Download the official Versus Android app now Android app on Google Play

Samsung Galaxy S3 vs Motorola Moto G

Top 20 Reasons for the

Samsung Galaxy S3

Compared to Motorola Moto G

anonymous
2132
A bit more battery power
Comment
2100 mAh
vs
2070 mAh
1.45% more battery power
anonymous
1632
Faster CPU clock speed
Comment
4 x 1.4 GHz
vs
4 x 1.2 GHz
16.67% faster CPU clock speed
anonymous
1053
A little bigger screen size
Comment
4.8 "
vs
4.5 "
6.67% bigger screen size. The bigger the screen size is, the better the user experience.
anonymous
973
Significantly more megapixels (photo)
Comment
8 MP
vs
5 MP
1.60x more megapixels (photo)
anonymous
775
Has an external memory slot
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The device has a standard memory slot (such as an SD or micro SD card slot) so that you can either extend the internal storage with affordable memory modules or you can retrieve data, such as photographs, easily from a memory card.
anonymous
690
Significantly more megapixel (photo, front camera)
Comment
1.9 MP
vs
1.3 MP
46.15% more megapixel (photo, front camera)
anonymous
515
Has a removable battery
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The battery is removable and can be replaced by the user if broken.
anonymous
386
Marginally lighter
Comment
133 g
vs
143 g
10 g lighter
anonymous
368
A lot thinner
Comment
8.6 mm
vs
11.6 mm
3 mm thinner
anonymous
331
Is DLNA certified
Comment
Yes
vs
No
All DLNA certified products are compatible with one another. When different devices are connected to the same network, data can be transferred easily between them.
anonymous
324
Appreciably better video recording quality
Comment
1080 x 30 fps
vs
720 x 30 fps
1.50x better video recording quality
anonymous
186
Has a BSI sensor
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A BSI (backside illuminated) sensor is a camera image sensor which captures better quality images in poor lighting conditions, and offers better overall sharpness and image quality.
anonymous
144
Has a video light
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A video light helps when recording a movie in low-light situation like a party.
anonymous
132
Has a CMOS sensor
Comment
Yes
vs
No
CMOS image sensors are slowly replacing CCD sensors, due to reduced power consumption and better image quality. They can be very compact and cost relatively little to produce.
anonymous
110
Has manual ISO
Comment
Yes
vs
No
This allows to manually set the ISO level.
anonymous
94
Sizably lower SAR for head (USA)
Comment
0.55 W/kg
vs
1.17 W/kg
0.62 W/kg lower SAR for head (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.
anonymous
75
Considerably lower SAR for head (EU)
Comment
0.21 W/kg
vs
0.79 W/kg
0.58 W/kg lower SAR for head (EU). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 2.0 W/kg in the EU.
Paweł Sapek
5
Supports NFC
Comment
Yes
vs
No
NFC enables wireless payments through your device. You can also connect two NFC enabled devices just by touching them with each other.
anonymous
-136
Less body volume
Comment
82.94 cm³
vs
99.3 cm³
19.73% less body volume
Samsung Exynos 4412
Yes
vs
No
Top 0 Reasons for Samsung Exynos 4412
ARM Mali 400 MP4
Yes
vs
No
Top 1 Reason for ARM Mali 400 MP4
anonymous
99
Measurably faster GPU clock speed
Comment
533 MHz
vs
450 MHz
83 MHz faster GPU clock speed. The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.

Samsung Galaxy S3 is better than Motorola Moto G because...

Yes
vs
No

Top 24 Reasons for the

Motorola Moto G

Compared to Samsung Galaxy S3

anonymous
1350
Modestly higher pixel density
Comment
329 ppi
vs
306 ppi
7.52% higher pixel density
anonymous
614
Every pixel has three subpixels
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The device has a display with three full subpixels per pixel, resulting in a sharp and crisp picture. Pixels in some displays (like AMOLED) share one subpixel to preserve space. This can result in a less crisp, slightly blurred image.
anonymous
324
Has a radio
Comment
Yes
vs
No
It works as an FM radio with included headsets
anonymous
298
Has an IPS screen
Comment
Yes
vs
No
IPS (In-Plane Switching) is a technology used for LCDs. It was designed to overcome the main limitations of normal TFTs TN-matrices: relatively slow response times, small viewing angles and low quality color reproduction.
anonymous
158
Has manual exposure
Comment
Yes
vs
No
This allows to manually set the exposure.
anonymous
139
Explicitly smaller semiconductor size
Comment
28 nm
vs
32 nm
4 nm smaller semiconductor size. A smaller size indicates that the process to create the chip is newer.
anonymous
107
Measurably lower SAR for body (USA)
Comment
1.06 W/kg
vs
1.49 W/kg
0.43 W/kg lower SAR for body (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at hip level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.
Darshil Shah
4
Upto Date Phone
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Android 4.4.4
Dhrumil Bhavsar
3
Waterproof!!!
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Moto G comes with nano coating so you'll feel free to take it out in rain!!!
Dhrumil Bhavsar
3
Slow motion video recording
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Ekim David Nadzan
2
Amazing Value!
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Competes with top tier phones at only 1/4 the price.
anonymous
-66
Lots narrower
Comment
65.9 mm
vs
70.6 mm
4.70 mm narrower
anonymous
-158
A little shorter
Comment
129.9 mm
vs
136.6 mm
6.70 mm shorter
Android 4.4 KitKat (API level 19)
Yes
vs
No
Top 6 Reasons for Android 4.4 KitKat (API level 19)
anonymous
347
Supports 4K resolution
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Allows you to view in ultra-high definition.
anonymous
206
Supports OpenGL ES 3.0, allowing for improved game graphics
Comment
Yes
vs
No
anonymous
109
Is a multi-user system
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Karthik Thangavelu
1
Has Google maps
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Google maps is way better than here maps
Karthik Thangavelu
1
Has a lot of customization options
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Karthik Thangavelu
1
Has Google now which is better than SIRI
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8226 (1.2GHz)
Yes
vs
No
Top 0 Reasons for Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8226 (1.2GHz)
ARM Cortex-A7
Yes
vs
No
Top 2 Reasons for ARM Cortex-A7
anonymous
61
Has dynamic frequency scaling
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Dynamic frequency scaling is a technology that allows the processor to conserve power and reduce noise when it is under a light load.
anonymous
33
Significantly newer version of VFP
Comment
4
vs
3
1 newer version of VFP. Vector Floating-Point (VFP) is used by the processor to deliver increased performance in areas such as digital imaging.
Qualcomm Adreno 305
Yes
vs
No
Top 3 Reasons for Qualcomm Adreno 305
anonymous
62
Reasonably higher floating-point performance
Comment
0.0216 TFLOPS
vs
0.02 TFLOPS
0 TFLOPS higher floating-point performance. Floating-point performance is a measurement of the raw processing power of the GPU.
anonymous
46
Measurably higher pixel rate
Comment
0.8 GPixel/s
vs
0.5 GPixel/s
0.30 GPixel/s higher pixel rate. The number of pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.
anonymous
36
Newer version of OpenVG
Comment
3
vs
1.1
Newer version of OpenVG. OpenVG is used to improve the rendering of 2D graphics on mobile devices, for example the user interface (UI) on a smartphone.

Motorola Moto G is better than Samsung Galaxy S3 because...

Yes
vs
No

Compare with other products

x
Join