Acer Predator XB321HKPhilips 248C3LHSB/00
Top 76%208 points
Top 76%
Top 30%591 points
Top 30%
Acer Predator XB321HK
Philips 248C3LHSB/00
vs
Top specs and features

Acer Predator XB321HK vs Philips 248C3LHSB/00: 15 facts in comparison

1. every pixel has three subpixels

The device has a display with three full subpixels per pixel, resulting in a sharp and crisp picture. Pixels in some displays (like AMOLED) share one subpixel to preserve space. This can result in a less crisp, slightly blurred image.
Acer Predator XB321HK
Philips 248C3LHSB/00
85% have it

2. screen size

The bigger the screen size is, the better the user experience.
32"
Sharp LB-1085: 108"
23.6"

3. has a HDMI output

Devices with a HDMI or mini HDMI port can transfer high definition video and audio to a display.
Acer Predator XB321HK
Philips 248C3LHSB/00
60% have it

4. supports total tilt

Total tilt adjustment is the ability for the monitor head to move up and down. Tilt adjustment enables a user to change the viewing position of the display, creating a more comfortable view of the screen.
Acer Predator XB321HK
Philips 248C3LHSB/00
83% have it

5. has an IPS screen

IPS (In-Plane Switching) is a technology used for LCDs. It was designed to overcome the main limitations of normal TFTs TN-matrices: relatively slow response times, small viewing angles and low quality color reproduction.
Acer Predator XB321HK
Philips 248C3LHSB/00
33% have it

6. weight

1.87kg lighter.
1.13kg
Asus VX278Q 27": 4.5g
3kg

7. resolution

4x higher resolution.
3840 x 2160px
Dell UltraSharp UP3218K: 7680 x 4320px
1920 x 1080px

8. height

93mm shorter.
462mm
Asus VP228N 21.5": 3.9mm
369mm

9. has a VGA connector

VGA connector is a widespread connector and is found on many video cards, computer monitors, and some television sets.
Acer Predator XB321HK
Philips 248C3LHSB/00
76% have it

10. has an LED-backlit display

Uses LED backlighting, resulting in better image quality, more vibrant colors and richer blacks.
Acer Predator XB321HK
Philips 248C3LHSB/00
79% have it

11. thickness

276.9mm thinner.
309.9mm
LG 22EA53VQ: 5.5mm
33mm

12. width

158.9mm narrower.
737.9mm
Toshiba PA3923U-2LC3: 340.5mm
579mm

13. supports digital input

Digital inputs carry a binary digital signal, instead of an analog signal. Digital input improves the quality of the projection.
Acer Predator XB321HK
Philips 248C3LHSB/00
17% have it

14. has a touch screen

You can operate the device easily, by pressing the screen with your fingers.
Acer Predator XB321HK
Philips 248C3LHSB/00
5% have it

15. has a glossy panel

The glossy panel provides in general more vivid and vibrant colors compared to a matte panel.
Acer Predator XB321HK
Philips 248C3LHSB/00
8% have it

Top 10 monitors

Add to comparison
  • Acer Predator XB321HK
  • Philips 248C3LHSB/00
Compare
This page is currently only available in English.