Download the official Versus Android app now Android app on Google Play

Samsung S7710 Galaxy Xcover 2 vs HTC One X

Top Nine Reasons for the

Samsung S7710 Galaxy Xcover 2

Compared to HTC One X

anonymous
735
Has an external memory slot
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The device has a standard memory slot (such as an SD or micro SD card slot) so that you can either extend the internal storage with affordable memory modules or you can retrieve data, such as photographs, easily from a memory card.
anonymous
482
Has a removable battery
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The battery is removable and can be replaced by the user if broken.
anonymous
441
Is dustproof and water resistant
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Dustproof / water resistant at depth equal to or greater than 1m.
anonymous
305
Has a dedicated camera button
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A dedicated camera button allows you to take snapshots more easily.
anonymous
148
Weather sealed
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Device is protected with extra seals to prevent failures due to any kind of weather.
anonymous
90
Considerably lower SAR for head (USA)
Comment
0.61 W/kg
vs
0.68 W/kg
0.07 W/kg lower SAR for head (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.
anonymous
72
Noticeably lower SAR for head (EU)
Comment
0.5 W/kg
vs
0.68 W/kg
0.18 W/kg lower SAR for head (EU). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 2.0 W/kg in the EU.
anonymous
-108
Narrower
Comment
67.7 mm
vs
69.9 mm
2.20 mm narrower
anonymous
-191
A little shorter
Comment
130.5 mm
vs
134.4 mm
3.90 mm shorter

Samsung S7710 Galaxy Xcover 2 is better than HTC One X because...

Yes
vs
No

Top 20 Reasons for the

HTC One X

Compared to Samsung S7710 Galaxy Xcover 2

anonymous
1983
A little more battery power
Comment
1800 mAh
vs
1700 mAh
5.88% more battery power
anonymous
1531
Significantly faster CPU clock speed
Comment
4 x 1.5 GHz
vs
2 x 1 GHz
3x faster CPU clock speed
anonymous
1254
Much higher pixel density
Comment
312 ppi
vs
233 ppi
33.91% higher pixel density
anonymous
974
Bigger screen size
Comment
4.7 "
vs
4 "
17.50% bigger screen size. The bigger the screen size is, the better the user experience.
anonymous
908
Considerably more megapixels (photo)
Comment
8 MP
vs
5 MP
1.60x more megapixels (photo)
anonymous
906
Noticeably higher resolution
Comment
1280x720 px
vs
800x480 px
2.40x higher resolution
anonymous
637
Notably more megapixel (photo, front camera)
Comment
1.3 MP
vs
0.3 MP
4.33x more megapixel (photo, front camera)
anonymous
574
Has branded damage resistant glass
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Damage resistant glass (such as Corning Gorilla Glass or Asahi Dragontail Glass) is thin and lightweight, and can withstand high levels of force.
anonymous
411
Notably faster downloads
Comment
21 MBits/s
vs
14.4 MBits/s
45.83% faster downloads
anonymous
344
Lighter
Comment
130 g
vs
148.5 g
18.50 g lighter
anonymous
332
Sizably more internal storage
Comment
32 GB
vs
4 GB
28 GB more internal storage
anonymous
325
Reasonably thinner
Comment
8.9 mm
vs
12 mm
3.10 mm thinner
anonymous
296
Better video recording quality
Comment
1080 x 24 fps
vs
720 x 30 fps
20% better video recording quality
anonymous
272
Has an IPS screen
Comment
Yes
vs
No
IPS (In-Plane Switching) is a technology used for LCDs. It was designed to overcome the main limitations of normal TFTs TN-matrices: relatively slow response times, small viewing angles and low quality color reproduction.
anonymous
177
Has a BSI sensor
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A BSI (backside illuminated) sensor is a camera image sensor which captures better quality images in poor lighting conditions, and offers better overall sharpness and image quality.
anonymous
141
Notably more microphone(s)
Comment
2
vs
1
1 more microphone(s). More microphones result in better sound quality and enable the device to filter out background noise.
anonymous
101
Explicitly lower SAR for body (USA)
Comment
0.7 W/kg
vs
1.03 W/kg
0.33 W/kg lower SAR for body (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at hip level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.
anonymous
96
Has a built-in HDR mode
Comment
Yes
vs
No
It can automatically shoot pictures with a higher dynamic range (HDR).
anonymous
86
Has a gyroscope
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A gyroscope is a sensor that can be used to either measure or maintain the orientation of a device. Traditionally, they were built using a spinning rotor to detect changes in orientation, eg. twisting or rotation.
anonymous
-174
Way less body volume
Comment
84.4 cm³
vs
106 cm³
25.59% less body volume

HTC One X is better than Samsung S7710 Galaxy Xcover 2 because...

Yes
vs
No

Compare with other products

x
Join