Top 25 Reasons for the Samsung Galaxy S3

Top Twelve Reasons for the HTC One X

 
 
Which is better? Show result
0
0

Samsung Galaxy S3 vs HTC One X

Top 25 Reasons for the

Samsung Galaxy S3

Compared to HTC One X

3568
More battery power
Comment
2100 mAh
vs
1800 mAh
16.67% more battery power

×

2021
Modestly bigger screen size
Comment
4.8 "
vs
4.7 "
2.13% bigger screen size. The bigger the screen size is, the better the user experience.

×

1430
Substantially more megapixel (photo, front camera)
Comment
1.9 MP
vs
1.3 MP
46.15% more megapixel (photo, front camera)

×

1368
Has an external memory slot
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The device has a standard memory slot (such as an SD or micro SD card slot) so that you can either extend the internal storage with affordable memory modules or you can retrieve data, such as photographs, easily from a memory card.

×

976
Has a removable battery
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The battery is removable and can be replaced by the user if broken.

×

862
A bit thinner
Comment
8.6 mm
vs
8.9 mm
0.30 mm thinner

×

542
Better video recording quality
Comment
1080 x 30 fps
vs
1080 x 24 fps
25% better video recording quality

×

293
Has continuous autofocus when recording movies
Comment
Yes
vs
No
When recording movies they stay focussed and sharp.

×

266
Has a video light
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A video light helps when recording a movie in low-light situation like a party.

×

249
Significantly smaller semiconductor size
Comment
32 nm
vs
40 nm
8 nm smaller semiconductor size. A smaller size indicates that the process to create the chip is newer.

×

220
Has a CMOS sensor
Comment
Yes
vs
No
CMOS image sensors are slowly replacing CCD sensors, due to reduced power consumption and better image quality. They can be very compact and cost relatively little to produce.

×

112
Sizably lower SAR for head (USA)
Comment
0.55 W/kg
vs
0.68 W/kg
0.13 W/kg lower SAR for head (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.

×

94
Substantially lower SAR for head (EU)
Comment
0.21 W/kg
vs
0.68 W/kg
0.47 W/kg lower SAR for head (EU). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 2.0 W/kg in the EU.

×

90
Marginally less body volume
Comment
82.94 cm³
vs
84.4 cm³
1.76% less body volume

×

Mayschell Mahammed
10
Smart stay
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The screen switchws off if you are not looking at it

×

Drini Nosi
3
Has Radio
Comment
Yes
vs
No

×

Dami Agunbiade
3
Zero Shutter Lag
Comment
Yes
vs
No
This means photos are much more sharper and can be taken in less than 0.5 seconds

×

Adrian Carrillo
2
Notification light
Comment
Yes
vs
No

×

Jadian JaJa Clarke
2
Body has perfect size–not too big
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The size is much bigger ,which can be suitable or unsuitable.

×

Sacha Tremblay
1
Louder speaker
Comment
Yes
vs
No
This speaker is louder and clearer

×

Sacha Tremblay
1
LED light
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Able to see notification without turning on the screen

×

Samsung Exynos 4412
Yes
vs
No
Top 1 Reason for Samsung Exynos 4412
160
Has integrated graphics
Comment
Yes
vs
No
With integrated graphics you don’t need to buy a separate graphics card.

×

ARM Cortex-A9
Yes
vs
No
Top 3 Reasons for ARM Cortex-A9
109
Has NX bit
Comment
Yes
vs
No
NX bit helps protect the computer from malicious attacks.

×

106
Has out-of-order execution
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Out-of-order execution is used in CPUs to make use of instruction cycles that would normally be wasted due to delays.

×

106
Has TrustZone
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).

×

Samsung Galaxy S3 is better than HTC One X because...

Yes
vs
No

Please choose the related object

Top Twelve Reasons for the

HTC One X

Compared to Samsung Galaxy S3

2885
A shade faster CPU clock speed
Comment
4 x 1.5 GHz
vs
4 x 1.4 GHz
7.14% faster CPU clock speed

×

2443
A tad higher pixel density
Comment
312 ppi
vs
306 ppi
1.96% higher pixel density

×

1055
Every pixel has three subpixels.
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The device has a display with three full subpixels per pixel, resulting in a sharp and crisp picture. Pixels in some displays (like AMOLED) share one subpixel to preserve space. This can result in a less crisp, slightly blurred image.

×

1017
A tad lighter
Comment
130 g
vs
133 g
3 g lighter

×

718
Significantly more internal storage
Comment
32 GB
vs
16 GB
16 GB more internal storage

×

651
Has a radio
Comment
Yes
vs
No
It works as an FM radio with included headsets

×

539
Has an IPS screen
Comment
Yes
vs
No
IPS (In-Plane Switching) is a technology used for LCDs. It was designed to overcome the main limitations of normal TFTs TN-matrices: relatively slow response times, small viewing angles and low quality color reproduction.

×

351
A little bit narrower
Comment
69.9 mm
vs
70.6 mm
0.70 mm narrower

×

282
Marginally shorter
Comment
134.4 mm
vs
136.6 mm
2.20 mm shorter

×

133
Significantly lower SAR for body (USA)
Comment
0.7 W/kg
vs
1.49 W/kg
0.79 W/kg lower SAR for body (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at hip level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.

×

108
Plays Adobe Flash
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Adobe Flash with video and sound is supported in the device's browser.

×

Aidonia Kartel Abirigo
1
Beats Audio
Comment
Yes
vs
No
With the help of the beats audio, htc one x produces much more better sound as compared to htc sensation

×

HTC One X is better than Samsung Galaxy S3 because...

Yes
vs
No

Please choose the related object

x
Join