Top Twelve Reasons for the Sony Xperia Go

Top Twelve Reasons for the Motorola ATRIX 2

 
 
Which is better? Show result
0
0

Sony Xperia Go vs Motorola ATRIX 2

Top Twelve Reasons for the

Sony Xperia Go

Compared to Motorola ATRIX 2

1046
Reasonably lighter
Comment
110g
vs
147g
37g lighter

×

904
Has stereo speakers
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Devices with stereo speakers deliver sound that surrounds the user from left and right side, creating a richer sound and a better experience.

×

887
A tad thinner
Comment
9.8mm
vs
10mm
0.20mm thinner

×

840
Is dustproof and water resistant
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Dustproof / water resistant at depth equal to or greater than 1m.

×

370
Clearly narrower
Comment
60.3mm
vs
66mm
5.70mm narrower

×

351
Weather sealed
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Device is protected with extra seals to prevent failures due to any kind of weather.

×

296
Amply shorter
Comment
111mm
vs
126mm
15mm shorter

×

277
Newer Bluetooth version
Comment
3
vs
2.1
Newer Bluetooth version

×

270
Has a video light
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A video light helps when recording a movie in low-light situation like a party.

×

160
Has a gyroscope
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A gyroscope is a sensor that can be used to either measure or maintain the orientation of a device. Traditionally, they were built using a spinning rotor to detect changes in orientation, eg. twisting or rotation.

×

134
Sizably lower SAR for body (USA)
Comment
0.96W/kg
vs
1.15W/kg
0.19W/kg lower SAR for body (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at hip level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.

×

99
Amply less body volume
Comment
65.6cm³
vs
83cm³
26.52% less body volume

×

Sony Xperia Go is better than Motorola ATRIX 2 because...

Yes
vs
No

Please choose the related object

Top Twelve Reasons for the

Motorola ATRIX 2

Compared to Sony Xperia Go

3625
Plenty more battery power
Comment
1785mAh
vs
1305mAh
36.78% more battery power

×

2484
Sizably higher pixel density
Comment
256ppi
vs
165ppi
1.55x higher pixel density

×

2051
Bigger screen size
Comment
4.3"
vs
3.5"
22.86% bigger screen size. The bigger the screen size is, the better the user experience.

×

1781
Clearly more megapixels (photo)
Comment
8MP
vs
5MP
1.60x more megapixels (photo)

×

1722
Way more RAM memory
Comment
1GB
vs
0.5GB
0.50GB more RAM memory

×

1675
Measurably higher resolution
Comment
960x540px
vs
480x320px
3.38x higher resolution

×

985
Has a removable battery
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The battery is removable and can be replaced by the user if broken.

×

667
Distinctly faster downloads
Comment
21MBits/s
vs
14.4MBits/s
45.83% faster downloads

×

549
Better video recording quality
Comment
1080 x 24fps
vs
720 x 30fps
20% better video recording quality

×

120
Has a front camera
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A front camera can be used for video chats / self portraits.

×

116
Has a HDMI output
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Devices with a HDMI or mini HDMI port can transfer high definition video and audio to a display.

×

112
Appreciably lower SAR for head (USA)
Comment
1.01W/kg
vs
1.12W/kg
0.11W/kg lower SAR for head (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.

×

Motorola ATRIX 2 is better than Sony Xperia Go because...

Yes
vs
No

Please choose the related object

x
Join