Top 26 Reasons for the Samsung Galaxy S3

Top 22 Reasons for the Motorola Moto G

 
 
Which is better? Show result
0
0

Samsung Galaxy S3 vs Motorola Moto G

Top 26 Reasons for the

Samsung Galaxy S3

Compared to Motorola Moto G

3622
A little more battery power
Comment
2100mAh
vs
2070mAh
1.45% more battery power

×

2929
Faster CPU clock speed
Comment
4 x 1.4GHz
vs
4 x 1.2GHz
16.67% faster CPU clock speed

×

2049
A bit bigger screen size
Comment
4.8"
vs
4.5"
6.67% bigger screen size. The bigger the screen size is, the better the user experience.

×

1779
Measurably more megapixels (photo)
Comment
8MP
vs
5MP
1.60x more megapixels (photo)

×

1459
Vastly more megapixel (photo, front camera)
Comment
1.9MP
vs
1.3MP
46.15% more megapixel (photo, front camera)

×

1389
Has an external memory slot
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The device has a standard memory slot (such as an SD or micro SD card slot) so that you can either extend the internal storage with affordable memory modules or you can retrieve data, such as photographs, easily from a memory card.

×

1042
A little lighter
Comment
133g
vs
143g
10g lighter

×

986
Has a removable battery
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The battery is removable and can be replaced by the user if broken.

×

885
Reasonably thinner
Comment
8.6mm
vs
11.6mm
3mm thinner

×

587
Is DLNA certified
Comment
Yes
vs
No
All DLNA certified products are compatible with one another. When different devices are connected to the same network, data can be transferred easily between them.

×

549
Vastly better video recording quality
Comment
1080 x 30fps
vs
720 x 30fps
1.50x better video recording quality

×

478
Has NFC
Comment
Yes
vs
No
NFC (near field communication) allows a device to perform simple wireless transactions.

×

314
Has a BSI sensor
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A BSI (backside illuminated) sensor is a camera image sensor which captures better quality images in poor lighting conditions, and offers better overall sharpness and image quality.

×

269
Has a video light
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A video light helps when recording a movie in low-light situation like a party.

×

222
Has a CMOS sensor
Comment
Yes
vs
No
CMOS image sensors are slowly replacing CCD sensors, due to reduced power consumption and better image quality. They can be very compact and cost relatively little to produce.

×

213
Has manual ISO
Comment
Yes
vs
No
This allows to manually set the ISO level.

×

112
Explicitly lower SAR for head (USA)
Comment
0.55W/kg
vs
1.17W/kg
0.62W/kg lower SAR for head (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.

×

99
Less body volume
Comment
82.94cm³
vs
99.3cm³
19.73% less body volume

×

96
Notably lower SAR for head (EU)
Comment
0.21W/kg
vs
0.79W/kg
0.58W/kg lower SAR for head (EU). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 2.0 W/kg in the EU.

×

Mayschell Mahammed
10
Smart stay
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The screen switchws off if you are not looking at it

×

Drini Nosi
3
Has Radio
Comment
Yes
vs
No

×

Dami Agunbiade
3
Zero Shutter Lag
Comment
Yes
vs
No
This means photos are much more sharper and can be taken in less than 0.5 seconds

×

Adrian Carrillo
2
Notification light
Comment
Yes
vs
No

×

Sacha Tremblay
1
Louder speaker
Comment
Yes
vs
No
This speaker is louder and clearer

×

Sacha Tremblay
1
LED light
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Able to see notification without turning on the screen

×

Samsung Exynos 4412
Yes
vs
No
Top 0 Reasons for Samsung Exynos 4412
ARM Mali 400 MP4
Yes
vs
No
Top 1 Reason for ARM Mali 400 MP4
334
Appreciably faster GPU clock speed
Comment
533MHz
vs
450MHz
83MHz faster GPU clock speed. The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.

×

Samsung Galaxy S3 is better than Motorola Moto G because...

Yes
vs
No

Please choose the related object

Top 22 Reasons for the

Motorola Moto G

Compared to Samsung Galaxy S3

2482
A bit higher pixel density
Comment
329ppi
vs
306ppi
7.52% higher pixel density

×

1072
Every pixel has three subpixels.
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The device has a display with three full subpixels per pixel, resulting in a sharp and crisp picture. Pixels in some displays (like AMOLED) share one subpixel to preserve space. This can result in a less crisp, slightly blurred image.

×

659
Has a radio
Comment
Yes
vs
No
It works as an FM radio with included headsets

×

549
Has an IPS screen
Comment
Yes
vs
No
IPS (In-Plane Switching) is a technology used for LCDs. It was designed to overcome the main limitations of normal TFTs TN-matrices: relatively slow response times, small viewing angles and low quality color reproduction.

×

370
Plenty narrower
Comment
65.9mm
vs
70.6mm
4.70mm narrower

×

294
A little shorter
Comment
129.9mm
vs
136.6mm
6.70mm shorter

×

260
Has manual exposure
Comment
Yes
vs
No
This allows to manually set the exposure.

×

256
Significantly smaller semiconductor size
Comment
28nm
vs
32nm
4nm smaller semiconductor size. A smaller size indicates that the process to create the chip is newer.

×

134
Appreciably lower SAR for body (USA)
Comment
1.06W/kg
vs
1.49W/kg
0.43W/kg lower SAR for body (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at hip level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.

×

Mauro Gomez
9
Led de notificaciones
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Tiene led de notificaciones, bastabte util, pero limitado al color blanco

×

Harutyun Rehanyan
3
Battery lasts three days!
Comment
Yes
vs
No
One day at 98% battery I turned on the battery saver for the Moto G, and for the next three days (I gamed on it for about 1 hour a day and about 30 minutes of call per day) but of course I turned it off before going to bed and turned it on in mornin

×

Gautham Krishna K
3
Cheap but effecient
Comment
Yes
vs
No
It goes off on a very reasonable price but has incredible specs

×

Oriah Robichaud
1
User removable back
Comment
Yes
vs
No
If the back gets dirty or cracked its very easy to remove and replace

×

Bharath Karthikeyan
1
Bit faster
Comment
Yes
vs
No
First gen moto g is faster than second gen

×

Android 4.4 KitKat (API level 19)
Yes
vs
No
Top 3 Reasons for Android 4.4 KitKat (API level 19)
761
Supports 4K resolution
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Allows you to view in ultra-high definition.

×

403
Is a multi-user system
Comment
Yes
vs
No

×

316
Supports OpenGL ES 3.0, allowing for improved game graphics
Comment
Yes
vs
No

×

Otto Werse
0
Has turn by turn directions
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Google Navigator is a great turn-by-turn navigation app, standard on all Android phones.

×

Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8226 (1.2GHz)
Yes
vs
No
Top 0 Reasons for Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8226 (1.2GHz)
ARM Cortex-A7
Yes
vs
No
Top 2 Reasons for ARM Cortex-A7
138
Has dynamic frequency scaling
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Dynamic frequency scaling is a technology that allows the processor to conserve power and reduce noise when it is under a light load.

×

48
Measurably newer version of VFP
Comment
4
vs
3
1 newer version of VFP. Vector Floating-Point (VFP) is used by the processor to deliver increased performance in areas such as digital imaging.

×

Qualcomm Adreno 305
Yes
vs
No
Top 3 Reasons for Qualcomm Adreno 305
197
Amply higher floating-point performance
Comment
0.0216TFLOPS
vs
0.02TFLOPS
0TFLOPS higher floating-point performance. Floating-point performance is a measurement of the raw processing power of the GPU.

×

121
Explicitly higher pixel rate
Comment
0.8GPixel/s
vs
0.5GPixel/s
0.30GPixel/s higher pixel rate. The number of pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.

×

78
Newer version of OpenVG
Comment
3
vs
1.1
Newer version of OpenVG. OpenVG is used to improve the rendering of 2D graphics on mobile devices, for example the user interface (UI) on a smartphone.

×

Motorola Moto G is better than Samsung Galaxy S3 because...

Yes
vs
No

Please choose the related object

x
Join