Samsung Galaxy S3 vs Sony Xperia T

Top 18 Reasons for the

Samsung Galaxy S3

Compared to Sony Xperia T

anonymous
2963
More battery power
Comment
2100 mAh
vs
1850 mAh
13.51% more battery power
anonymous
1626
Marginally bigger screen size
Comment
4.8 "
vs
4.55 "
5.49% bigger screen size. The bigger the screen size is, the better the user experience.
anonymous
1137
Significantly more megapixel (photo, front camera)
Comment
1.9 MP
vs
1.3 MP
46.15% more megapixel (photo, front camera)
anonymous
913
Has branded damage resistant glass
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Damage resistant glass (such as Corning Gorilla Glass or Asahi Dragontail Glass) is thin and lightweight, and can withstand high levels of force.
anonymous
811
Has a removable battery
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The battery is removable and can be replaced by the user if broken.
anonymous
754
Modestly lighter
Comment
133 g
vs
139 g
6 g lighter
anonymous
652
Marginally thinner
Comment
8.6 mm
vs
9.4 mm
0.80 mm thinner
anonymous
170
Has a serial shot mode
Comment
Yes
vs
No
You can shoot multiple pictures in a row.
anonymous
149
Has a built-in HDR mode
Comment
Yes
vs
No
It can automatically shoot pictures with a higher dynamic range (HDR).
anonymous
108
Significantly lower SAR for head (USA)
Comment
0.55 W/kg
vs
1.07 W/kg
0.52 W/kg lower SAR for head (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.
anonymous
88
Noticeably lower SAR for head (EU)
Comment
0.21 W/kg
vs
0.85 W/kg
0.64 W/kg lower SAR for head (EU). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 2.0 W/kg in the EU.
anonymous
29
Slightly less body volume
Comment
82.94 cm³
vs
91.01 cm³
9.73% less body volume
Dami Agunbiade
2
Zero Shutter Lag
Comment
Yes
vs
No
This means photos are much more sharper and can be taken in less than 0.5 seconds
Jadian JaJa Clarke
1
Body has perfect size–not too big
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The size is much bigger ,which can be suitable or unsuitable.
Samsung Exynos 4412
Yes
vs
No
Top 1 Reason for Samsung Exynos 4412
anonymous
128
Has integrated graphics
Comment
Yes
vs
No
With integrated graphics you don’t need to buy a separate graphics card.
ARM Cortex-A9
Yes
vs
No
Top 3 Reasons for ARM Cortex-A9
anonymous
84
Has NX bit
Comment
Yes
vs
No
NX bit helps protect the computer from malicious attacks.
anonymous
79
Has TrustZone
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).
anonymous
78
Has out-of-order execution
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Out-of-order execution is used in CPUs to make use of instruction cycles that would normally be wasted due to delays.

Samsung Galaxy S3 is better than Sony Xperia T because...

Yes
vs
No

Top 17 Reasons for the

Sony Xperia T

Compared to Samsung Galaxy S3

anonymous
2018
A bit higher pixel density
Comment
323 ppi
vs
306 ppi
5.56% higher pixel density
anonymous
1471
Vastly more megapixels (photo)
Comment
13 MP
vs
8 MP
1.63x more megapixels (photo)
anonymous
862
Every pixel has three subpixels.
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The device has a display with three full subpixels per pixel, resulting in a sharp and crisp picture. Pixels in some displays (like AMOLED) share one subpixel to preserve space. This can result in a less crisp, slightly blurred image.
anonymous
744
Has stereo speakers
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Devices with stereo speakers deliver sound that surrounds the user from left and right side, creating a richer sound and a better experience.
anonymous
576
Measurably faster downloads
Comment
42.2 MBits/s
vs
21 MBits/s
2.01x faster downloads
anonymous
509
Has a radio
Comment
Yes
vs
No
It works as an FM radio with included headsets
anonymous
472
Has a dedicated camera button
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A dedicated camera button allows you to take snapshots more easily.
anonymous
347
Wider aperture at minimum focal length
Comment
2.4
vs
2.6
Wider aperture at minimum focal length. With a wider aperture the sensor can capture more light, helping to avoid blur by enabling a faster shutter speed. It also provides a shallow depth of field, allowing you to blur the background to focus attention on the subject.
anonymous
204
Sizably smaller semiconductor size
Comment
28 nm
vs
32 nm
4 nm smaller semiconductor size. A smaller size indicates that the process to create the chip is newer.
anonymous
194
Narrower
Comment
67.3 mm
vs
70.6 mm
3.30 mm narrower
anonymous
184
Higher GeekBench result
Comment
511
vs
428
Higher GeekBench result. This is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the performance of the CPU. (Source: Primate Labs, 2015)
anonymous
137
Shorter
Comment
129.4 mm
vs
136.6 mm
7.20 mm shorter
anonymous
120
Noticeably lower SAR for body (USA)
Comment
0.88 W/kg
vs
1.49 W/kg
0.61 W/kg lower SAR for body (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at hip level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.
anonymous
93
Plays Adobe Flash
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Adobe Flash with video and sound is supported in the device's browser.
Rahiq Mahbub
34
PlayStation Mobile Certified
Comment
Yes
vs
No
This Xperia can play apps & games from PlayStation Mobile platform. US/EU PSN ID is required to use this feature.
Samuel Harper
11
NFC
Comment
Yes
vs
No
NFC for fastest sharing
Samuel Harper
8
Small Apps
Comment
Yes
vs
No
It can run floating small apps on the top of the app you are using.

Sony Xperia T is better than Samsung Galaxy S3 because...

Yes
vs
No

Compare with other products

x
Join