Samsung Galaxy S4 vs Samsung Galaxy S3

Top 45 Reasons for the

Samsung Galaxy S4

Compared to Samsung Galaxy S3

anonymous
2729
More battery power
Comment
2600 mAh
vs
2100 mAh
23.81% more battery power
anonymous
2179
Amply faster CPU clock speed
Comment
4 x 1.9 GHz
vs
4 x 1.4 GHz
35.71% faster CPU clock speed
anonymous
1837
Sizably higher pixel density
Comment
441 ppi
vs
306 ppi
44.12% higher pixel density
anonymous
1456
A bit bigger screen size
Comment
5 "
vs
4.8 "
4.17% bigger screen size. The bigger the screen size is, the better the user experience.
anonymous
1396
Way more RAM memory
Comment
2 GB
vs
1 GB
1 GB more RAM memory
anonymous
1324
Considerably more megapixels (photo)
Comment
13 MP
vs
8 MP
1.63x more megapixels (photo)
anonymous
1283
Clearly higher resolution
Comment
1920x1080 px
vs
1280x720 px
2.25x higher resolution
anonymous
1028
A lot more megapixel (photo, front camera)
Comment
2 MP
vs
1.9 MP
5.26% more megapixel (photo, front camera)
anonymous
658
A bit lighter
Comment
130 g
vs
133 g
3 g lighter
anonymous
562
A shade thinner
Comment
7.9 mm
vs
8.6 mm
0.70 mm thinner
anonymous
542
Sizably faster downloads
Comment
100 MBits/s
vs
21 MBits/s
4.76x faster downloads
anonymous
500
Clearly more internal storage
Comment
64 GB
vs
16 GB
48 GB more internal storage
anonymous
492
Wireless charging
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The manufacturer offers a branded wireless charging kit. To charge the device, you simply put it down on its charging base.
anonymous
375
Has fast 802.11ac WiFi connection
Comment
Yes
vs
No
802.11ac wireless works on the 5GHz frequency range. It offers higher transfer rates, improved reliability and improved power consumption. It provides advantages for gaming and HD video streaming.
anonymous
321
Wider aperture at minimum focal length
Comment
2.2
vs
2.6
Wider aperture at minimum focal length. With a wider aperture the sensor can capture more light, helping to avoid blur by enabling a faster shutter speed. It also provides a shallow depth of field, allowing you to blur the background to focus attention on the subject.
anonymous
193
Supports ANT+
Comment
Yes
vs
No
ANT+ is a wireless protocol similar to Bluetooth Smart, and is very power efficient. It is mainly used for fitness monitoring devices such as heart rate monitors and cadence sensors to connect to other devices, eg. sports watches, smartphones and cycling computers.
anonymous
192
Has manual exposure
Comment
Yes
vs
No
This allows to manually set the exposure.
anonymous
185
Distinctly smaller semiconductor size
Comment
28 nm
vs
32 nm
4 nm smaller semiconductor size. A smaller size indicates that the process to create the chip is newer.
anonymous
176
Significantly faster uploads
Comment
50 MBits/s
vs
5.76 MBits/s
8.68x faster uploads
anonymous
167
Higher GeekBench result
Comment
752
vs
428
Higher GeekBench result. This is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the performance of the CPU. (Source: Primate Labs, 2014)
anonymous
125
A shade narrower
Comment
69.8 mm
vs
70.6 mm
0.80 mm narrower
Faizan Ali
13
Ir blaster
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Have a ir blaster
Navjot Sethi
5
Support 4k
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Because of 4.4 kitkat android
Yogesh Dembla
2
Has soft feather touch button for settings
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Filsuf Navas
2
Has functional NFC
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Faizan Ali
2
Andriod 4.4.4?
Comment
Yes
vs
No
No problem can flash cm11 & you're good to go true vanilla goodness on palm of your hand.
Show more reasons
Android 4.4 KitKat (API level 19)
Yes
vs
No
Top 3 Reasons for Android 4.4 KitKat (API level 19)
anonymous
551
Supports 4K resolution
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Allows you to view in ultra-high definition.
anonymous
265
Is a multi-user system
Comment
Yes
vs
No
anonymous
252
Supports OpenGL ES 3.0, allowing for improved game graphics
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 APQ8064AB
Yes
vs
No
Top 3 Reasons for Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 APQ8064AB
anonymous
188
Has integrated LTE
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The system on a chip (SoC) has an integrated LTE cellular chip. LTE is capable of downloading at faster speeds than older, 3G technology.
anonymous
143
Appreciably higher ram speed
Comment
600 MHz
vs
400 MHz
200 MHz higher ram speed. It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.
anonymous
91
Has dynamic frequency scaling
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Dynamic frequency scaling is a technology that allows the processor to conserve power and reduce noise when it is under a light load.
Qualcomm Krait 300
Yes
vs
No
Top 4 Reasons for Qualcomm Krait 300
anonymous
75
Vastly wider front-end
Comment
3
vs
2
1 wider front-end. The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better
anonymous
66
Supports hardware-assisted virtualization
Comment
Yes
vs
No
It is easier to obtain better performance when using virtualization if it is hardware-assisted.
anonymous
43
Substantially more bits executed at a time
Comment
128
vs
64
64 more bits executed at a time. NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.
anonymous
38
Noticeably newer version of VFP
Comment
4
vs
3
1 newer version of VFP. Vector Floating-Point (VFP) is used by the processor to deliver increased performance in areas such as digital imaging.
Qualcomm Adreno 320 (450MHz)
Yes
vs
No
Top 4 Reasons for Qualcomm Adreno 320 (450MHz)
anonymous
113
Notably higher floating-point performance
Comment
0.057 TFLOPS
vs
0.02 TFLOPS
0.04 TFLOPS higher floating-point performance. Floating-point performance is a measurement of the raw processing power of the GPU.
anonymous
74
Considerably higher pixel rate
Comment
3.2 GPixel/s
vs
0.5 GPixel/s
2.70 GPixel/s higher pixel rate. The number of pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.
anonymous
66
Newer version of OpenGL ES
Comment
3
vs
2
Newer version of OpenGL ES. OpenGL ES is used for games on mobile devices such as smartphones. Newer versions support better graphics.
anonymous
50
Newer version of OpenVG
Comment
3
vs
1.1
Newer version of OpenVG. OpenVG is used to improve the rendering of 2D graphics on mobile devices, for example the user interface (UI) on a smartphone.

Samsung Galaxy S4 is better than Samsung Galaxy S3 because...

Yes
vs
No

Top Seven Reasons for the

Samsung Galaxy S3

Compared to Samsung Galaxy S4

anonymous
206
Appreciably bigger pixel size
Comment
2 µm²
vs
1.3 µm²
0.70 µm² bigger pixel size. Pixel size is the surface area of each pixel on the camera sensor. Larger pixels can absorb more light. This can result in better image quality and improved low-light performance.
anonymous
115
Lower SAR for body (USA)
Comment
1.49 W/kg
vs
1.55 W/kg
0.06 W/kg lower SAR for body (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at hip level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.
anonymous
106
Explicitly lower SAR for head (USA)
Comment
0.55 W/kg
vs
0.85 W/kg
0.30 W/kg lower SAR for head (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.
anonymous
81
Has directory organization
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A directory helps to keep your music, videos and e-books organized and easy to find.
Rockingrocking Boy Aakshay
5
Good pic capture at night
Comment
Yes
vs
No
It has better camera at night
Dami Agunbiade
2
Zero Shutter Lag
Comment
Yes
vs
No
This means photos are much more sharper and can be taken in less than 0.5 seconds
Samsung Exynos 4412
Yes
vs
No
Top 0 Reasons for Samsung Exynos 4412
ARM Mali 400 MP4
Yes
vs
No
Top 1 Reason for ARM Mali 400 MP4
anonymous
216
Clearly faster GPU clock speed
Comment
533 MHz
vs
450 MHz
83 MHz faster GPU clock speed. The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.

Samsung Galaxy S3 is better than Samsung Galaxy S4 because...

Yes
vs
No

Compare with other products

x
Join