Which is better? Show result
Samsung Galaxy S4 16GB vs Samsung Galaxy S3 32GB
Top 47 Reasons for the
Samsung Galaxy S4 16GB
Compared to Samsung Galaxy S3 32GB
More battery power
23.81% more battery power
Reasonably faster CPU clock speed
4 x 1.9 GHz
4 x 1.4 GHz
35.71% faster CPU clock speed
Measurably higher pixel density
44.12% higher pixel density
Somewhat bigger screen size
4.17% bigger screen size. The bigger the screen size is, the better the user experience.
Amply more RAM memory
1 GB more RAM memory
Sizably more megapixels (photo)
1.63x more megapixels (photo)
Measurably higher resolution
2.25x higher resolution
Plenty more megapixel (photo, front camera)
5.26% more megapixel (photo, front camera)
A little bit lighter
3 g lighter
A bit thinner
0.70 mm thinner
Vastly faster downloads
4.76x faster downloads
The manufacturer offers a branded wireless charging kit. To charge the device, you simply put it down on its charging base.
Has fast 802.11ac WiFi connection
802.11ac wireless works on the 5GHz frequency range. It offers higher transfer rates, improved reliability and improved power consumption. It provides advantages for gaming and HD video streaming.
Wider aperture at minimum focal length
Wider aperture at minimum focal length. With a wider aperture the sensor can capture more light, helping to avoid blur by enabling a faster shutter speed. It also provides a shallow depth of field, allowing you to blur the background to focus attention on the subject.
Has manual exposure
This allows to manually set the exposure.
ANT+ is a wireless protocol similar to Bluetooth Smart, and is very power efficient. It is mainly used for fitness monitoring devices such as heart rate monitors and cadence sensors to connect to other devices, eg. sports watches, smartphones and cycling computers.
Considerably smaller semiconductor size
4 nm smaller semiconductor size. A smaller size indicates that the process to create the chip is newer.
0.80 mm narrower
Considerably faster uploads
8.68x faster uploads
Higher GeekBench result
Higher GeekBench result. This is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the performance of the CPU. (Source: Primate Labs, 2015)
Marginally less body volume
10.12% less body volume
Have a ir blaster
Has a AMOLED Display
Deeper blacks and Brighter Whites, The display literaly disappears, you wont be able to distinguish the screen from the bezel
Slow motion video function is available in S4 also
Has functional NFC
Show more reasons
Samsung Galaxy S4 16GB is better than Samsung Galaxy S3 32GB because...
Top Seven Reasons for the
Samsung Galaxy S3 32GB
Compared to Samsung Galaxy S4 16GB
Substantially more internal storage
16 GB more internal storage
Significantly bigger pixel size
0.70 µm² bigger pixel size. Pixel size is the surface area of each pixel on the camera sensor. Larger pixels can absorb more light. This can result in better image quality and improved low-light performance.
Lower SAR for body (USA)
0.06 W/kg lower SAR for body (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at hip level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.
Vastly lower SAR for head (USA)
0.30 W/kg lower SAR for head (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.
Zero Shutter Lag
This means photos are much more sharper and can be taken in less than 0.5 seconds
Body has perfect size–not too big
The size is much bigger ,which can be suitable or unsuitable.