Top 30 Reasons for the Samsung Galaxy S3

Top 15 Reasons for the Sony Xperia V

 
 
Which is better? Show result
0
0

Embed this comparison:

Samsung Galaxy S3 vs Sony Xperia V

Top 30 Reasons for the

Samsung Galaxy S3

Compared to Sony Xperia V

3558
More battery power
Comment
2100 mAh
vs
1750 mAh
20% more battery power

×

2874
Vastly faster CPU clock speed
Comment
4 x 1.4 GHz
vs
2 x 1.5 GHz
1.87x faster CPU clock speed

×

2015
Bigger screen size
Comment
4.8 "
vs
4.3 "
11.63% bigger screen size. The bigger the screen size is, the better the user experience.

×

1425
Explicitly more megapixel (photo, front camera)
Comment
1.9 MP
vs
0.3 MP
6.33x more megapixel (photo, front camera)

×

1082
Has branded damage resistant glass
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Damage resistant glass (such as Corning Gorilla Glass or Asahi Dragontail Glass) is thin and lightweight, and can withstand high levels of force.

×

856
Thinner
Comment
8.6 mm
vs
10.7 mm
2.10 mm thinner

×

713
Notably more internal storage
Comment
16 GB
vs
8 GB
8 GB more internal storage

×

291
Has continuous autofocus when recording movies
Comment
Yes
vs
No
When recording movies they stay focussed and sharp.

×

284
Significantly more microphone(s)
Comment
2
vs
1
1 more microphone(s). More microphones result in better sound quality and enable the device to filter out background noise.

×

211
Has manual ISO
Comment
Yes
vs
No
This allows to manually set the ISO level.

×

209
Has a serial shot mode
Comment
Yes
vs
No
You can shoot multiple pictures in a row.

×

175
Has a built-in HDR mode
Comment
Yes
vs
No
It can automatically shoot pictures with a higher dynamic range (HDR).

×

119
Has manual white balance
Comment
Yes
vs
No
With manual white balance you can choose the most accurate setting and avoid the green, blue or red hue which can occur in auto mode. You can also change the setting for artistic effect.

×

112
Vastly lower SAR for head (USA)
Comment
0.55 W/kg
vs
0.86 W/kg
0.31 W/kg lower SAR for head (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.

×

105
Has touch autofocus
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The autofocus is immediately set to the subject by just touching it on the touch screen.

×

94
Distinctly lower SAR for head (EU)
Comment
0.21 W/kg
vs
0.86 W/kg
0.65 W/kg lower SAR for head (EU). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 2.0 W/kg in the EU.

×

89
A little less body volume
Comment
82.94 cm³
vs
89.72 cm³
8.17% less body volume

×

Mayschell Mahammed
10
Smart stay
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The screen switchws off if you are not looking at it

×

Drini Nosi
3
Has Radio
Comment
Yes
vs
No

×

Dami Agunbiade
3
Zero Shutter Lag
Comment
Yes
vs
No
This means photos are much more sharper and can be taken in less than 0.5 seconds

×

Adrian Carrillo
2
Notification light
Comment
Yes
vs
No

×

Jadian JaJa Clarke
2
Body has perfect size–not too big
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The size is much bigger ,which can be suitable or unsuitable.

×

Sacha Tremblay
1
Louder speaker
Comment
Yes
vs
No
This speaker is louder and clearer

×

Sacha Tremblay
1
LED light
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Able to see notification without turning on the screen

×

Android 4.1 Jelly Bean (API level 16)
Yes
vs
No
Top 2 Reasons for Android 4.1 Jelly Bean (API level 16)
313
Has offline voice recognition
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Offline voice recognition enables you to perform voice actions, like dictating texts or using various voice commands, without an internet connection.

×

93
You can customize your notifications, e.g. turn off notifications on an app specific basis
Comment
Yes
vs
No

×

Samsung Exynos 4412
Yes
vs
No
Top 1 Reason for Samsung Exynos 4412
159
Has integrated graphics
Comment
Yes
vs
No
With integrated graphics you don’t need to buy a separate graphics card.

×

ARM Cortex-A9
Yes
vs
No
Top 3 Reasons for ARM Cortex-A9
107
Has NX bit
Comment
Yes
vs
No
NX bit helps protect the computer from malicious attacks.

×

105
Has TrustZone
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).

×

104
Has out-of-order execution
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Out-of-order execution is used in CPUs to make use of instruction cycles that would normally be wasted due to delays.

×

Samsung Galaxy S3 is better than Sony Xperia V because...

Yes
vs
No

Please choose the related object

Top 15 Reasons for the

Sony Xperia V

Compared to Samsung Galaxy S3

2434
Higher pixel density
Comment
341 ppi
vs
306 ppi
11.44% higher pixel density

×

1755
Significantly more megapixels (photo)
Comment
13 MP
vs
8 MP
1.63x more megapixels (photo)

×

1053
Every pixel has three subpixels.
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The device has a display with three full subpixels per pixel, resulting in a sharp and crisp picture. Pixels in some displays (like AMOLED) share one subpixel to preserve space. This can result in a less crisp, slightly blurred image.

×

1010
Marginally lighter
Comment
120 g
vs
133 g
13 g lighter

×

825
Is dustproof and water resistant
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Dustproof / water resistant at depth equal to or greater than 1m.

×

656
Measurably faster downloads
Comment
42 MBits/s
vs
21 MBits/s
2x faster downloads

×

648
Has a radio
Comment
Yes
vs
No
It works as an FM radio with included headsets

×

347
Plenty narrower
Comment
65 mm
vs
70.6 mm
5.60 mm narrower

×

343
Weather sealed
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Device is protected with extra seals to prevent failures due to any kind of weather.

×

277
Shorter
Comment
129 mm
vs
136.6 mm
7.60 mm shorter

×

249
Measurably smaller semiconductor size
Comment
28 nm
vs
32 nm
4 nm smaller semiconductor size. A smaller size indicates that the process to create the chip is newer.

×

214
A little bit faster uploads
Comment
5.8 MBits/s
vs
5.76 MBits/s
0.69% faster uploads

×

133
Sizably lower SAR for body (USA)
Comment
0.73 W/kg
vs
1.49 W/kg
0.76 W/kg lower SAR for body (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at hip level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.

×

108
Plays Adobe Flash
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Adobe Flash with video and sound is supported in the device's browser.

×

Muhab Ashraf
2
Supports 4g
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The HTC desire 600 doesn't support 4g

×

Sony Xperia V is better than Samsung Galaxy S3 because...

Yes
vs
No

Please choose the related object

x
Join