Samsung Galaxy S3 vs Motorola Moto G

Top 21 Reasons for the

Samsung Galaxy S3

Compared to Motorola Moto G

anonymous
2748
A little bit more battery power
Comment
2100 mAh
vs
2070 mAh
1.45% more battery power
anonymous
2195
Faster CPU clock speed
Comment
4 x 1.4 GHz
vs
4 x 1.2 GHz
16.67% faster CPU clock speed
anonymous
1475
Modestly bigger screen size
Comment
4.8 "
vs
4.5 "
6.67% bigger screen size. The bigger the screen size is, the better the user experience.
anonymous
1340
Notably more megapixels (photo)
Comment
8 MP
vs
5 MP
1.60x more megapixels (photo)
anonymous
1056
Has an external memory slot
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The device has a standard memory slot (such as an SD or micro SD card slot) so that you can either extend the internal storage with affordable memory modules or you can retrieve data, such as photographs, easily from a memory card.
anonymous
1041
Considerably more megapixel (photo, front camera)
Comment
1.9 MP
vs
1.3 MP
46.15% more megapixel (photo, front camera)
anonymous
735
Has a removable battery
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The battery is removable and can be replaced by the user if broken.
anonymous
664
Somewhat lighter
Comment
133 g
vs
143 g
10 g lighter
anonymous
566
A lot thinner
Comment
8.6 mm
vs
11.6 mm
3 mm thinner
anonymous
470
Is DLNA certified
Comment
Yes
vs
No
All DLNA certified products are compatible with one another. When different devices are connected to the same network, data can be transferred easily between them.
anonymous
413
Clearly better video recording quality
Comment
1080 x 30 fps
vs
720 x 30 fps
1.50x better video recording quality
anonymous
243
Has a BSI sensor
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A BSI (backside illuminated) sensor is a camera image sensor which captures better quality images in poor lighting conditions, and offers better overall sharpness and image quality.
anonymous
192
Has a video light
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A video light helps when recording a movie in low-light situation like a party.
anonymous
172
Has a CMOS sensor
Comment
Yes
vs
No
CMOS image sensors are slowly replacing CCD sensors, due to reduced power consumption and better image quality. They can be very compact and cost relatively little to produce.
anonymous
154
Has manual ISO
Comment
Yes
vs
No
This allows to manually set the ISO level.
anonymous
106
Measurably lower SAR for head (USA)
Comment
0.55 W/kg
vs
1.17 W/kg
0.62 W/kg lower SAR for head (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.
anonymous
85
Sizably lower SAR for head (EU)
Comment
0.21 W/kg
vs
0.79 W/kg
0.58 W/kg lower SAR for head (EU). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 2.0 W/kg in the EU.
Rockingrocking Boy Aakshay
5
Good pic capture at night
Comment
Yes
vs
No
It has better camera at night
Dami Agunbiade
2
Zero Shutter Lag
Comment
Yes
vs
No
This means photos are much more sharper and can be taken in less than 0.5 seconds
anonymous
-4
Less body volume
Comment
82.94 cm³
vs
99.3 cm³
19.73% less body volume
Samsung Exynos 4412
Yes
vs
No
Top 0 Reasons for Samsung Exynos 4412
ARM Mali 400 MP4
Yes
vs
No
Top 1 Reason for ARM Mali 400 MP4
anonymous
220
Vastly faster GPU clock speed
Comment
533 MHz
vs
450 MHz
83 MHz faster GPU clock speed. The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.

Samsung Galaxy S3 is better than Motorola Moto G because...

Yes
vs
No

Top 23 Reasons for the

Motorola Moto G

Compared to Samsung Galaxy S3

anonymous
1852
A little higher pixel density
Comment
329 ppi
vs
306 ppi
7.52% higher pixel density
anonymous
793
Every pixel has three subpixels.
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The device has a display with three full subpixels per pixel, resulting in a sharp and crisp picture. Pixels in some displays (like AMOLED) share one subpixel to preserve space. This can result in a less crisp, slightly blurred image.
Harutyun Rehanyan
1
Battery lasts three days!new
Comment
Yes
vs
No
One day at 98% battery I turned on the battery saver for the Moto G, and for the next three days (I gamed on it for about 1 hour a day and about 30 minutes of call per day) but of course I turned it off before going to bed and turned it on in mornin
anonymous
458
Has a radio
Comment
Yes
vs
No
It works as an FM radio with included headsets
anonymous
410
Has an IPS screen
Comment
Yes
vs
No
IPS (In-Plane Switching) is a technology used for LCDs. It was designed to overcome the main limitations of normal TFTs TN-matrices: relatively slow response times, small viewing angles and low quality color reproduction.
anonymous
192
Has manual exposure
Comment
Yes
vs
No
This allows to manually set the exposure.
anonymous
187
Explicitly smaller semiconductor size
Comment
28 nm
vs
32 nm
4 nm smaller semiconductor size. A smaller size indicates that the process to create the chip is newer.
anonymous
126
Plenty narrower
Comment
65.9 mm
vs
70.6 mm
4.70 mm narrower
anonymous
115
Notably lower SAR for body (USA)
Comment
1.06 W/kg
vs
1.49 W/kg
0.43 W/kg lower SAR for body (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at hip level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.
anonymous
68
A little bit shorter
Comment
129.9 mm
vs
136.6 mm
6.70 mm shorter
Darshil Shah
9
Upto Date Phone
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Android 4.4.4
Dhrumil Bhavsar
6
Slow motion video recording
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Prabhnoor Singh
4
More crisp screen
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Gautham Krishna K
3
Cheap but effecient
Comment
Yes
vs
No
It goes off on a very reasonable price but has incredible specs
Vitor Almeida Gomes
1
Menor
Comment
Yes
vs
No
O moto g cabe em quase todos os bolsos por nao ser tao grande
Android 4.4 KitKat (API level 19)
Yes
vs
No
Top 3 Reasons for Android 4.4 KitKat (API level 19)
anonymous
552
Supports 4K resolution
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Allows you to view in ultra-high definition.
anonymous
268
Is a multi-user system
Comment
Yes
vs
No
anonymous
252
Supports OpenGL ES 3.0, allowing for improved game graphics
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8226 (1.2GHz)
Yes
vs
No
Top 0 Reasons for Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8226 (1.2GHz)
ARM Cortex-A7
Yes
vs
No
Top 2 Reasons for ARM Cortex-A7
anonymous
91
Has dynamic frequency scaling
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Dynamic frequency scaling is a technology that allows the processor to conserve power and reduce noise when it is under a light load.
anonymous
38
Explicitly newer version of VFP
Comment
4
vs
3
1 newer version of VFP. Vector Floating-Point (VFP) is used by the processor to deliver increased performance in areas such as digital imaging.
Qualcomm Adreno 305
Yes
vs
No
Top 3 Reasons for Qualcomm Adreno 305
anonymous
116
Much higher floating-point performance
Comment
0.0216 TFLOPS
vs
0.02 TFLOPS
0 TFLOPS higher floating-point performance. Floating-point performance is a measurement of the raw processing power of the GPU.
anonymous
77
Sizably higher pixel rate
Comment
0.8 GPixel/s
vs
0.5 GPixel/s
0.30 GPixel/s higher pixel rate. The number of pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.
anonymous
50
Newer version of OpenVG
Comment
3
vs
1.1
Newer version of OpenVG. OpenVG is used to improve the rendering of 2D graphics on mobile devices, for example the user interface (UI) on a smartphone.

Motorola Moto G is better than Samsung Galaxy S3 because...

Yes
vs
No

Compare with other products

x
Join