Which is better? Show result
Samsung Galaxy S3 vs Sony Xperia SL
Top 28 Reasons for the
Samsung Galaxy S3
Compared to Sony Xperia SL
More battery power
20% more battery power
Appreciably faster CPU clock speed
4 x 1.4 GHz
2 x 1.7 GHz
1.65x faster CPU clock speed
Bigger screen size
11.63% bigger screen size. The bigger the screen size is, the better the user experience.
Noticeably more megapixel (photo, front camera)
46.15% more megapixel (photo, front camera)
Has an external memory slot
The device has a standard memory slot (such as an SD or micro SD card slot) so that you can either extend the internal storage with affordable memory modules or you can retrieve data, such as photographs, easily from a memory card.
Has branded damage resistant glass
Damage resistant glass (such as Corning Gorilla Glass or Asahi Dragontail Glass) is thin and lightweight, and can withstand high levels of force.
Has a removable battery
The battery is removable and can be replaced by the user if broken.
11 g lighter
2 mm thinner
Noticeably faster downloads
45.83% faster downloads
Has continuous autofocus when recording movies
When recording movies they stay focussed and sharp.
Newer Bluetooth version
Newer Bluetooth version
Appreciably smaller semiconductor size
13 nm smaller semiconductor size. A smaller size indicates that the process to create the chip is newer.
Has a serial shot mode
You can shoot multiple pictures in a row.
Has a built-in HDR mode
It can automatically shoot pictures with a higher dynamic range (HDR).
Clearly lower SAR for head (USA)
0.76 W/kg lower SAR for head (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.
Has touch autofocus
The autofocus is immediately set to the subject by just touching it on the touch screen.
Noticeably lower SAR for head (EU)
1.09 W/kg lower SAR for head (EU). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 2.0 W/kg in the EU.
A tad less body volume
4.65% less body volume
Zero Shutter Lag
This means photos are much more sharper and can be taken in less than 0.5 seconds
Body has perfect size–not too big
The size is much bigger ,which can be suitable or unsuitable.
Samsung Galaxy S3 is better than Sony Xperia SL because...
Top 13 Reasons for the
Sony Xperia SL
Compared to Samsung Galaxy S3
Higher pixel density
11.76% higher pixel density
Substantially more megapixels (photo)
1.51x more megapixels (photo)
Every pixel has three subpixels.
The device has a display with three full subpixels per pixel, resulting in a sharp and crisp picture. Pixels in some displays (like AMOLED) share one subpixel to preserve space. This can result in a less crisp, slightly blurred image.
Substantially more internal storage
16 GB more internal storage
Has a radio
It works as an FM radio with included headsets
Wider aperture at minimum focal length
Wider aperture at minimum focal length. With a wider aperture the sensor can capture more light, helping to avoid blur by enabling a faster shutter speed. It also provides a shallow depth of field, allowing you to blur the background to focus attention on the subject.
6.60 mm narrower
A bit faster uploads
0.69% faster uploads
8.60 mm shorter
Explicitly lower SAR for body (USA)
0.89 W/kg lower SAR for body (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at hip level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.
Has a HDMI output
Devices with a HDMI or mini HDMI port can transfer high definition video and audio to a display.
Plays Adobe Flash
Adobe Flash with video and sound is supported in the device's browser.