Sony Xperia S vs Sony Xperia T

Top Nine Reasons for the

Sony Xperia S

Compared to Sony Xperia T

anonymous
1828
Somewhat higher pixel density
Comment
341 ppi
vs
323 ppi
5.57% higher pixel density
anonymous
328
Has a dual-LED flash
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A dual-led flash has led lights with different color temperatures, delivering a better color balance to photos and videos.
anonymous
313
Has a two-stage shutter
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A two-stage shutter is good for taking photos like a pro; apply pressure to the button in order for the lens to focus, and then press it fully to capture the photograph.
anonymous
123
Narrower
Comment
64 mm
vs
67.3 mm
3.30 mm narrower
anonymous
104
Has a HDMI output
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Devices with a HDMI or mini HDMI port can transfer high definition video and audio to a display.
anonymous
66
A little bit shorter
Comment
128 mm
vs
129.4 mm
1.40 mm shorter
Jacek Lenard
7
It has NFC
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Jacek Lenard
1
Has lightbar for informations
Comment
Yes
vs
No
anonymous
-14
Somewhat less body volume
Comment
86.8 cm³
vs
91.01 cm³
4.85% less body volume

Sony Xperia S is better than Sony Xperia T because...

Yes
vs
No

Top 14 Reasons for the

Sony Xperia T

Compared to Sony Xperia S

anonymous
2720
Somewhat more battery power
Comment
1850 mAh
vs
1750 mAh
5.71% more battery power
anonymous
1448
A shade bigger screen size
Comment
4.55 "
vs
4.3 "
5.81% bigger screen size. The bigger the screen size is, the better the user experience.
anonymous
1317
Amply more megapixels (photo)
Comment
13 MP
vs
12.1 MP
7.44% more megapixels (photo)
anonymous
1045
Has an external memory slot
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The device has a standard memory slot (such as an SD or micro SD card slot) so that you can either extend the internal storage with affordable memory modules or you can retrieve data, such as photographs, easily from a memory card.
anonymous
676
Has stereo speakers
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Devices with stereo speakers deliver sound that surrounds the user from left and right side, creating a richer sound and a better experience.
anonymous
652
A little bit lighter
Comment
139 g
vs
144 g
5 g lighter
anonymous
561
Thinner
Comment
9.4 mm
vs
10.6 mm
1.20 mm thinner
anonymous
540
Notably faster downloads
Comment
42.2 MBits/s
vs
14.4 MBits/s
2.93x faster downloads
anonymous
185
Notably smaller semiconductor size
Comment
28 nm
vs
45 nm
17 nm smaller semiconductor size. A smaller size indicates that the process to create the chip is newer.
anonymous
166
Higher GeekBench result
Comment
511
vs
387
Higher GeekBench result. This is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the performance of the CPU. (Source: Primate Labs, 2014)
anonymous
85
Appreciably lower SAR for head (EU)
Comment
0.85 W/kg
vs
1.3 W/kg
0.45 W/kg lower SAR for head (EU). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 2.0 W/kg in the EU.
Rahiq Mahbub
31
PlayStation Mobile Certified
Comment
Yes
vs
No
This Xperia can play apps & games from PlayStation Mobile platform. US/EU PSN ID is required to use this feature.
Samuel Harper
8
Small Apps
Comment
Yes
vs
No
It can run floating small apps on the top of the app you are using.
Samuel Harper
7
NFC
Comment
Yes
vs
No
NFC for fastest sharing

Sony Xperia T is better than Sony Xperia S because...

Yes
vs
No

Compare with other products

x
Join