| AKG K240 MKII | JVC HA-NC260 |
Top 48%735 points Top 48% 26 likes | Top 41%833 points Top 41% 30 likes |
 |  vs |
Top specs and features
AKG K240 MKII vs JVC HA-NC260: 22 facts in comparison
1. highest frequency
The highest frequency at which device produces audio. The higher the high-frequency response, the clearer and crispier the treble.
25000Hz
Sony MDR-Z1R: 120000Hz
24000Hz
2. lowest frequency
The lowest frequency at which the device produces audio. The lower the low-frequency response, the stronger and juicier the bass.
15Hz
Sony MH1CBLK: 1Hz
8Hz
3. weight
90g lighter.
240g
Sony MDR-EX150AP: 3g
150g
4. impedance
Impedance is the device’s electrical resistance to the current being pushed through it. The lower the impedance, the easier it is to get higher volume and requires less power.
55 Ohms
Flips Solo 2 Social: 4 Ohms
40 Ohms
5. has a neodymium magnet
Devices with neodymium magnets are lighter and more powerful than those which use ferrite magnets. They also have more bass and clear high notes.
AKG K240 MKII
JVC HA-NC260
35% have it
6. sound pressure level
Devices with a higher sound pressure level are generally louder when supplied with any given audio source.
104dB/mW
AKG K553 Pro: 144dB/mW
102dB/mW
7. no battery needed
This device works without batteries. It weighs less and you don't have to worry about recharging or replacing the battery.
AKG K240 MKII
JVC HA-NC260
69% have it
8. has a detachable cable
With a detachable cable you can use alternative cables, and if the cable is pulled it will pop out instead of breaking.
AKG K240 MKII
JVC HA-NC260
39% have it
9. can be folded
Folding devices are good for transporting as they take up less space in your bag.
AKG K240 MKII
JVC HA-NC260
31% have it
10. has a tangle free cable
The cable is designed to minimize tangling.
AKG K240 MKII
JVC HA-NC260
24% have it
11. has stereo speakers
Devices with stereo speakers deliver sound from independent channels on both left and right sides, creating a richer sound and a better experience.
AKG K240 MKII
JVC HA-NC260
76% have it
12. driver unit size
The driver unit is the component that produces sound in the device. Bigger drivers are more powerful and can produce better bass.
30mm
Audeze LCD2 Classic: 106mm
40mm
13. has an over-the-ear form
Comfortable full-size form with earcups that fully enclose your ears. This model is loved for its increased sound isolation and the fact that it won't leak sound to your neighbors. It offers potential for maximum bass and loudness levels.
AKG K240 MKII
JVC HA-NC260
40% have it
14. has active noise canceling/noise reduction
This type of device allows you to listen at lower volume levels, causing less ear fatigue as you don't have to crank up the volume to overcome background noise. Ideal for plane rides and morning commutes.
AKG K240 MKII
JVC HA-NC260
13% have it
Trending
15. travel bag is included
The device comes with its own special case or pouch, which is useful for safe transportation.
AKG K240 MKII
JVC HA-NC260
63% have it
16. has a straight plug
A straight plug is better when the jack is on the top or bottom of your player.
AKG K240 MKII
JVC HA-NC260
50% have it
17. has included ear pads
Allows you to change ear pads without buying new ones.
AKG K240 MKII
JVC HA-NC260
42% have it
18. has an L-shaped plug
An L-shaped plug is better if the jack is on the left or right side of the device, so that the cable isn't bent, and is less likely to break when the device is in your pocket.
AKG K240 MKII
JVC HA-NC260
31% have it
19. has a 3.5mm male connector
A standard 3.5mm male connector is suitable for use with all MP3 players and computer sound cards.
AKG K240 MKII
JVC HA-NC260
83% have it
20. cable length
A long cable ensures more freedom of movement.
3m
Pioneer SE-A1000: 6m
1.5m
21. has a coiled cord
A coiled cord typically offers more flexibility as it can be extended, and taken outside for example.
AKG K240 MKII
JVC HA-NC260
7% have it
22. has a removable battery
The battery is removable and can be replaced by the user if broken.
AKG K240 MKII
JVC HA-NC260
6% have it
Top 10 headphones
Similar comparisons
This page is currently only available in English.