Samsung Galaxy S3 vs HTC One X

Top 14 Reasons for the

Samsung Galaxy S3

Compared to HTC One X

anonymous
1059
More battery power
2100 mAh
vs
1800 mAh
16.67% more battery power
anonymous
465
A little bigger screen size
4.8 "
vs
4.7 "
2.13% bigger screen size. The bigger the screen size is, the better the user experience.
anonymous
442
Has an external memory slot
Yes
vs
No
The device has a standard memory slot (such as an SD or micro SD card slot) so that you can either extend the internal storage with affordable memory modules or you can retrieve data, such as photographs, easily from a memory card.
anonymous
276
Measurably more megapixel (photo, front camera)
1.9 MP
vs
1.3 MP
46.15% more megapixel (photo, front camera)
anonymous
241
Has a removable battery
Yes
vs
No
The battery is removable and can be replaced by the user if broken.
anonymous
138
Better video recording quality
1080 x 30 fps
vs
1080 x 24 fps
25% better video recording quality
anonymous
95
Has continuous autofocus when recording movies
Yes
vs
No
When recording movies they stay focussed and sharp.
anonymous
92
A shade thinner
8.6 mm
vs
8.9 mm
0.30 mm thinner
anonymous
81
Significantly smaller semiconductor size
32 nm
vs
40 nm
8 nm smaller semiconductor size. A smaller size indicates that the process to create the chip is newer.
anonymous
61
Has a CMOS sensor
Yes
vs
No
CMOS image sensors are slowly replacing CCD sensors, due to reduced power consumption and better image quality. They can be very compact and cost relatively little to produce.
anonymous
55
Appreciably lower SAR for head (USA)
0.55 W/kg
vs
0.68 W/kg
0.13 W/kg lower SAR for head (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.
anonymous
54
Has a video light
Yes
vs
No
A video light helps when recording a movie in low-light situation like a party.
anonymous
43
Notably lower SAR for head (EU)
0.21 W/kg
vs
0.68 W/kg
0.47 W/kg lower SAR for head (EU). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 2.0 W/kg in the EU.
Vishal Kumar Singh
0
Has a Super AMOLED Plus
Yes
vs
No
This screen has better contrast of colours
Vishal Kumar Singh
0
Better GPU Mali 400mp
Yes
vs
No
S3 has Quad core graphics while Z10 has old Adreno 225 GPU.
Jordan Conkle
0
It's bigger and lighter
Yes
vs
No
Easy to navigate around
Hossam Arafa AbdelRehim
-1
S features
Yes
vs
No
Such as Stay awake, S Voice, Direct call, S Beam, Smart alert, AllShare cast, Pop-up play
Carlos Santiago Tarifa Rey-Stolle
-2
Supports controllers
Yes
vs
No
The system supports usb controllers, so you can play games with real controls instead of the touchscreen
Vishal Kumar Singh
-2
Supports S beam
Yes
vs
No
Can send big sized data files faster through S beam.
Vishal Kumar Singh
-2
Android, so more apps
Yes
vs
No
Android market has 1,000,000 apps available as on July 2013
Jabir Jabirpanthakkan
-2
Has Microsoft Office
Yes
vs
No
This is great if you use your device for work.
Marco Lackovic
-4
Can have a spare battery
Yes
vs
No
Having a spare battery (1) doubles the operating time allowing to use the phone stress-free and its full potential, and (2) makes it possible to use the phone unplugged while charging the other battery on an external charger.
Carlos Santiago Tarifa Rey-Stolle
-8
Has a notification LED
Yes
vs
No
The LED light alerts you to missed notifications
Qu Setia Menanti
-8
Too mainstream
Yes
vs
No
Cause lenovo is shit
Razvan Socol
-13
NFC
Yes
vs
No
NFC for fastest sharing
Show more reasons

Samsung Galaxy S3 is better than HTC One X because...

Yes
vs
No

Top Ten Reasons for the

HTC One X

Compared to Samsung Galaxy S3

anonymous
824
A tad faster CPU clock speed
4 x 1.5 GHz
vs
4 x 1.4 GHz
7.14% faster CPU clock speed
anonymous
662
Modestly higher pixel density
312 ppi
vs
306 ppi
1.96% higher pixel density
anonymous
312
Every pixel has three subpixels
Yes
vs
No
The device has a display with three full subpixels per pixel, resulting in a sharp and crisp picture. Pixels in some displays (like AMOLED) share one subpixel to preserve space. This can result in a less crisp, slightly blurred image.
anonymous
149
Considerably more internal storage
32 GB
vs
16 GB
16 GB more internal storage
anonymous
129
Has a radio
Yes
vs
No
It works as an FM radio with included headsets
anonymous
101
Has an IPS screen
Yes
vs
No
IPS (In-Plane Switching) is a technology used for LCDs. It was designed to overcome the main limitations of normal TFTs TN-matrices: relatively slow response times, small viewing angles and low quality color reproduction.
anonymous
81
Modestly lighter
130 g
vs
133 g
3 g lighter
anonymous
64
Distinctly lower SAR for body (USA)
0.7 W/kg
vs
1.49 W/kg
0.79 W/kg lower SAR for body (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at hip level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.
Max Leiva
-1
Build Quality in Much Higher
Yes
vs
No
Because used materials are toughter, policarbonate is much better than the cheap plastic used in every single Samsung Galaxy series. The bad quality plastic and paint on the Galaxy's ALWAYS gets marks and breaks.
anonymous
-354
A little narrower
69.9 mm
vs
70.6 mm
0.70 mm narrower
anonymous
-398
A bit shorter
134.4 mm
vs
136.6 mm
2.20 mm shorter

HTC One X is better than Samsung Galaxy S3 because...

Yes
vs
No

Compare with other products

x
Join