Top Twelve Reasons for the Sony Xperia Go

Top Twelve Reasons for the Motorola ATRIX 2

 
 
Which is better? Show result
0
0

Embed this comparison:

Sony Xperia Go vs Motorola ATRIX 2

Top Twelve Reasons for the

Sony Xperia Go

Compared to Motorola ATRIX 2

970
Way lighter
Comment
110 g
vs
147 g
37 g lighter

×

864
Has stereo speakers
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Devices with stereo speakers deliver sound that surrounds the user from left and right side, creating a richer sound and a better experience.

×

823
A bit thinner
Comment
9.8 mm
vs
10 mm
0.20 mm thinner

×

811
Is dustproof and water resistant
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Dustproof / water resistant at depth equal to or greater than 1m.

×

334
Weather sealed
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Device is protected with extra seals to prevent failures due to any kind of weather.

×

332
Significantly narrower
Comment
60.3 mm
vs
66 mm
5.70 mm narrower

×

263
Newer Bluetooth version
Comment
3
vs
2.1
Newer Bluetooth version

×

260
Has a video light
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A video light helps when recording a movie in low-light situation like a party.

×

257
Much shorter
Comment
111 mm
vs
126 mm
15 mm shorter

×

151
Has a gyroscope
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A gyroscope is a sensor that can be used to either measure or maintain the orientation of a device. Traditionally, they were built using a spinning rotor to detect changes in orientation, eg. twisting or rotation.

×

130
Measurably lower SAR for body (USA)
Comment
0.96 W/kg
vs
1.15 W/kg
0.19 W/kg lower SAR for body (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at hip level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.

×

78
Reasonably less body volume
Comment
65.6 cm³
vs
83 cm³
26.52% less body volume

×

Sony Xperia Go is better than Motorola ATRIX 2 because...

Yes
vs
No

Please choose the related object

Top Twelve Reasons for the

Motorola ATRIX 2

Compared to Sony Xperia Go

3484
Amply more battery power
Comment
1785 mAh
vs
1305 mAh
36.78% more battery power

×

2378
Measurably higher pixel density
Comment
256 ppi
vs
165 ppi
1.55x higher pixel density

×

1973
Bigger screen size
Comment
4.3 "
vs
3.5 "
22.86% bigger screen size. The bigger the screen size is, the better the user experience.

×

1712
Measurably more megapixels (photo)
Comment
8 MP
vs
5 MP
1.60x more megapixels (photo)

×

1658
Reasonably more RAM memory
Comment
1 GB
vs
0.5 GB
0.50 GB more RAM memory

×

1615
Noticeably higher resolution
Comment
960x540 px
vs
480x320 px
3.38x higher resolution

×

950
Has a removable battery
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The battery is removable and can be replaced by the user if broken.

×

647
Significantly faster downloads
Comment
21 MBits/s
vs
14.4 MBits/s
45.83% faster downloads

×

526
Better video recording quality
Comment
1080 x 24 fps
vs
720 x 30 fps
20% better video recording quality

×

118
Has a front camera
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A front camera can be used for video chats / self portraits.

×

112
Has a HDMI output
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Devices with a HDMI or mini HDMI port can transfer high definition video and audio to a display.

×

112
Appreciably lower SAR for head (USA)
Comment
1.01 W/kg
vs
1.12 W/kg
0.11 W/kg lower SAR for head (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.

×

Motorola ATRIX 2 is better than Sony Xperia Go because...

Yes
vs
No

Please choose the related object

x
Join