Sony Xperia Go vs Motorola ATRIX 2

Top Twelve Reasons for the

Sony Xperia Go

Compared to Motorola ATRIX 2

anonymous
761
Reasonably lighter
Comment
110 g
vs
147 g
37 g lighter
anonymous
748
Has stereo speakers
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Devices with stereo speakers deliver sound that surrounds the user from left and right side, creating a richer sound and a better experience.
anonymous
709
Is dustproof and water resistant
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Dustproof / water resistant at depth equal to or greater than 1m.
anonymous
655
A bit thinner
Comment
9.8 mm
vs
10 mm
0.20 mm thinner
anonymous
274
Weather sealed
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Device is protected with extra seals to prevent failures due to any kind of weather.
anonymous
222
Newer Bluetooth version
Comment
3
vs
2.1
Newer Bluetooth version
anonymous
218
Has a video light
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A video light helps when recording a movie in low-light situation like a party.
anonymous
198
Notably narrower
Comment
60.3 mm
vs
66 mm
5.70 mm narrower
anonymous
143
Plenty shorter
Comment
111 mm
vs
126 mm
15 mm shorter
anonymous
121
Distinctly lower SAR for body (USA)
Comment
0.96 W/kg
vs
1.15 W/kg
0.19 W/kg lower SAR for body (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at hip level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.
anonymous
119
Has a gyroscope
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A gyroscope is a sensor that can be used to either measure or maintain the orientation of a device. Traditionally, they were built using a spinning rotor to detect changes in orientation, eg. twisting or rotation.
anonymous
31
Much less body volume
Comment
65.6 cm³
vs
83 cm³
26.52% less body volume

Sony Xperia Go is better than Motorola ATRIX 2 because...

Yes
vs
No

Top Twelve Reasons for the

Motorola ATRIX 2

Compared to Sony Xperia Go

anonymous
2984
Lots more battery power
Comment
1785 mAh
vs
1305 mAh
36.78% more battery power
anonymous
2030
Significantly higher pixel density
Comment
256 ppi
vs
165 ppi
1.55x higher pixel density
anonymous
1635
Bigger screen size
Comment
4.3 "
vs
3.5 "
22.86% bigger screen size. The bigger the screen size is, the better the user experience.
anonymous
1497
Lots more RAM memory
Comment
1 GB
vs
0.5 GB
0.50 GB more RAM memory
anonymous
1476
Measurably more megapixels (photo)
Comment
8 MP
vs
5 MP
1.60x more megapixels (photo)
anonymous
1399
Significantly higher resolution
Comment
960x540 px
vs
480x320 px
3.38x higher resolution
anonymous
817
Has a removable battery
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The battery is removable and can be replaced by the user if broken.
anonymous
581
Appreciably faster downloads
Comment
21 MBits/s
vs
14.4 MBits/s
45.83% faster downloads
anonymous
456
Better video recording quality
Comment
1080 x 24 fps
vs
720 x 30 fps
20% better video recording quality
anonymous
109
Has a front camera
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A front camera can be used for video chats / self portraits.
anonymous
108
Noticeably lower SAR for head (USA)
Comment
1.01 W/kg
vs
1.12 W/kg
0.11 W/kg lower SAR for head (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.
anonymous
107
Has a HDMI output
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Devices with a HDMI or mini HDMI port can transfer high definition video and audio to a display.

Motorola ATRIX 2 is better than Sony Xperia Go because...

Yes
vs
No

Compare with other products

x
Join