Download the official Versus Android app now Android app on Google Play

Samsung Galaxy S3 vs HTC One X

Top 20 Reasons for the

Samsung Galaxy S3

Compared to HTC One X

anonymous
1948
More battery power
2100 mAh
vs
1800 mAh
16.67% more battery power
anonymous
959
Marginally bigger screen size
4.8 "
vs
4.7 "
2.13% bigger screen size. The bigger the screen size is, the better the user experience.
anonymous
727
Has an external memory slot
Yes
vs
No
The device has a standard memory slot (such as an SD or micro SD card slot) so that you can either extend the internal storage with affordable memory modules or you can retrieve data, such as photographs, easily from a memory card.
anonymous
623
Explicitly more megapixel (photo, front camera)
1.9 MP
vs
1.3 MP
46.15% more megapixel (photo, front camera)
anonymous
477
Has a removable battery
Yes
vs
No
The battery is removable and can be replaced by the user if broken.
anonymous
318
Modestly thinner
8.6 mm
vs
8.9 mm
0.30 mm thinner
anonymous
295
Better video recording quality
1080 x 30 fps
vs
1080 x 24 fps
25% better video recording quality
anonymous
158
Has continuous autofocus when recording movies
Yes
vs
No
When recording movies they stay focussed and sharp.
anonymous
129
Notably smaller semiconductor size
32 nm
vs
40 nm
8 nm smaller semiconductor size. A smaller size indicates that the process to create the chip is newer.
anonymous
127
Has a video light
Yes
vs
No
A video light helps when recording a movie in low-light situation like a party.
anonymous
122
Has a CMOS sensor
Yes
vs
No
CMOS image sensors are slowly replacing CCD sensors, due to reduced power consumption and better image quality. They can be very compact and cost relatively little to produce.
anonymous
89
Sizably lower SAR for head (USA)
0.55 W/kg
vs
0.68 W/kg
0.13 W/kg lower SAR for head (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.
anonymous
72
Substantially lower SAR for head (EU)
0.21 W/kg
vs
0.68 W/kg
0.47 W/kg lower SAR for head (EU). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 2.0 W/kg in the EU.
Carlos Santiago Tarifa Rey-Stolle
1
Supports controllers
Yes
vs
No
The system supports usb controllers, so you can play games with real controls instead of the touchscreen
Sourab Banerjee
1
Better gpu mali 400 mp4
Yes
vs
No
Ana D'Angiolella
0
Better sound quality
Yes
vs
No
Using the Sennheiser's own transducer to deliver the best quality sound
anonymous
-184
Marginally less body volume
82.94 cm³
vs
84.4 cm³
1.76% less body volume
Samsung Exynos 4412
Yes
vs
No
Top 1 Reason for Samsung Exynos 4412
anonymous
59
Has integrated graphics
Yes
vs
No
With integrated graphics you don’t need to buy a separate graphics card.
ARM Cortex-A9
Yes
vs
No
Top 3 Reasons for ARM Cortex-A9
anonymous
41
Has NX bit
Yes
vs
No
NX bit helps protect the computer from malicious attacks.
anonymous
40
Has TrustZone
Yes
vs
No
A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).
anonymous
39
Has out-of-order execution
Yes
vs
No
Out-of-order execution is used in CPUs to make use of instruction cycles that would normally be wasted due to delays.

Samsung Galaxy S3 is better than HTC One X because...

Yes
vs
No

Top Ten Reasons for the

HTC One X

Compared to Samsung Galaxy S3

anonymous
1503
A shade faster CPU clock speed
4 x 1.5 GHz
vs
4 x 1.4 GHz
7.14% faster CPU clock speed
anonymous
1240
A bit higher pixel density
312 ppi
vs
306 ppi
1.96% higher pixel density
anonymous
567
Every pixel has three subpixels
Yes
vs
No
The device has a display with three full subpixels per pixel, resulting in a sharp and crisp picture. Pixels in some displays (like AMOLED) share one subpixel to preserve space. This can result in a less crisp, slightly blurred image.
anonymous
331
A little bit lighter
130 g
vs
133 g
3 g lighter
anonymous
323
Sizably more internal storage
32 GB
vs
16 GB
16 GB more internal storage
anonymous
295
Has a radio
Yes
vs
No
It works as an FM radio with included headsets
anonymous
267
Has an IPS screen
Yes
vs
No
IPS (In-Plane Switching) is a technology used for LCDs. It was designed to overcome the main limitations of normal TFTs TN-matrices: relatively slow response times, small viewing angles and low quality color reproduction.
anonymous
100
Substantially lower SAR for body (USA)
0.7 W/kg
vs
1.49 W/kg
0.79 W/kg lower SAR for body (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at hip level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.
Max Leiva
0
Build Quality in Much Higher
Yes
vs
No
Because used materials are toughter, policarbonate is much better than the cheap plastic used in every single Samsung Galaxy series. The bad quality plastic and paint on the Galaxy's ALWAYS gets marks and breaks.
anonymous
-118
Marginally narrower
69.9 mm
vs
70.6 mm
0.70 mm narrower
anonymous
-196
Modestly shorter
134.4 mm
vs
136.6 mm
2.20 mm shorter

HTC One X is better than Samsung Galaxy S3 because...

Yes
vs
No

Compare with other products

x
Join