Samsung Galaxy S3 vs Sony Xperia SL

Top 22 Reasons for the

Samsung Galaxy S3

Compared to Sony Xperia SL

anonymous
1091
More battery power
2100 mAh
vs
1750 mAh
20% more battery power
anonymous
848
Significantly faster CPU clock speed
4 x 1.4 GHz
vs
2 x 1.7 GHz
1.65x faster CPU clock speed
anonymous
480
Bigger screen size
4.8 "
vs
4.3 "
11.63% bigger screen size. The bigger the screen size is, the better the user experience.
anonymous
452
Has an external memory slot
Yes
vs
No
The device has a standard memory slot (such as an SD or micro SD card slot) so that you can either extend the internal storage with affordable memory modules or you can retrieve data, such as photographs, easily from a memory card.
anonymous
347
Has branded damage resistant glass
Yes
vs
No
Damage resistant glass (such as Corning Gorilla Glass or Asahi Dragontail Glass) is thin and lightweight, and can withstand high levels of force.
anonymous
295
Notably more megapixel (photo, front camera)
1.9 MP
vs
1.3 MP
46.15% more megapixel (photo, front camera)
anonymous
249
Has a removable battery
Yes
vs
No
The battery is removable and can be replaced by the user if broken.
anonymous
242
Noticeably faster downloads
21 MBits/s
vs
14.4 MBits/s
45.83% faster downloads
anonymous
98
Has continuous autofocus when recording movies
Yes
vs
No
When recording movies they stay focussed and sharp.
anonymous
97
Thinner
8.6 mm
vs
10.6 mm
2 mm thinner
anonymous
87
Slightly lighter
133 g
vs
144 g
11 g lighter
anonymous
84
Significantly smaller semiconductor size
32 nm
vs
45 nm
13 nm smaller semiconductor size. A smaller size indicates that the process to create the chip is newer.
anonymous
75
Newer Bluetooth version
4
vs
3
Newer Bluetooth version
anonymous
56
Has a serial shot mode
Yes
vs
No
You can shoot multiple pictures in a row.
anonymous
56
Distinctly lower SAR for head (USA)
0.55 W/kg
vs
1.31 W/kg
0.76 W/kg lower SAR for head (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.
anonymous
54
Has a built-in HDR mode
Yes
vs
No
It can automatically shoot pictures with a higher dynamic range (HDR).
anonymous
43
Substantially lower SAR for head (EU)
0.21 W/kg
vs
1.3 W/kg
1.09 W/kg lower SAR for head (EU). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 2.0 W/kg in the EU.
anonymous
39
Has touch autofocus
Yes
vs
No
The autofocus is immediately set to the subject by just touching it on the touch screen.
Lily Rose
1
Free Apps on Google Play
Yes
vs
No
Free Apps without having to tamper with your phone.
Vishal Kumar Singh
0
Has a Super AMOLED Plus
Yes
vs
No
This screen has better contrast of colours
Vishal Kumar Singh
0
Better GPU Mali 400mp
Yes
vs
No
S3 has Quad core graphics while Z10 has old Adreno 225 GPU.
Jordan Conkle
0
It's bigger and lighter
Yes
vs
No
Easy to navigate around
Hossam Arafa AbdelRehim
-1
S features
Yes
vs
No
Such as Stay awake, S Voice, Direct call, S Beam, Smart alert, AllShare cast, Pop-up play
Carlos Santiago Tarifa Rey-Stolle
-2
Supports controllers
Yes
vs
No
The system supports usb controllers, so you can play games with real controls instead of the touchscreen
Vishal Kumar Singh
-2
Supports S beam
Yes
vs
No
Can send big sized data files faster through S beam.
Show more reasons
Android 4.1 Jelly Bean (API level 16)
Yes
vs
No
Top 2 Reasons for Android 4.1 Jelly Bean (API level 16)
anonymous
38
You can customize your notifications, e.g. turn off notifications on an app specific basis
Yes
vs
No
Sudeep Ramachandran
1
Beautiful shape attery backup and clear camera viwith good b
Yes
vs
No

Samsung Galaxy S3 is better than Sony Xperia SL because...

Yes
vs
No

Top Twelve Reasons for the

Sony Xperia SL

Compared to Samsung Galaxy S3

anonymous
681
Higher pixel density
342 ppi
vs
306 ppi
11.76% higher pixel density
anonymous
528
Clearly more megapixels (photo)
12.1 MP
vs
8 MP
1.51x more megapixels (photo)
anonymous
328
Every pixel has three subpixels
Yes
vs
No
The device has a display with three full subpixels per pixel, resulting in a sharp and crisp picture. Pixels in some displays (like AMOLED) share one subpixel to preserve space. This can result in a less crisp, slightly blurred image.
anonymous
156
Notably more internal storage
32 GB
vs
16 GB
16 GB more internal storage
anonymous
144
Wider aperture at minimum focal length
2.4
vs
2.6
Wider aperture at minimum focal length. This is the widest aperture available at the minimum focal length. With a wider aperture the sensor can capture more light, helping to avoid blur by enabling a faster shutter speed. It also provides a shallow depth of field, allowing you to blur the background to focus attention on the subject.
anonymous
143
Has a dedicated camera button
Yes
vs
No
A dedicated camera button allows you to take snapshots more easily.
anonymous
132
Has a radio
Yes
vs
No
It works as an FM radio with included headsets
anonymous
89
A little faster uploads
5.8 MBits/s
vs
5.76 MBits/s
0.69% faster uploads
anonymous
66
Has a HDMI output
Yes
vs
No
Devices with a HDMI or mini HDMI port can transfer high definition video and audio to a display.
anonymous
64
Notably lower SAR for body (USA)
0.6 W/kg
vs
1.49 W/kg
0.89 W/kg lower SAR for body (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at hip level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.
anonymous
-350
Substantially narrower
64 mm
vs
70.6 mm
6.60 mm narrower
anonymous
-394
Shorter
128 mm
vs
136.6 mm
8.60 mm shorter

Sony Xperia SL is better than Samsung Galaxy S3 because...

Yes
vs
No

Compare with other products

x
Join