Download the official Versus Android app now Android app on Google Play

Samsung Galaxy S4 vs Samsung Galaxy S3

Top 39 Reasons for the

Samsung Galaxy S4

Compared to Samsung Galaxy S3

anonymous
2132
More battery power
Comment
2600 mAh
vs
2100 mAh
23.81% more battery power
anonymous
1633
Reasonably faster CPU clock speed
Comment
4 x 1.9 GHz
vs
4 x 1.4 GHz
35.71% faster CPU clock speed
anonymous
1350
Measurably higher pixel density
Comment
441 ppi
vs
306 ppi
44.12% higher pixel density
anonymous
1172
Plenty more RAM memory
Comment
2 GB
vs
1 GB
1 GB more RAM memory
anonymous
1053
A little bit bigger screen size
Comment
5 "
vs
4.8 "
4.17% bigger screen size. The bigger the screen size is, the better the user experience.
anonymous
973
Measurably more megapixels (photo)
Comment
13 MP
vs
8 MP
1.63x more megapixels (photo)
anonymous
963
Sizably higher resolution
Comment
1920x1080 px
vs
1280x720 px
2.25x higher resolution
anonymous
690
Much more megapixel (photo, front camera)
Comment
2 MP
vs
1.9 MP
5.26% more megapixel (photo, front camera)
anonymous
448
Noticeably faster downloads
Comment
100 MBits/s
vs
21 MBits/s
4.76x faster downloads
anonymous
386
Slightly lighter
Comment
130 g
vs
133 g
3 g lighter
anonymous
368
A bit thinner
Comment
7.9 mm
vs
8.6 mm
0.70 mm thinner
anonymous
366
Significantly more internal storage
Comment
64 GB
vs
16 GB
48 GB more internal storage
anonymous
344
Wireless charging
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The manufacturer offers a branded wireless charging kit. To charge the device, you simply put it down on its charging base.
anonymous
323
Has fast 802.11ac WiFi connection
Comment
Yes
vs
No
802.11ac wireless works on the 5GHz frequency range. It offers higher transfer rates, improved reliability and improved power consumption. It provides advantages for gaming and HD video streaming.
anonymous
228
Wider aperture at minimum focal length
Comment
2.2
vs
2.6
Wider aperture at minimum focal length. With a wider aperture the sensor can capture more light, helping to avoid blur by enabling a faster shutter speed. It also provides a shallow depth of field, allowing you to blur the background to focus attention on the subject.
anonymous
158
Has manual exposure
Comment
Yes
vs
No
This allows to manually set the exposure.
anonymous
151
Notably faster uploads
Comment
50 MBits/s
vs
5.76 MBits/s
8.68x faster uploads
anonymous
139
Substantially smaller semiconductor size
Comment
28 nm
vs
32 nm
4 nm smaller semiconductor size. A smaller size indicates that the process to create the chip is newer.
anonymous
119
Supports ANT+
Comment
Yes
vs
No
ANT+ is a wireless protocol similar to Bluetooth Smart, and is very power efficient. It is mainly used for fitness monitoring devices such as heart rate monitors and cadence sensors to connect to other devices, eg. sports watches, smartphones and cycling computers.
anonymous
113
Higher GeekBench result
Comment
752
vs
428
Higher GeekBench result. This is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the performance of the CPU. (Source: Primate Labs, 2014)
anonymous
-65
A shade narrower
Comment
69.8 mm
vs
70.6 mm
0.80 mm narrower
anonymous
-135
Slightly less body volume
Comment
75.32 cm³
vs
82.94 cm³
10.12% less body volume
Android 4.4 KitKat (API level 19)
Yes
vs
No
Top 6 Reasons for Android 4.4 KitKat (API level 19)
anonymous
347
Supports 4K resolution
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Allows you to view in ultra-high definition.
anonymous
206
Supports OpenGL ES 3.0, allowing for improved game graphics
Comment
Yes
vs
No
anonymous
109
Is a multi-user system
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Karthik Thangavelu
1
Has Google maps
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Google maps is way better than here maps
Karthik Thangavelu
1
Has a lot of customization options
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Karthik Thangavelu
1
Has Google now which is better than SIRI
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 APQ8064AB
Yes
vs
No
Top 3 Reasons for Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 APQ8064AB
anonymous
77
Notably higher ram speed
Comment
600 MHz
vs
400 MHz
200 MHz higher ram speed. It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.
anonymous
64
Has integrated LTE
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The system on a chip (SoC) has an integrated LTE cellular chip. LTE is capable of downloading at faster speeds than older, 3G technology.
anonymous
61
Has dynamic frequency scaling
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Dynamic frequency scaling is a technology that allows the processor to conserve power and reduce noise when it is under a light load.
Qualcomm Krait 300
Yes
vs
No
Top 4 Reasons for Qualcomm Krait 300
anonymous
46
Explicitly wider front-end
Comment
3
vs
2
1 wider front-end. The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better
anonymous
46
Supports hardware-assisted virtualization
Comment
Yes
vs
No
It is easier to obtain better performance when using virtualization if it is hardware-assisted.
anonymous
34
Clearly more bits executed at a time
Comment
128
vs
64
64 more bits executed at a time. NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.
anonymous
33
Noticeably newer version of VFP
Comment
4
vs
3
1 newer version of VFP. Vector Floating-Point (VFP) is used by the processor to deliver increased performance in areas such as digital imaging.
Qualcomm Adreno 320 (450MHz)
Yes
vs
No
Top 4 Reasons for Qualcomm Adreno 320 (450MHz)
anonymous
62
Significantly higher floating-point performance
Comment
0.057 TFLOPS
vs
0.02 TFLOPS
0.04 TFLOPS higher floating-point performance. Floating-point performance is a measurement of the raw processing power of the GPU.
anonymous
46
Significantly higher pixel rate
Comment
3.2 GPixel/s
vs
0.5 GPixel/s
2.70 GPixel/s higher pixel rate. The number of pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.
anonymous
37
Newer version of OpenGL ES
Comment
3
vs
2
Newer version of OpenGL ES. OpenGL ES is used for games on mobile devices such as smartphones. Newer versions support better graphics.
anonymous
36
Newer version of OpenVG
Comment
3
vs
1.1
Newer version of OpenVG. OpenVG is used to improve the rendering of 2D graphics on mobile devices, for example the user interface (UI) on a smartphone.

Samsung Galaxy S4 is better than Samsung Galaxy S3 because...

Yes
vs
No

Top Eight Reasons for the

Samsung Galaxy S3

Compared to Samsung Galaxy S4

anonymous
182
Considerably bigger pixel size
Comment
2 µm²
vs
1.3 µm²
0.70 µm² bigger pixel size. Pixel size is the surface area of each pixel on the camera sensor. Larger pixels can absorb more light. This can result in better image quality and improved low-light performance.
anonymous
107
Lower SAR for body (USA)
Comment
1.49 W/kg
vs
1.55 W/kg
0.06 W/kg lower SAR for body (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at hip level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.
anonymous
94
Appreciably lower SAR for head (USA)
Comment
0.55 W/kg
vs
0.85 W/kg
0.30 W/kg lower SAR for head (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.
anonymous
74
Has directory organization
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A directory helps to keep your music, videos and e-books organized and easy to find.
anonymous
34
Has a socket for a 3.5 mm audio jack
Comment
Yes
vs
true
With a standard mini jack socket, you can use the device with most headphones.
anonymous
27
Has music playback
Comment
Yes
vs
true
The device can play mp3 music files.
Paweł Sapek
5
Supports NFC
Comment
Yes
vs
No
NFC enables wireless payments through your device. You can also connect two NFC enabled devices just by touching them with each other.
Samsung Exynos 4412
Yes
vs
No
Top 0 Reasons for Samsung Exynos 4412
ARM Mali 400 MP4
Yes
vs
No
Top 1 Reason for ARM Mali 400 MP4
anonymous
99
Noticeably faster GPU clock speed
Comment
533 MHz
vs
450 MHz
83 MHz faster GPU clock speed. The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.

Samsung Galaxy S3 is better than Samsung Galaxy S4 because...

Yes
vs
No

Compare with other products

x
Join