Top 25 Reasons for the Samsung Galaxy S3

Top 23 Reasons for the Motorola Moto G

 
 
Which is better? Show result
0
0

Embed this comparison:

Samsung Galaxy S3 vs Motorola Moto G

Top 25 Reasons for the

Samsung Galaxy S3

Compared to Motorola Moto G

3491
Marginally more battery power
Comment
2100 mAh
vs
2070 mAh
1.45% more battery power

×

2823
Faster CPU clock speed
Comment
4 x 1.4 GHz
vs
4 x 1.2 GHz
16.67% faster CPU clock speed

×

1976
Slightly bigger screen size
Comment
4.8 "
vs
4.5 "
6.67% bigger screen size. The bigger the screen size is, the better the user experience.

×

1718
Substantially more megapixels (photo)
Comment
8 MP
vs
5 MP
1.60x more megapixels (photo)

×

1396
Appreciably more megapixel (photo, front camera)
Comment
1.9 MP
vs
1.3 MP
46.15% more megapixel (photo, front camera)

×

1351
Has an external memory slot
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The device has a standard memory slot (such as an SD or micro SD card slot) so that you can either extend the internal storage with affordable memory modules or you can retrieve data, such as photographs, easily from a memory card.

×

976
A tad lighter
Comment
133 g
vs
143 g
10 g lighter

×

953
Has a removable battery
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The battery is removable and can be replaced by the user if broken.

×

827
Plenty thinner
Comment
8.6 mm
vs
11.6 mm
3 mm thinner

×

564
Is DLNA certified
Comment
Yes
vs
No
All DLNA certified products are compatible with one another. When different devices are connected to the same network, data can be transferred easily between them.

×

528
Significantly better video recording quality
Comment
1080 x 30 fps
vs
720 x 30 fps
1.50x better video recording quality

×

457
Has NFC
Comment
Yes
vs
No
NFC (near field communication) allows a device to perform simple wireless transactions.

×

302
Has a BSI sensor
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A BSI (backside illuminated) sensor is a camera image sensor which captures better quality images in poor lighting conditions, and offers better overall sharpness and image quality.

×

261
Has a video light
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A video light helps when recording a movie in low-light situation like a party.

×

212
Has a CMOS sensor
Comment
Yes
vs
No
CMOS image sensors are slowly replacing CCD sensors, due to reduced power consumption and better image quality. They can be very compact and cost relatively little to produce.

×

209
Has manual ISO
Comment
Yes
vs
No
This allows to manually set the ISO level.

×

112
Vastly lower SAR for head (USA)
Comment
0.55 W/kg
vs
1.17 W/kg
0.62 W/kg lower SAR for head (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.

×

94
Notably lower SAR for head (EU)
Comment
0.21 W/kg
vs
0.79 W/kg
0.58 W/kg lower SAR for head (EU). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 2.0 W/kg in the EU.

×

81
Less body volume
Comment
82.94 cm³
vs
99.3 cm³
19.73% less body volume

×

Mayschell Mahammed
9
Smart stay
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The screen switchws off if you are not looking at it

×

Dami Agunbiade
2
Zero Shutter Lag
Comment
Yes
vs
No
This means photos are much more sharper and can be taken in less than 0.5 seconds

×

Adrian Carrillo
1
Notification light
Comment
Yes
vs
No

×

Drini Nosi
1
Has Radio
Comment
Yes
vs
No

×

Jadian JaJa Clarke
1
Body has perfect size–not too big
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The size is much bigger ,which can be suitable or unsuitable.

×

Samsung Exynos 4412
Yes
vs
No
Top 0 Reasons for Samsung Exynos 4412
ARM Mali 400 MP4
Yes
vs
No
Top 1 Reason for ARM Mali 400 MP4
323
Considerably faster GPU clock speed
Comment
533 MHz
vs
450 MHz
83 MHz faster GPU clock speed. The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.

×

Samsung Galaxy S3 is better than Motorola Moto G because...

Yes
vs
No

Please choose the related object

Top 23 Reasons for the

Motorola Moto G

Compared to Samsung Galaxy S3

2384
A tad higher pixel density
Comment
329 ppi
vs
306 ppi
7.52% higher pixel density

×

1033
Every pixel has three subpixels.
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The device has a display with three full subpixels per pixel, resulting in a sharp and crisp picture. Pixels in some displays (like AMOLED) share one subpixel to preserve space. This can result in a less crisp, slightly blurred image.

×

633
Has a radio
Comment
Yes
vs
No
It works as an FM radio with included headsets

×

523
Has an IPS screen
Comment
Yes
vs
No
IPS (In-Plane Switching) is a technology used for LCDs. It was designed to overcome the main limitations of normal TFTs TN-matrices: relatively slow response times, small viewing angles and low quality color reproduction.

×

332
Much narrower
Comment
65.9 mm
vs
70.6 mm
4.70 mm narrower

×

260
Modestly shorter
Comment
129.9 mm
vs
136.6 mm
6.70 mm shorter

×

251
Has manual exposure
Comment
Yes
vs
No
This allows to manually set the exposure.

×

245
Significantly smaller semiconductor size
Comment
28 nm
vs
32 nm
4 nm smaller semiconductor size. A smaller size indicates that the process to create the chip is newer.

×

131
Distinctly lower SAR for body (USA)
Comment
1.06 W/kg
vs
1.49 W/kg
0.43 W/kg lower SAR for body (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at hip level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.

×

Mario Núñez
11
Pure Android experience
Comment
Yes
vs
No
As Google intended it to be.

×

Mauro Gomez
5
Led de notificaciones
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Tiene led de notificaciones, bastabte util, pero limitado al color blanco

×

Harutyun Rehanyan
3
Battery lasts three days!
Comment
Yes
vs
No
One day at 98% battery I turned on the battery saver for the Moto G, and for the next three days (I gamed on it for about 1 hour a day and about 30 minutes of call per day) but of course I turned it off before going to bed and turned it on in mornin

×

Gautham Krishna K
3
Cheap but effecient
Comment
Yes
vs
No
It goes off on a very reasonable price but has incredible specs

×

Oriah Robichaud
1
User removable back
Comment
Yes
vs
No
If the back gets dirty or cracked its very easy to remove and replace

×

Bharath Karthikeyan
1
Bit faster
Comment
Yes
vs
No
First gen moto g is faster than second gen

×

Android 4.4 KitKat (API level 19)
Yes
vs
No
Top 3 Reasons for Android 4.4 KitKat (API level 19)
734
Supports 4K resolution
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Allows you to view in ultra-high definition.

×

385
Is a multi-user system
Comment
Yes
vs
No

×

308
Supports OpenGL ES 3.0, allowing for improved game graphics
Comment
Yes
vs
No

×

Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8226 (1.2GHz)
Yes
vs
No
Top 0 Reasons for Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8226 (1.2GHz)
ARM Cortex-A7
Yes
vs
No
Top 2 Reasons for ARM Cortex-A7
136
Has dynamic frequency scaling
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Dynamic frequency scaling is a technology that allows the processor to conserve power and reduce noise when it is under a light load.

×

48
Sizably newer version of VFP
Comment
4
vs
3
1 newer version of VFP. Vector Floating-Point (VFP) is used by the processor to deliver increased performance in areas such as digital imaging.

×

Qualcomm Adreno 305
Yes
vs
No
Top 3 Reasons for Qualcomm Adreno 305
191
Much higher floating-point performance
Comment
0.0216 TFLOPS
vs
0.02 TFLOPS
0 TFLOPS higher floating-point performance. Floating-point performance is a measurement of the raw processing power of the GPU.

×

120
Measurably higher pixel rate
Comment
0.8 GPixel/s
vs
0.5 GPixel/s
0.30 GPixel/s higher pixel rate. The number of pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.

×

74
Newer version of OpenVG
Comment
3
vs
1.1
Newer version of OpenVG. OpenVG is used to improve the rendering of 2D graphics on mobile devices, for example the user interface (UI) on a smartphone.

×

Motorola Moto G is better than Samsung Galaxy S3 because...

Yes
vs
No

Please choose the related object

x
Join