Top 46 Reasons for the Samsung Galaxy S4 16GB

Top Ten Reasons for the Samsung Galaxy S3 32GB

 
 
Which is better? Show result
0
0

Embed this comparison:

Samsung Galaxy S4 16GB vs Samsung Galaxy S3 32GB

Top 46 Reasons for the

Samsung Galaxy S4 16GB

Compared to Samsung Galaxy S3 32GB

3491
More battery power
Comment
2600 mAh
vs
2100 mAh
23.81% more battery power

×

2823
Amply faster CPU clock speed
Comment
4 x 1.9 GHz
vs
4 x 1.4 GHz
35.71% faster CPU clock speed

×

2384
Considerably higher pixel density
Comment
441 ppi
vs
306 ppi
44.12% higher pixel density

×

1976
Modestly bigger screen size
Comment
5 "
vs
4.8 "
4.17% bigger screen size. The bigger the screen size is, the better the user experience.

×

1718
Clearly more megapixels (photo)
Comment
13 MP
vs
8 MP
1.63x more megapixels (photo)

×

1660
Reasonably more RAM memory
Comment
2 GB
vs
1 GB
1 GB more RAM memory

×

1618
Noticeably higher resolution
Comment
1920x1080 px
vs
1280x720 px
2.25x higher resolution

×

1397
Plenty more megapixel (photo, front camera)
Comment
2 MP
vs
1.9 MP
5.26% more megapixel (photo, front camera)

×

976
Marginally lighter
Comment
130 g
vs
133 g
3 g lighter

×

827
A tad thinner
Comment
7.9 mm
vs
8.6 mm
0.70 mm thinner

×

649
Sizably faster downloads
Comment
100 MBits/s
vs
21 MBits/s
4.76x faster downloads

×

641
Wireless charging
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The manufacturer offers a branded wireless charging kit. To charge the device, you simply put it down on its charging base.

×

434
Has fast 802.11ac WiFi connection
Comment
Yes
vs
No
802.11ac wireless works on the 5GHz frequency range. It offers higher transfer rates, improved reliability and improved power consumption. It provides advantages for gaming and HD video streaming.

×

401
Wider aperture at minimum focal length
Comment
2.2
vs
2.6
Wider aperture at minimum focal length. With a wider aperture the sensor can capture more light, helping to avoid blur by enabling a faster shutter speed. It also provides a shallow depth of field, allowing you to blur the background to focus attention on the subject.

×

332
A bit narrower
Comment
69.8 mm
vs
70.6 mm
0.80 mm narrower

×

252
Supports ANT+
Comment
Yes
vs
No
ANT+ is a wireless protocol similar to Bluetooth Smart, and is very power efficient. It is mainly used for fitness monitoring devices such as heart rate monitors and cadence sensors to connect to other devices, eg. sports watches, smartphones and cycling computers.

×

251
Has manual exposure
Comment
Yes
vs
No
This allows to manually set the exposure.

×

245
Measurably smaller semiconductor size
Comment
28 nm
vs
32 nm
4 nm smaller semiconductor size. A smaller size indicates that the process to create the chip is newer.

×

208
Sizably faster uploads
Comment
50 MBits/s
vs
5.76 MBits/s
8.68x faster uploads

×

202
Higher GeekBench result
Comment
752
vs
428
Higher GeekBench result. This is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the performance of the CPU. (Source: Primate Labs, 2015)

×

81
A little bit less body volume
Comment
75.32 cm³
vs
82.94 cm³
10.12% less body volume

×

Dom In
9
Has a AMOLED Display
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Deeper blacks and Brighter Whites, The display literaly disappears, you wont be able to distinguish the screen from the bezel

×

Mohammed Irfan
8
It has lollipop update
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Better UI and smoother,faster.

×

Mohammed Irfan
7
Lollipop update
Comment
Yes
vs
No
It turns into like s5

×

Aadarsh Ps
7
Better graphics
Comment
Yes
vs
No

×

Filsuf Navas
6
Has functional NFC
Comment
Yes
vs
No

×

Show more reasons
Android 4.4 KitKat (API level 19)
Yes
vs
No
Top 3 Reasons for Android 4.4 KitKat (API level 19)
735
Supports 4K resolution
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Allows you to view in ultra-high definition.

×

385
Is a multi-user system
Comment
Yes
vs
No

×

308
Supports OpenGL ES 3.0, allowing for improved game graphics
Comment
Yes
vs
No

×

Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 APQ8064AB
Yes
vs
No
Top 3 Reasons for Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 APQ8064AB
310
Has integrated LTE
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The system on a chip (SoC) has an integrated LTE cellular chip. LTE is capable of downloading at faster speeds than older, 3G technology.

×

230
Clearly higher ram speed
Comment
600 MHz
vs
400 MHz
200 MHz higher ram speed. It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.

×

136
Has dynamic frequency scaling
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Dynamic frequency scaling is a technology that allows the processor to conserve power and reduce noise when it is under a light load.

×

Qualcomm Krait 300
Yes
vs
No
Top 4 Reasons for Qualcomm Krait 300
102
Supports hardware-assisted virtualization
Comment
Yes
vs
No
It is easier to obtain better performance when using virtualization if it is hardware-assisted.

×

96
Clearly wider front-end
Comment
3
vs
2
1 wider front-end. The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better

×

65
Measurably more bits executed at a time
Comment
128
vs
64
64 more bits executed at a time. NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.

×

48
Vastly newer version of VFP
Comment
4
vs
3
1 newer version of VFP. Vector Floating-Point (VFP) is used by the processor to deliver increased performance in areas such as digital imaging.

×

Qualcomm Adreno 320 (450MHz)
Yes
vs
No
Top 4 Reasons for Qualcomm Adreno 320 (450MHz)
191
Sizably higher floating-point performance
Comment
0.057 TFLOPS
vs
0.02 TFLOPS
0.04 TFLOPS higher floating-point performance. Floating-point performance is a measurement of the raw processing power of the GPU.

×

120
Sizably higher pixel rate
Comment
3.2 GPixel/s
vs
0.5 GPixel/s
2.70 GPixel/s higher pixel rate. The number of pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.

×

82
Newer version of OpenGL ES
Comment
3
vs
2
Newer version of OpenGL ES. OpenGL ES is used for games on mobile devices such as smartphones. Newer versions support better graphics.

×

74
Newer version of OpenVG
Comment
3
vs
1.1
Newer version of OpenVG. OpenVG is used to improve the rendering of 2D graphics on mobile devices, for example the user interface (UI) on a smartphone.

×

Samsung Galaxy S4 16GB is better than Samsung Galaxy S3 32GB because...

Yes
vs
No

Please choose the related object

Top Ten Reasons for the

Samsung Galaxy S3 32GB

Compared to Samsung Galaxy S4 16GB

695
Clearly more internal storage
Comment
32 GB
vs
16 GB
16 GB more internal storage

×

225
Noticeably bigger pixel size
Comment
2 µm²
vs
1.3 µm²
0.70 µm² bigger pixel size. Pixel size is the surface area of each pixel on the camera sensor. Larger pixels can absorb more light. This can result in better image quality and improved low-light performance.

×

131
Lower SAR for body (USA)
Comment
1.49 W/kg
vs
1.55 W/kg
0.06 W/kg lower SAR for body (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at hip level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.

×

112
Appreciably lower SAR for head (USA)
Comment
0.55 W/kg
vs
0.85 W/kg
0.30 W/kg lower SAR for head (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.

×

Mayschell Mahammed
9
Smart stay
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The screen switchws off if you are not looking at it

×

Dami Agunbiade
2
Zero Shutter Lag
Comment
Yes
vs
No
This means photos are much more sharper and can be taken in less than 0.5 seconds

×

Adrian Carrillo
1
Notification light
Comment
Yes
vs
No

×

Drini Nosi
1
Has Radio
Comment
Yes
vs
No

×

Jadian JaJa Clarke
1
Body has perfect size–not too big
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The size is much bigger ,which can be suitable or unsuitable.

×

Samsung Exynos 4412
Yes
vs
No
Top 0 Reasons for Samsung Exynos 4412
ARM Mali 400 MP4
Yes
vs
No
Top 1 Reason for ARM Mali 400 MP4
323
Appreciably faster GPU clock speed
Comment
533 MHz
vs
450 MHz
83 MHz faster GPU clock speed. The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.

×

Samsung Galaxy S3 32GB is better than Samsung Galaxy S4 16GB because...

Yes
vs
No

Please choose the related object

x
Join