Top Twelve Reasons for the Samsung Galaxy S II Lite

Top 21 Reasons for the Samsung Galaxy SII

 
 
Which is better? Show result
0
0

Embed this comparison:

Samsung Galaxy S II Lite vs Samsung Galaxy SII

Top Twelve Reasons for the

Samsung Galaxy S II Lite

Compared to Samsung Galaxy SII

anonymous
2239
A bit higher pixel density
Comment
233 ppi
vs
218 ppi
6.88% higher pixel density
anonymous
272
Narrower
Comment
63 mm
vs
66.1 mm
3.10 mm narrower
anonymous
215
Somewhat shorter
Comment
123.2 mm
vs
125.3 mm
2.10 mm shorter
Ajdin Hasanefendić
1
Is upradable to Android 4.1.2
Comment
Yes
vs
No
It is upgradable to Android 4.1.2 via Samsung Kies but your RAM gets close to 550 MB of usage iut of the 700 MB you have.
Ajdin Hasanefendić
1
Has 2 GB of App storage.
Comment
Yes
vs
No
You can install up to 2 GB of Aplications onto this phone.
Ajdin Hasanefendić
1
Has 4 GB of Internal storage
Comment
Yes
vs
No
And reads SD cards too.
Android 4.1 Jelly Bean (API level 16)
Yes
vs
No
Top 6 Reasons for Android 4.1 Jelly Bean (API level 16)
anonymous
402
The browser has word wrap
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The web browser has automatic word wrap when zooming, the user can easily read long lines without scrolling horizontally.
anonymous
276
Has offline voice recognition
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Offline voice recognition enables you to perform voice actions, like dictating texts or using various voice commands, without an internet connection.
anonymous
116
Supports bookmarks sync across different devices
Comment
Yes
vs
No
anonymous
89
You can customize your notifications, e.g. turn off notifications on an app specific basis
Comment
Yes
vs
No
anonymous
58
You can take a screenshot of your phone's screen
Comment
Yes
vs
No

Samsung Galaxy S II Lite is better than Samsung Galaxy SII because...

Yes
vs
No

Please choose the related object

Top 21 Reasons for the

Samsung Galaxy SII

Compared to Samsung Galaxy S II Lite

anonymous
3249
A tad more battery power
Comment
1650 mAh
vs
1500 mAh
10% more battery power
anonymous
2640
Faster CPU clock speed
Comment
2 x 1.2 GHz
vs
2 x 1 GHz
20% faster CPU clock speed
anonymous
1826
Modestly bigger screen size
Comment
4.3 "
vs
4 "
7.50% bigger screen size. The bigger the screen size is, the better the user experience.
anonymous
1615
Noticeably more megapixels (photo)
Comment
8 MP
vs
5 MP
1.60x more megapixels (photo)
anonymous
1591
More RAM memory
Comment
1 GB
vs
0.768 GB
0.23 GB more RAM memory
anonymous
1280
Sizably more megapixel (photo, front camera)
Comment
2 MP
vs
1.3 MP
1.54x more megapixel (photo, front camera)
anonymous
998
Has branded damage resistant glass
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Damage resistant glass (such as Corning Gorilla Glass or Asahi Dragontail Glass) is thin and lightweight, and can withstand high levels of force.
anonymous
883
Somewhat lighter
Comment
116 g
vs
120 g
4 g lighter
anonymous
751
Thinner
Comment
8.5 mm
vs
9.7 mm
1.20 mm thinner
anonymous
615
Noticeably faster downloads
Comment
21 MBits/s
vs
14.4 MBits/s
45.83% faster downloads
anonymous
537
Is DLNA certified
Comment
Yes
vs
No
All DLNA certified products are compatible with one another. When different devices are connected to the same network, data can be transferred easily between them.
anonymous
490
Sizably better video recording quality
Comment
1080 x 30 fps
vs
720 x 30 fps
1.50x better video recording quality
anonymous
426
Has NFC
Comment
Yes
vs
No
NFC (near field communication) allows a device to perform simple wireless transactions.
anonymous
254
Explicitly more microphone(s)
Comment
2
vs
1
1 more microphone(s). More microphones result in better sound quality and enable the device to filter out background noise.
anonymous
124
Marginally lower SAR for body (USA)
Comment
0.96 W/kg
vs
0.98 W/kg
0.02 W/kg lower SAR for body (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at hip level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.
anonymous
109
Explicitly lower SAR for head (USA)
Comment
0.16 W/kg
vs
0.37 W/kg
0.21 W/kg lower SAR for head (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.
anonymous
101
Plays Adobe Flash
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Adobe Flash with video and sound is supported in the device's browser.
anonymous
91
Vastly lower SAR for head (EU)
Comment
0.34 W/kg
vs
0.54 W/kg
0.20 W/kg lower SAR for head (EU). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 2.0 W/kg in the EU.
anonymous
57
A little bit less body volume
Comment
70.3 cm³
vs
75.29 cm³
7.10% less body volume
Anubhav Karanseth
7
Has more Custom Roms on XDA Developers
Comment
Yes
vs
No
ﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞ
2
Possibility of using the Origami exclusive case
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The Origami case can be folded in both positions, horizontal and vertical. It protects the ereader and allows you to set the better position for reading, watching videos... etc.

Samsung Galaxy SII is better than Samsung Galaxy S II Lite because...

Yes
vs
No

Please choose the related object

x
Join