Samsung Galaxy S3 vs Motorola Moto G

Top 21 Reasons for the

Samsung Galaxy S3

Compared to Motorola Moto G

anonymous
2729
Modestly more battery power
Comment
2100 mAh
vs
2070 mAh
1.45% more battery power
anonymous
2179
Faster CPU clock speed
Comment
4 x 1.4 GHz
vs
4 x 1.2 GHz
16.67% faster CPU clock speed
anonymous
1456
Marginally bigger screen size
Comment
4.8 "
vs
4.5 "
6.67% bigger screen size. The bigger the screen size is, the better the user experience.
anonymous
1324
Vastly more megapixels (photo)
Comment
8 MP
vs
5 MP
1.60x more megapixels (photo)
anonymous
1048
Has an external memory slot
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The device has a standard memory slot (such as an SD or micro SD card slot) so that you can either extend the internal storage with affordable memory modules or you can retrieve data, such as photographs, easily from a memory card.
anonymous
1028
Appreciably more megapixel (photo, front camera)
Comment
1.9 MP
vs
1.3 MP
46.15% more megapixel (photo, front camera)
anonymous
733
Has a removable battery
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The battery is removable and can be replaced by the user if broken.
anonymous
658
A bit lighter
Comment
133 g
vs
143 g
10 g lighter
anonymous
561
Plenty thinner
Comment
8.6 mm
vs
11.6 mm
3 mm thinner
anonymous
466
Is DLNA certified
Comment
Yes
vs
No
All DLNA certified products are compatible with one another. When different devices are connected to the same network, data can be transferred easily between them.
anonymous
407
Substantially better video recording quality
Comment
1080 x 30 fps
vs
720 x 30 fps
1.50x better video recording quality
anonymous
242
Has a BSI sensor
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A BSI (backside illuminated) sensor is a camera image sensor which captures better quality images in poor lighting conditions, and offers better overall sharpness and image quality.
anonymous
192
Has a video light
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A video light helps when recording a movie in low-light situation like a party.
anonymous
172
Has a CMOS sensor
Comment
Yes
vs
No
CMOS image sensors are slowly replacing CCD sensors, due to reduced power consumption and better image quality. They can be very compact and cost relatively little to produce.
anonymous
152
Has manual ISO
Comment
Yes
vs
No
This allows to manually set the ISO level.
anonymous
106
Clearly lower SAR for head (USA)
Comment
0.55 W/kg
vs
1.17 W/kg
0.62 W/kg lower SAR for head (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.
anonymous
85
Appreciably lower SAR for head (EU)
Comment
0.21 W/kg
vs
0.79 W/kg
0.58 W/kg lower SAR for head (EU). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 2.0 W/kg in the EU.
Rockingrocking Boy Aakshay
5
Good pic capture at night
Comment
Yes
vs
No
It has better camera at night
Dami Agunbiade
2
Zero Shutter Lag
Comment
Yes
vs
No
This means photos are much more sharper and can be taken in less than 0.5 seconds
anonymous
-10
Less body volume
Comment
82.94 cm³
vs
99.3 cm³
19.73% less body volume
Samsung Exynos 4412
Yes
vs
No
Top 0 Reasons for Samsung Exynos 4412
ARM Mali 400 MP4
Yes
vs
No
Top 1 Reason for ARM Mali 400 MP4
anonymous
217
Significantly faster GPU clock speed
Comment
533 MHz
vs
450 MHz
83 MHz faster GPU clock speed. The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.

Samsung Galaxy S3 is better than Motorola Moto G because...

Yes
vs
No

Top 22 Reasons for the

Motorola Moto G

Compared to Samsung Galaxy S3

anonymous
1838
Marginally higher pixel density
Comment
329 ppi
vs
306 ppi
7.52% higher pixel density
anonymous
787
Every pixel has three subpixels.
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The device has a display with three full subpixels per pixel, resulting in a sharp and crisp picture. Pixels in some displays (like AMOLED) share one subpixel to preserve space. This can result in a less crisp, slightly blurred image.
anonymous
455
Has a radio
Comment
Yes
vs
No
It works as an FM radio with included headsets
anonymous
409
Has an IPS screen
Comment
Yes
vs
No
IPS (In-Plane Switching) is a technology used for LCDs. It was designed to overcome the main limitations of normal TFTs TN-matrices: relatively slow response times, small viewing angles and low quality color reproduction.
anonymous
192
Has manual exposure
Comment
Yes
vs
No
This allows to manually set the exposure.
anonymous
185
Notably smaller semiconductor size
Comment
28 nm
vs
32 nm
4 nm smaller semiconductor size. A smaller size indicates that the process to create the chip is newer.
anonymous
125
Much narrower
Comment
65.9 mm
vs
70.6 mm
4.70 mm narrower
anonymous
115
Measurably lower SAR for body (USA)
Comment
1.06 W/kg
vs
1.49 W/kg
0.43 W/kg lower SAR for body (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at hip level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.
anonymous
68
Marginally shorter
Comment
129.9 mm
vs
136.6 mm
6.70 mm shorter
Darshil Shah
9
Upto Date Phone
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Android 4.4.4
Dhrumil Bhavsar
6
Slow motion video recording
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Prabhnoor Singh
4
More crisp screen
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Gautham Krishna K
3
Cheap but effecient
Comment
Yes
vs
No
It goes off on a very reasonable price but has incredible specs
Vitor Almeida Gomes
1
Menor
Comment
Yes
vs
No
O moto g cabe em quase todos os bolsos por nao ser tao grande
Android 4.4 KitKat (API level 19)
Yes
vs
No
Top 3 Reasons for Android 4.4 KitKat (API level 19)
anonymous
552
Supports 4K resolution
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Allows you to view in ultra-high definition.
anonymous
266
Is a multi-user system
Comment
Yes
vs
No
anonymous
252
Supports OpenGL ES 3.0, allowing for improved game graphics
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8226 (1.2GHz)
Yes
vs
No
Top 0 Reasons for Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8226 (1.2GHz)
ARM Cortex-A7
Yes
vs
No
Top 2 Reasons for ARM Cortex-A7
anonymous
91
Has dynamic frequency scaling
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Dynamic frequency scaling is a technology that allows the processor to conserve power and reduce noise when it is under a light load.
anonymous
38
Clearly newer version of VFP
Comment
4
vs
3
1 newer version of VFP. Vector Floating-Point (VFP) is used by the processor to deliver increased performance in areas such as digital imaging.
Qualcomm Adreno 305
Yes
vs
No
Top 3 Reasons for Qualcomm Adreno 305
anonymous
113
Amply higher floating-point performance
Comment
0.0216 TFLOPS
vs
0.02 TFLOPS
0 TFLOPS higher floating-point performance. Floating-point performance is a measurement of the raw processing power of the GPU.
anonymous
74
Vastly higher pixel rate
Comment
0.8 GPixel/s
vs
0.5 GPixel/s
0.30 GPixel/s higher pixel rate. The number of pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.
anonymous
50
Newer version of OpenVG
Comment
3
vs
1.1
Newer version of OpenVG. OpenVG is used to improve the rendering of 2D graphics on mobile devices, for example the user interface (UI) on a smartphone.

Motorola Moto G is better than Samsung Galaxy S3 because...

Yes
vs
No

Compare with other products

x
Join