Top 30 Reasons for the Samsung Galaxy S3

Top 13 Reasons for the Sony Xperia SL

 
 
Which is better? Show result
0
0

Embed this comparison:

Samsung Galaxy S3 vs Sony Xperia SL

Top 30 Reasons for the

Samsung Galaxy S3

Compared to Sony Xperia SL

3481
More battery power
Comment
2100 mAh
vs
1750 mAh
20% more battery power

×

2813
Notably faster CPU clock speed
Comment
4 x 1.4 GHz
vs
2 x 1.7 GHz
1.65x faster CPU clock speed

×

1972
Bigger screen size
Comment
4.8 "
vs
4.3 "
11.63% bigger screen size. The bigger the screen size is, the better the user experience.

×

1384
Notably more megapixel (photo, front camera)
Comment
1.9 MP
vs
1.3 MP
46.15% more megapixel (photo, front camera)

×

1345
Has an external memory slot
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The device has a standard memory slot (such as an SD or micro SD card slot) so that you can either extend the internal storage with affordable memory modules or you can retrieve data, such as photographs, easily from a memory card.

×

1059
Has branded damage resistant glass
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Damage resistant glass (such as Corning Gorilla Glass or Asahi Dragontail Glass) is thin and lightweight, and can withstand high levels of force.

×

971
A bit lighter
Comment
133 g
vs
144 g
11 g lighter

×

948
Has a removable battery
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The battery is removable and can be replaced by the user if broken.

×

820
Thinner
Comment
8.6 mm
vs
10.6 mm
2 mm thinner

×

647
Noticeably faster downloads
Comment
21 MBits/s
vs
14.4 MBits/s
45.83% faster downloads

×

282
Has continuous autofocus when recording movies
Comment
Yes
vs
No
When recording movies they stay focussed and sharp.

×

263
Newer Bluetooth version
Comment
4
vs
3
Newer Bluetooth version

×

244
Distinctly smaller semiconductor size
Comment
32 nm
vs
45 nm
13 nm smaller semiconductor size. A smaller size indicates that the process to create the chip is newer.

×

200
Has a serial shot mode
Comment
Yes
vs
No
You can shoot multiple pictures in a row.

×

172
Has a built-in HDR mode
Comment
Yes
vs
No
It can automatically shoot pictures with a higher dynamic range (HDR).

×

112
Clearly lower SAR for head (USA)
Comment
0.55 W/kg
vs
1.31 W/kg
0.76 W/kg lower SAR for head (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.

×

103
Has touch autofocus
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The autofocus is immediately set to the subject by just touching it on the touch screen.

×

94
Explicitly lower SAR for head (EU)
Comment
0.21 W/kg
vs
1.3 W/kg
1.09 W/kg lower SAR for head (EU). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 2.0 W/kg in the EU.

×

78
Marginally less body volume
Comment
82.94 cm³
vs
86.8 cm³
4.65% less body volume

×

Mayschell Mahammed
9
Smart stay
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The screen switchws off if you are not looking at it

×

Dami Agunbiade
2
Zero Shutter Lag
Comment
Yes
vs
No
This means photos are much more sharper and can be taken in less than 0.5 seconds

×

Adrian Carrillo
1
Notification light
Comment
Yes
vs
No

×

Drini Nosi
1
Has Radio
Comment
Yes
vs
No

×

Jadian JaJa Clarke
1
Body has perfect size–not too big
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The size is much bigger ,which can be suitable or unsuitable.

×

Android 4.1 Jelly Bean (API level 16)
Yes
vs
No
Top 2 Reasons for Android 4.1 Jelly Bean (API level 16)
304
Has offline voice recognition
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Offline voice recognition enables you to perform voice actions, like dictating texts or using various voice commands, without an internet connection.

×

90
You can customize your notifications, e.g. turn off notifications on an app specific basis
Comment
Yes
vs
No

×

Samsung Exynos 4412
Yes
vs
No
Top 1 Reason for Samsung Exynos 4412
155
Has integrated graphics
Comment
Yes
vs
No
With integrated graphics you don’t need to buy a separate graphics card.

×

ARM Cortex-A9
Yes
vs
No
Top 3 Reasons for ARM Cortex-A9
106
Has NX bit
Comment
Yes
vs
No
NX bit helps protect the computer from malicious attacks.

×

104
Has TrustZone
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).

×

102
Has out-of-order execution
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Out-of-order execution is used in CPUs to make use of instruction cycles that would normally be wasted due to delays.

×

Samsung Galaxy S3 is better than Sony Xperia SL because...

Yes
vs
No

Please choose the related object

Top 13 Reasons for the

Sony Xperia SL

Compared to Samsung Galaxy S3

2378
Higher pixel density
Comment
342 ppi
vs
306 ppi
11.76% higher pixel density

×

1712
Noticeably more megapixels (photo)
Comment
12.1 MP
vs
8 MP
1.51x more megapixels (photo)

×

1031
Every pixel has three subpixels.
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The device has a display with three full subpixels per pixel, resulting in a sharp and crisp picture. Pixels in some displays (like AMOLED) share one subpixel to preserve space. This can result in a less crisp, slightly blurred image.

×

694
Substantially more internal storage
Comment
32 GB
vs
16 GB
16 GB more internal storage

×

631
Has a radio
Comment
Yes
vs
No
It works as an FM radio with included headsets

×

551
Has a dedicated camera button
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A dedicated camera button allows you to take snapshots more easily.

×

397
Wider aperture at minimum focal length
Comment
2.4
vs
2.6
Wider aperture at minimum focal length. With a wider aperture the sensor can capture more light, helping to avoid blur by enabling a faster shutter speed. It also provides a shallow depth of field, allowing you to blur the background to focus attention on the subject.

×

331
Measurably narrower
Comment
64 mm
vs
70.6 mm
6.60 mm narrower

×

256
Shorter
Comment
128 mm
vs
136.6 mm
8.60 mm shorter

×

208
Slightly faster uploads
Comment
5.8 MBits/s
vs
5.76 MBits/s
0.69% faster uploads

×

129
Distinctly lower SAR for body (USA)
Comment
0.6 W/kg
vs
1.49 W/kg
0.89 W/kg lower SAR for body (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at hip level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.

×

112
Has a HDMI output
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Devices with a HDMI or mini HDMI port can transfer high definition video and audio to a display.

×

105
Plays Adobe Flash
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Adobe Flash with video and sound is supported in the device's browser.

×

Sony Xperia SL is better than Samsung Galaxy S3 because...

Yes
vs
No

Please choose the related object

x
Join