Top Nine Reasons for the Samsung Galaxy S3 Mini

Top 26 Reasons for the Sony Xperia TX

 
 
Which is better? Show result
0
0

Embed this comparison:

Samsung Galaxy S3 Mini vs Sony Xperia TX

Top Nine Reasons for the

Samsung Galaxy S3 Mini

Compared to Sony Xperia TX

anonymous
1003
Has branded damage resistant glass
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Damage resistant glass (such as Corning Gorilla Glass or Asahi Dragontail Glass) is thin and lightweight, and can withstand high levels of force.
anonymous
889
A bit lighter
Comment
120 g
vs
127 g
7 g lighter
anonymous
277
Explicitly narrower
Comment
63 mm
vs
68.6 mm
5.60 mm narrower
anonymous
249
Newer Bluetooth version
Comment
4
vs
3.1
Newer Bluetooth version
anonymous
216
Shorter
Comment
121.6 mm
vs
131 mm
9.40 mm shorter
anonymous
185
Has a serial shot mode
Comment
Yes
vs
No
You can shoot multiple pictures in a row.
anonymous
159
Has a built-in HDR mode
Comment
Yes
vs
No
It can automatically shoot pictures with a higher dynamic range (HDR).
Mohamed Ahmed Mazen
7
Smaller in the hand
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Easier to use.
Jay Astarte
1
One of the colour options is pebble blue.
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Aesthetics are important, too.

Samsung Galaxy S3 Mini is better than Sony Xperia TX because...

Yes
vs
No

Please choose the related object

Top 26 Reasons for the

Sony Xperia TX

Compared to Samsung Galaxy S3 Mini

anonymous
3264
More battery power
Comment
1750 mAh
vs
1500 mAh
16.67% more battery power
anonymous
2654
Significantly faster CPU clock speed
Comment
2 x 1.5 GHz
vs
2 x 1 GHz
1.50x faster CPU clock speed
anonymous
2243
Plenty higher pixel density
Comment
323 ppi
vs
233 ppi
38.63% higher pixel density
anonymous
1830
Bigger screen size
Comment
4.55 "
vs
4 "
13.75% bigger screen size. The bigger the screen size is, the better the user experience.
anonymous
1617
Significantly more megapixels (photo)
Comment
13 MP
vs
5 MP
2.60x more megapixels (photo)
anonymous
1537
Notably higher resolution
Comment
1280x720 px
vs
800x480 px
2.40x higher resolution
anonymous
1286
Notably more megapixel (photo, front camera)
Comment
1.3 MP
vs
0.3 MP
4.33x more megapixel (photo, front camera)
anonymous
967
Every pixel has three subpixels.
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The device has a display with three full subpixels per pixel, resulting in a sharp and crisp picture. Pixels in some displays (like AMOLED) share one subpixel to preserve space. This can result in a less crisp, slightly blurred image.
anonymous
820
Has stereo speakers
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Devices with stereo speakers deliver sound that surrounds the user from left and right side, creating a richer sound and a better experience.
anonymous
754
Thinner
Comment
8.6 mm
vs
9.9 mm
1.30 mm thinner
anonymous
616
Vastly faster downloads
Comment
42.2 MBits/s
vs
21 MBits/s
2.01x faster downloads
anonymous
528
Has a dedicated camera button
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A dedicated camera button allows you to take snapshots more easily.
anonymous
493
Substantially better video recording quality
Comment
1080 x 30 fps
vs
720 x 30 fps
1.50x better video recording quality
anonymous
370
Wider aperture at minimum focal length
Comment
2.4
vs
2.6
Wider aperture at minimum focal length. With a wider aperture the sensor can capture more light, helping to avoid blur by enabling a faster shutter speed. It also provides a shallow depth of field, allowing you to blur the background to focus attention on the subject.
anonymous
261
Has continuous autofocus when recording movies
Comment
Yes
vs
No
When recording movies they stay focussed and sharp.
anonymous
240
Has a video light
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A video light helps when recording a movie in low-light situation like a party.
anonymous
231
Clearly smaller semiconductor size
Comment
28 nm
vs
32 nm
4 nm smaller semiconductor size. A smaller size indicates that the process to create the chip is newer.
anonymous
206
Has a CMOS sensor
Comment
Yes
vs
No
CMOS image sensors are slowly replacing CCD sensors, due to reduced power consumption and better image quality. They can be very compact and cost relatively little to produce.
anonymous
58
Slightly less body volume
Comment
77.28 cm³
vs
82.9 cm³
7.27% less body volume
anonymous
35
Displays 3D
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The device can display 3D images without the need for wearing special 3D glasses. The display's special construction allows viewers to get a sense of an image´s depth by tailoring its position to fit the user's perspective.
Legña Rosero Pablo
34
PlayStation Mobile Certified
Comment
Yes
vs
No
This Xperia can play apps & games from PlayStation Mobile platform. US/EU PSN ID is required to use this feature.
Gabriel Satrio Wibowo
4
Support screen mirroring
Comment
Yes
vs
No
You can play games on Sony TV wirelessly, without using any cable.
Gabriel Satrio Wibowo
2
Better screen
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Sony uses different panel while making the 2012 Xperias and 2013 Xperias. Meanwhile, the panel which is use on 2012 Xperias are much better. The 2013 Xperia's display looks washed out like the Xperia Z
Legña Rosero Pablo
2
Kit Kat
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Running latest android OS
Gabriel Satrio Wibowo
1
Elegant Body
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The body looks more elegant than the competitors.
Gabriel Satrio Wibowo
1
Better earphone
Comment
Yes
vs
No
When you buy the device, you get the Sony MH750 which is better than Samsung's or other Sony midrange device.
Show more reasons

Sony Xperia TX is better than Samsung Galaxy S3 Mini because...

Yes
vs
No

Please choose the related object

x
Join