Download the official Versus Android app now Android app on Google Play

Samsung S7710 Galaxy Xcover 2 vs HTC One X

Top Nine Reasons for the

Samsung S7710 Galaxy Xcover 2

Compared to HTC One X

anonymous
728
Has an external memory slot
Reply
Yes
vs
No
The device has a standard memory slot (such as an SD or micro SD card slot) so that you can either extend the internal storage with affordable memory modules or you can retrieve data, such as photographs, easily from a memory card.
anonymous
479
Has a removable battery
Reply
Yes
vs
No
The battery is removable and can be replaced by the user if broken.
anonymous
439
Is dustproof and water resistant
Reply
Yes
vs
No
Dustproof / water resistant at depth equal to or greater than 1m.
anonymous
301
Has a dedicated camera button
Reply
Yes
vs
No
A dedicated camera button allows you to take snapshots more easily.
anonymous
148
Weather sealed
Reply
Yes
vs
No
Device is protected with extra seals to prevent failures due to any kind of weather.
anonymous
89
Substantially lower SAR for head (USA)
Reply
0.61 W/kg
vs
0.68 W/kg
0.07 W/kg lower SAR for head (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.
anonymous
72
Substantially lower SAR for head (EU)
Reply
0.5 W/kg
vs
0.68 W/kg
0.18 W/kg lower SAR for head (EU). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 2.0 W/kg in the EU.
anonymous
-114
Narrower
Reply
67.7 mm
vs
69.9 mm
2.20 mm narrower
anonymous
-194
A shade shorter
Reply
130.5 mm
vs
134.4 mm
3.90 mm shorter

Samsung S7710 Galaxy Xcover 2 is better than HTC One X because...

Yes
vs
No

Top 20 Reasons for the

HTC One X

Compared to Samsung S7710 Galaxy Xcover 2

anonymous
1961
A little bit more battery power
Reply
1800 mAh
vs
1700 mAh
5.88% more battery power
anonymous
1514
Explicitly faster CPU clock speed
Reply
4 x 1.5 GHz
vs
2 x 1 GHz
3x faster CPU clock speed
anonymous
1243
Amply higher pixel density
Reply
312 ppi
vs
233 ppi
33.91% higher pixel density
anonymous
961
Bigger screen size
Reply
4.7 "
vs
4 "
17.50% bigger screen size. The bigger the screen size is, the better the user experience.
anonymous
903
Clearly more megapixels (photo)
Reply
8 MP
vs
5 MP
1.60x more megapixels (photo)
anonymous
900
Substantially higher resolution
Reply
1280x720 px
vs
800x480 px
2.40x higher resolution
anonymous
628
Considerably more megapixel (photo, front camera)
Reply
1.3 MP
vs
0.3 MP
4.33x more megapixel (photo, front camera)
anonymous
574
Has branded damage resistant glass
Reply
Yes
vs
No
Damage resistant glass (such as Corning Gorilla Glass or Asahi Dragontail Glass) is thin and lightweight, and can withstand high levels of force.
anonymous
406
Noticeably faster downloads
Reply
21 MBits/s
vs
14.4 MBits/s
45.83% faster downloads
anonymous
333
Lighter
Reply
130 g
vs
148.5 g
18.50 g lighter
anonymous
325
Significantly more internal storage
Reply
32 GB
vs
4 GB
28 GB more internal storage
anonymous
320
Reasonably thinner
Reply
8.9 mm
vs
12 mm
3.10 mm thinner
anonymous
296
Better video recording quality
Reply
1080 x 24 fps
vs
720 x 30 fps
20% better video recording quality
anonymous
267
Has an IPS screen
Reply
Yes
vs
No
IPS (In-Plane Switching) is a technology used for LCDs. It was designed to overcome the main limitations of normal TFTs TN-matrices: relatively slow response times, small viewing angles and low quality color reproduction.
anonymous
174
Has a BSI sensor
Reply
Yes
vs
No
A BSI (backside illuminated) sensor is a camera image sensor which captures better quality images in poor lighting conditions, and offers better overall sharpness and image quality.
anonymous
141
Distinctly more microphone(s)
Reply
2
vs
1
1 more microphone(s). More microphones result in better sound quality and enable the device to filter out background noise.
anonymous
100
Measurably lower SAR for body (USA)
Reply
0.7 W/kg
vs
1.03 W/kg
0.33 W/kg lower SAR for body (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at hip level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.
anonymous
94
Has a built-in HDR mode
Reply
Yes
vs
No
It can automatically shoot pictures with a higher dynamic range (HDR).
anonymous
86
Has a gyroscope
Reply
Yes
vs
No
A gyroscope is a sensor that can be used to either measure or maintain the orientation of a device. Traditionally, they were built using a spinning rotor to detect changes in orientation, eg. twisting or rotation.
Max Leiva
0
Build Quality in Much Higher
Reply
Yes
vs
No
Because used materials are toughter, policarbonate is much better than the cheap plastic used in every single Samsung Galaxy series. The bad quality plastic and paint on the Galaxy's ALWAYS gets marks and breaks.
anonymous
-180
Amply less body volume
Reply
84.4 cm³
vs
106 cm³
25.59% less body volume

HTC One X is better than Samsung S7710 Galaxy Xcover 2 because...

Yes
vs
No

Compare with other products

x
Join