Top Ten Reasons for the Samsung Galaxy Young

Top Eleven Reasons for the Samsung Galaxy Trend II

 
 
Which is better? Show result
0
0

Embed this comparison:

Samsung Galaxy Young vs Samsung Galaxy Trend II

Top Ten Reasons for the

Samsung Galaxy Young

Compared to Samsung Galaxy Trend II

1755
More megapixels (photo)
Comment
3.15 MP
vs
3 MP
5% more megapixels (photo)

×

1010
Lighter
Comment
112 g
vs
127.6 g
15.60 g lighter

×

714
Notably more internal storage
Comment
4 GB
vs
0 GB
4 GB more internal storage

×

648
Has a radio
Comment
Yes
vs
No
It works as an FM radio with included headsets

×

347
Reasonably narrower
Comment
58.6 mm
vs
63.03 mm
4.43 mm narrower

×

277
Shorter
Comment
109.4 mm
vs
121.49 mm
12.09 mm shorter

×

89
A tad less body volume
Comment
81.5 cm³
vs
86.91 cm³
6.64% less body volume

×

70
Has a compass
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A compass is useful in games, map and navigation software.

×

46
Has GPS
Comment
Yes
vs
No
GPS enables global positioning, useful in map, geo-tagging or navigation apps.

×

Maaz Jamil
1
Cheap n good
Comment
Yes
vs
No
This is very cheap.. u can get good fpr cheap

×

Samsung Galaxy Young is better than Samsung Galaxy Trend II because...

Yes
vs
No

Please choose the related object

Top Eleven Reasons for the

Samsung Galaxy Trend II

Compared to Samsung Galaxy Young

3558
More battery power
Comment
1500 mAh
vs
1300 mAh
15.38% more battery power

×

2874
Appreciably faster CPU clock speed
Comment
2 x 1.2 GHz
vs
1 x 1 GHz
2.40x faster CPU clock speed

×

2434
Way higher pixel density
Comment
233 ppi
vs
176 ppi
32.39% higher pixel density

×

2016
Bigger screen size
Comment
4 "
vs
3.27 "
22.32% bigger screen size. The bigger the screen size is, the better the user experience.

×

1643
Clearly higher resolution
Comment
800x480 px
vs
480x320 px
2.50x higher resolution

×

856
Somewhat thinner
Comment
11.35 mm
vs
12.5 mm
1.15 mm thinner

×

538
Notably better video recording quality
Comment
480 x 30 fps
vs
240 x 24 fps
2.50x better video recording quality

×

133
Measurably lower SAR for body (USA)
Comment
1.08 W/kg
vs
1.28 W/kg
0.20 W/kg lower SAR for body (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at hip level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.

×

112
Distinctly lower SAR for head (USA)
Comment
0.51 W/kg
vs
1.18 W/kg
0.67 W/kg lower SAR for head (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.

×

94
Considerably lower SAR for head (EU)
Comment
0.29 W/kg
vs
0.88 W/kg
0.59 W/kg lower SAR for head (EU). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 2.0 W/kg in the EU.

×

Daxa Solanki
28
Better design
Comment
Yes
vs
No
It has a better design, it feels like a leather in hand.

×

Samsung Galaxy Trend II is better than Samsung Galaxy Young because...

Yes
vs
No

Please choose the related object

x
Join