the user interface (UI) on a smartphone.

HTC One is better than Samsung Galaxy Note 2 because...

Yes
vs
No

Compare with other products

x
Join