Sony Xperia tipo vs Samsung Galaxy I9001 S Plus

Top 13 Reasons for the

Sony Xperia tipo

Compared to Samsung Galaxy I9001 S Plus

anonymous
819
Every pixel has three subpixels.
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The device has a display with three full subpixels per pixel, resulting in a sharp and crisp picture. Pixels in some displays (like AMOLED) share one subpixel to preserve space. This can result in a less crisp, slightly blurred image.
anonymous
691
Lighter
Comment
99.4 g
vs
119 g
19.60 g lighter
anonymous
148
Significantly narrower
Comment
57 mm
vs
64.2 mm
7.20 mm narrower
anonymous
116
Appreciably lower SAR for body (USA)
Comment
0.74 W/kg
vs
0.94 W/kg
0.20 W/kg lower SAR for body (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at hip level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.
anonymous
94
Vastly shorter
Comment
103 mm
vs
122.4 mm
19.40 mm shorter
anonymous
8
A tad less body volume
Comment
76.3 cm³
vs
77.3 cm³
1.31% less body volume
Vehid Sezairi
2
Das
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Das
Agmir Latifi
1
Has a Android Version
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Jelly Bean 4.0.1
Android 4.0.3–4.0.4 Ice Cream Sandwich (API level 15)
Yes
vs
No
Top 5 Reasons for Android 4.0.3–4.0.4 Ice Cream Sandwich (API level 15)
anonymous
362
The browser has word wrap
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The web browser has automatic word wrap when zooming, the user can easily read long lines without scrolling horizontally.
anonymous
112
Supports bookmarks sync across different devices
Comment
Yes
vs
No
anonymous
45
You can take a screenshot of your phone's screen
Comment
Yes
vs
No
anonymous
35
Can create panoramas in-camera
Comment
Yes
vs
No
It allows you to take multiple photos capturing different parts of the scene, and then joins them together into a single photo.

Sony Xperia tipo is better than Samsung Galaxy I9001 S Plus because...

Yes
vs
No

Top 18 Reasons for the

Samsung Galaxy I9001 S Plus

Compared to Sony Xperia tipo

anonymous
2809
Somewhat more battery power
Comment
1650 mAh
vs
1500 mAh
10% more battery power
anonymous
2262
Noticeably faster CPU clock speed
Comment
1 x 1.4 GHz
vs
1 x 0.8 GHz
1.75x faster CPU clock speed
anonymous
1903
A lot higher pixel density
Comment
233 ppi
vs
180 ppi
29.44% higher pixel density
anonymous
1523
Bigger screen size
Comment
4 "
vs
3.2 "
25% bigger screen size. The bigger the screen size is, the better the user experience.
anonymous
1383
Clearly more megapixels (photo)
Comment
5 MP
vs
3.15 MP
1.59x more megapixels (photo)
anonymous
1331
Noticeably higher resolution
Comment
800x480 px
vs
480x320 px
2.50x higher resolution
anonymous
867
Has branded damage resistant glass
Comment
Yes
vs
No
Damage resistant glass (such as Corning Gorilla Glass or Asahi Dragontail Glass) is thin and lightweight, and can withstand high levels of force.
anonymous
594
Plenty thinner
Comment
9.9 mm
vs
13 mm
3.10 mm thinner
anonymous
556
Significantly faster downloads
Comment
14.4 MBits/s
vs
7.2 MBits/s
2x faster downloads
anonymous
525
Sizably more internal storage
Comment
16 GB
vs
2.9 GB
13.10 GB more internal storage
anonymous
482
Is DLNA certified
Comment
Yes
vs
No
All DLNA certified products are compatible with one another. When different devices are connected to the same network, data can be transferred easily between them.
anonymous
429
Significantly better video recording quality
Comment
720 x 30 fps
vs
480 x 30 fps
1.50x better video recording quality
anonymous
208
Newer Bluetooth version
Comment
3
vs
2.1
Newer Bluetooth version
anonymous
124
Has a flash
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A flash is good for low-light environments, and can sometimes be used as flashlight.
anonymous
107
Clearly lower SAR for head (USA)
Comment
0.44 W/kg
vs
1.37 W/kg
0.93 W/kg lower SAR for head (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA.
anonymous
105
Has a front camera
Comment
Yes
vs
No
A front camera can be used for video chats / self portraits.
anonymous
85
Explicitly lower SAR for head (EU)
Comment
0.35 W/kg
vs
0.62 W/kg
0.27 W/kg lower SAR for head (EU). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 2.0 W/kg in the EU.
anonymous
80
Has touch autofocus
Comment
Yes
vs
No
The autofocus is immediately set to the subject by just touching it on the touch screen.

Samsung Galaxy I9001 S Plus is better than Sony Xperia tipo because...

Yes
vs
No

Compare with other products

x
Join