64points

Acer B193 DJbmdh

63points

BenQ GW2450

Comparison winner
Acer B193 DJbmdh
BenQ GW2450
vs
vs

21 facts in comparison

Acer B193 DJbmdh vs BenQ GW2450

Acer B193 DJbmdh
BenQ GW2450
Acer B193 DJbmdh
BenQ GW2450
64
points
63
points

Why is Acer B193 DJbmdh better than BenQ GW2450?

  • 6.5W lower power consumption on operation
    18.5W vs25W
  • 79mm shorter
    358mmvs437mm
  • Has stereo speakers
  • Has a swivel stand
  • 172mm narrower
    408mmvs580mm
  • Supports digital input

Why is BenQ GW2450 better than Acer B193 DJbmdh?

  • 1ms less response time
    4msvs5ms
  • 26.32% bigger screen size
    24"vs19"
  • 1.58x higher resolution
    1920 x 1080pxvs1280 x 1024px
  • 18º wider horizontal viewing angle
    178ºvs160º
  • Has an LED-backlit display
  • 0.23W lower power consumption on standby
    0.3W vs0.53W
  • 19mm thinner
    179mmvs198mm
  • Supports VESA mount

Top specs and features

General info

1.supports total tilt
Acer B193 DJbmdh
BenQ GW2450

Total tilt adjustment is the ability for the monitor head to move up and down. Tilt adjustment enables a user to change the viewing position of the display, creating a more comfortable view of the screen.

2.height

358mm

437mm

Best

Asus VP228N 21.5"

3.9mm

3.thickness

198mm

179mm

Best

LG 22EA53VQ

5.5mm

4.Has a swivel stand
Acer B193 DJbmdh
BenQ GW2450

A swivel stand allows you to adjust the position of the display left or right, so you can position it to the desired angle.

5.Supports VESA mount
Acer B193 DJbmdh
BenQ GW2450

The VESA mount is a standard used by most manufacturers. A device that supports the VESA mount can be mounted on many different supports, from arms to wall mounts.

6.width

408mm

580mm

Best

Toshiba PA3923U-2LC3

340.5mm

Display

1.response time

5ms

4ms

Response time is how long it takes for a display to change the state of pixels, in order to show new content. The less time it takes to respond, the less likely it is to blur fast-changing images.

Best

LG UltraGear 34GK950F 34"

1ms

2.screen size

19"

24"

The bigger the screen size is, the better the user experience.

Best

Sharp LB-1085

108"

3.resolution

1280 x 1024px

1920 x 1080px

Best

Dell UltraSharp UP3218K

7680 x 4320px

4.every pixel has three subpixels
Acer B193 DJbmdh
BenQ GW2450

The device has a display with three full subpixels per pixel, resulting in a sharp and crisp picture. Pixels in some displays (like AMOLED) share one subpixel to preserve space. This can result in a less crisp, slightly blurred image.

5.maximum horizontal viewing angle

160º

178º

Horizontal viewing angle is the maximum angle at which a display can be viewed with acceptable visual performance.

Best

LG UltraGear 34GK950F 34"

178º

6.has an LED-backlit display
Acer B193 DJbmdh
BenQ GW2450

Uses LED backlighting, resulting in better image quality, more vibrant colors and richer blacks.

Colors

1.luminance

250cd/m²

250cd/m²

Luminance is the intensity of light that a device emits.

Best

Acer Predator X35 35" UW-UXGA

1000cd/m²

2.display colors

16.7m

16.7m

Number of colors that a display can accurately reproduce.

Best

Dell UltraSharp UP2716D 27"

1074m

Connectivity

1.has a VGA connector
Acer B193 DJbmdh
BenQ GW2450

VGA connector is a widespread connector and is found on many video cards, computer monitors, and some television sets.

Power

1.power consumption operation

18.5W

25W

How much power the device consumes when it's switched on.

Best

Sharp LB-1085

1.1W

2.power consumption on standby

0.53W

0.3W

How much power the device consumes when shut down but still plugged in.

Best

Asus MB168B Plus

0W

Features

1.has stereo speakers
Acer B193 DJbmdh
BenQ GW2450

Devices with stereo speakers deliver sound from independent channels on both left and right sides, creating a richer sound and a better experience.

Miscellaneous

1.supports digital input
Acer B193 DJbmdh
BenQ GW2450

Digital inputs carry a binary digital signal, instead of an analog signal. Digital input improves the quality of the projection.

Videos

Powered by

Top 10 monitors

Add to comparison
    This page is currently only available in English.