Samsung Galaxy S3 vs HTC One X

Top 20 Reasons for the

Samsung Galaxy S3

Compared to HTC One X

anonymous
2807
More battery power
Comment
2100 mAh
vs
1800 mAh
16.67% more battery power
anonymous
1523
Marginally bigger screen size
Comment
4.8 "
vs
4.7 "
2.13% bigger screen size. The bigger the screen size is, the better the user experience.
anonymous
1082
Has an external memory slot
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The device has a standard memory slot (such as an SD or micro SD card slot) so that you can either extend the internal storage with affordable memory modules or you can retrieve data, such as photographs, easily from a memory card.
anonymous
1072
Distinctly more megapixel (photo, front camera)
Comment
1.9 MP
vs
1.3 MP
46.15% more megapixel (photo, front camera)
anonymous
756
Has a removable battery
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The battery is removable and can be replaced by the user if broken.
anonymous
593
A little bit thinner
Comment
8.6 mm
vs
8.9 mm
0.30 mm thinner
anonymous
429
Better video recording quality
Comment
1080 x 30 fps
vs
1080 x 24 fps
25% better video recording quality
anonymous
224
Has continuous autofocus when recording movies
Comment
Yes
vs
No
When recording movies they stay focussed and sharp.
anonymous
202
Has a video light
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A video light helps when recording a movie in low-light situation like a party.
anonymous
187
Measurably smaller semiconductor size
Comment
32 nm
vs
40 nm
8 nm smaller semiconductor size. A smaller size indicates that the process to create the chip is newer.
anonymous
178
Has a CMOS sensor
Comment
Yes
vs
No
CMOS image sensors are slowly replacing CCD sensors, due to reduced power consumption and better image quality. They can be very compact and cost relatively little to produce.
anonymous
107
Notably lower SAR for head (USA)
Comment
0.55 W/kg
vs
0.68 W/kg
0.13 W/kg lower SAR for head (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.
anonymous
85
Significantly lower SAR for head (EU)
Comment
0.21 W/kg
vs
0.68 W/kg
0.47 W/kg lower SAR for head (EU). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 2.0 W/kg in the EU.
anonymous
8
A little less body volume
Comment
82.94 cm³
vs
84.4 cm³
1.76% less body volume
Rockingrocking Boy Aakshay
5
Good pic capture at night
Comment
Yes
vs
No
It has better camera at night
Dami Agunbiade
2
Zero Shutter Lag
Comment
Yes
vs
No
This means photos are much more sharper and can be taken in less than 0.5 seconds
Samsung Exynos 4412
Yes
vs
No
Top 1 Reason for Samsung Exynos 4412
anonymous
117
Has integrated graphics
Comment
Yes
vs
No
With integrated graphics you don’t need to buy a separate graphics card.
ARM Cortex-A9
Yes
vs
No
Top 3 Reasons for ARM Cortex-A9
anonymous
75
Has NX bit
Comment
Yes
vs
No
NX bit helps protect the computer from malicious attacks.
anonymous
71
Has out-of-order execution
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Out-of-order execution is used in CPUs to make use of instruction cycles that would normally be wasted due to delays.
anonymous
71
Has TrustZone
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).

Samsung Galaxy S3 is better than HTC One X because...

Yes
vs
No

Top Eleven Reasons for the

HTC One X

Compared to Samsung Galaxy S3

anonymous
2259
A tad faster CPU clock speed
Comment
4 x 1.5 GHz
vs
4 x 1.4 GHz
7.14% faster CPU clock speed
anonymous
1899
A bit higher pixel density
Comment
312 ppi
vs
306 ppi
1.96% higher pixel density
anonymous
817
Every pixel has three subpixels.
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The device has a display with three full subpixels per pixel, resulting in a sharp and crisp picture. Pixels in some displays (like AMOLED) share one subpixel to preserve space. This can result in a less crisp, slightly blurred image.
anonymous
689
Slightly lighter
Comment
130 g
vs
133 g
3 g lighter
anonymous
524
Considerably more internal storage
Comment
32 GB
vs
16 GB
16 GB more internal storage
anonymous
478
Has a radio
Comment
Yes
vs
No
It works as an FM radio with included headsets
anonymous
422
Has an IPS screen
Comment
Yes
vs
No
IPS (In-Plane Switching) is a technology used for LCDs. It was designed to overcome the main limitations of normal TFTs TN-matrices: relatively slow response times, small viewing angles and low quality color reproduction.
anonymous
147
A shade narrower
Comment
69.9 mm
vs
70.6 mm
0.70 mm narrower
anonymous
116
Significantly lower SAR for body (USA)
Comment
0.7 W/kg
vs
1.49 W/kg
0.79 W/kg lower SAR for body (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at hip level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.
anonymous
91
A little bit shorter
Comment
134.4 mm
vs
136.6 mm
2.20 mm shorter
anonymous
87
Plays Adobe Flash
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Adobe Flash with video and sound is supported in the device's browser.

HTC One X is better than Samsung Galaxy S3 because...

Yes
vs
No

Compare with other products

x
Join