Download the official Versus Android app now Android app on Google Play

Samsung Galaxy S2 vs Sony Xperia T

Top 13 Reasons for the

Samsung Galaxy S2

Compared to Sony Xperia T

anonymous
589
Significantly more megapixel (photo, front camera)
2 MP
vs
1.3 MP
1.54x more megapixel (photo, front camera)
anonymous
551
Has branded damage resistant glass
Yes
vs
No
Damage resistant glass (such as Corning Gorilla Glass or Asahi Dragontail Glass) is thin and lightweight, and can withstand high levels of force.
anonymous
460
Has a removable battery
Yes
vs
No
The battery is removable and can be replaced by the user if broken.
anonymous
310
Lighter
116 g
vs
139 g
23 g lighter
anonymous
300
Marginally thinner
8.5 mm
vs
9.4 mm
0.90 mm thinner
anonymous
88
Appreciably lower SAR for head (USA)
0.16 W/kg
vs
1.07 W/kg
0.91 W/kg lower SAR for head (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.
anonymous
71
Significantly lower SAR for head (EU)
0.34 W/kg
vs
0.85 W/kg
0.51 W/kg lower SAR for head (EU). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 2.0 W/kg in the EU.
Jurgen Domehl
3
Has more Custom Roms on XDA Developers
Yes
vs
No
Edwan
1
Your Grandfather will like it
Yes
vs
No
Because its a older phone
Edwan
1
Not Support Update Software
Yes
vs
No
Make you exhausted for the Android
anonymous
-152
A little narrower
66.1 mm
vs
67.3 mm
1.20 mm narrower
anonymous
-203
Way less body volume
70.3 cm³
vs
91.01 cm³
29.46% less body volume
anonymous
-223
A tad shorter
125.3 mm
vs
129.4 mm
4.10 mm shorter

Samsung Galaxy S2 is better than Sony Xperia T because...

Yes
vs
No

Top 27 Reasons for the

Sony Xperia T

Compared to Samsung Galaxy S2

anonymous
1862
More battery power
1850 mAh
vs
1650 mAh
12.12% more battery power
anonymous
1198
Significantly higher pixel density
323 ppi
vs
218 ppi
48.17% higher pixel density
anonymous
909
A bit bigger screen size
4.55 "
vs
4.3 "
5.81% bigger screen size. The bigger the screen size is, the better the user experience.
anonymous
871
Measurably higher resolution
1280x720 px
vs
800x480 px
2.40x higher resolution
anonymous
863
Measurably more megapixels (photo)
13 MP
vs
8 MP
1.63x more megapixels (photo)
anonymous
552
Every pixel has three subpixels
Yes
vs
No
The device has a display with three full subpixels per pixel, resulting in a sharp and crisp picture. Pixels in some displays (like AMOLED) share one subpixel to preserve space. This can result in a less crisp, slightly blurred image.
anonymous
448
Has stereo speakers
Yes
vs
No
Devices with stereo speakers deliver sound that surrounds the user from left and right side, creating a richer sound and a better experience.
anonymous
393
Significantly faster downloads
42.2 MBits/s
vs
21 MBits/s
2.01x faster downloads