Which is better? Show result
Samsung Galaxy S4 64GB vs Samsung Galaxy S3 64GB
Top 49 Reasons for the
Samsung Galaxy S4 64GB
Compared to Samsung Galaxy S3 64GB
More battery power
23.81% more battery power
A lot faster CPU clock speed
4 x 1.9 GHz
4 x 1.4 GHz
35.71% faster CPU clock speed
Explicitly higher pixel density
44.12% higher pixel density
A little bit bigger screen size
4.17% bigger screen size. The bigger the screen size is, the better the user experience.
Lots more RAM memory
1 GB more RAM memory
Clearly more megapixels (photo)
1.63x more megapixels (photo)
Explicitly higher resolution
2.25x higher resolution
Way more megapixel (photo, front camera)
5.26% more megapixel (photo, front camera)
3 g lighter
0.70 mm thinner
Notably faster downloads
4.76x faster downloads
The manufacturer offers a branded wireless charging kit. To charge the device, you simply put it down on its charging base.
Has fast 802.11ac WiFi connection
802.11ac wireless works on the 5GHz frequency range. It offers higher transfer rates, improved reliability and improved power consumption. It provides advantages for gaming and HD video streaming.
Wider aperture at minimum focal length
Wider aperture at minimum focal length. With a wider aperture the sensor can capture more light, helping to avoid blur by enabling a faster shutter speed. It also provides a shallow depth of field, allowing you to blur the background to focus attention on the subject.
A bit narrower
0.80 mm narrower
ANT+ is a wireless protocol similar to Bluetooth Smart, and is very power efficient. It is mainly used for fitness monitoring devices such as heart rate monitors and cadence sensors to connect to other devices, eg. sports watches, smartphones and cycling computers.
Has manual exposure
This allows to manually set the exposure.
Considerably smaller semiconductor size
4 nm smaller semiconductor size. A smaller size indicates that the process to create the chip is newer.
Noticeably faster uploads
8.68x faster uploads
Higher GeekBench result
Higher GeekBench result. This is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the performance of the CPU. (Source: Primate Labs, 2015)
Modestly less body volume
10.12% less body volume
Has a AMOLED Display
Deeper blacks and Brighter Whites, The display literaly disappears, you wont be able to distinguish the screen from the bezel
Slow motion video function is available in S4 also
Has functional NFC
Has soft feather touch button for settings
Show more reasons
Samsung Galaxy S4 64GB is better than Samsung Galaxy S3 64GB because...
Top Seven Reasons for the
Samsung Galaxy S3 64GB
Compared to Samsung Galaxy S4 64GB
Substantially bigger pixel size
0.70 µm² bigger pixel size. Pixel size is the surface area of each pixel on the camera sensor. Larger pixels can absorb more light. This can result in better image quality and improved low-light performance.
Lower SAR for body (USA)
0.06 W/kg lower SAR for body (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at hip level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.
Noticeably lower SAR for head (USA)
0.30 W/kg lower SAR for head (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.
Zero Shutter Lag
This means photos are much more sharper and can be taken in less than 0.5 seconds
Body has perfect size–not too big
The size is much bigger ,which can be suitable or unsuitable.