39points

AKG K553 Pro

51points

Philips Bass+ SHL3175WT

AKG K553 Pro
Comparison winner
Philips Bass+ SHL3175WT
vs
vs

16 facts in comparison

AKG K553 Pro vs Philips Bass+ SHL3175WT

AKG K553 Pro
Philips Bass+ SHL3175WT
39
points
AKG K553 Pro
51
points
Philips Bass+ SHL3175WT

Why is AKG K553 Pro better than Philips Bass+ SHL3175WT?

  • 4500Hz higher high-frequency
    ?

    28000Hzvs23500Hz
  • 40dB/mW higher sound pressure level
    ?

    144dB/mWvs104dB/mW
  • 10mm bigger driver unit
    ?

    50mmvs40mm

Why is Philips Bass+ SHL3175WT better than AKG K553 Pro?

  • 4Hz lower low-frequency
    ?

    8Hzvs12Hz
  • Has a neodymium magnet
    ?
  • 470g lighter
    190gvs660g
  • Can be used as a headset
    ?
  • Has an in-line control panel
    ?

Price comparison

Design

1.has stereo speakers
?

Devices with stereo speakers deliver sound from independent channels on both left and right sides, creating a richer sound and a better experience.

AKG K553 Pro
Philips Bass+ SHL3175WT
2.has an over-the-ear form
?

Comfortable full-size form with earcups that fully enclose your ears. This model is loved for its increased sound isolation and the fact that it won't leak sound to your neighbors. It offers potential for maximum bass and loudness levels.

AKG K553 Pro
Philips Bass+ SHL3175WT
3.has a detachable cable
?

With a detachable cable you can use alternative cables, and if the cable is pulled it will pop out instead of breaking.

For example

Monoprice Monolith M650

AKG K553 Pro
Philips Bass+ SHL3175WT
4.weight
?

Best

Sony MDR-EX150AP

3g

660g

190g

5.has a straight plug
?

A straight plug is better when the jack is on the top or bottom of your player.

AKG K553 Pro
Philips Bass+ SHL3175WT
6.has an open-back design
?

The device is designed in a way that allows sound to go out through the back of the ear cups, which usually have vents or perforations. This design provides very natural and accurate sound.

For example

Monoprice Monolith M650

AKG K553 Pro
Philips Bass+ SHL3175WT

Sound quality

1.highest frequency
?

The highest frequency at which device produces audio. The higher the high-frequency response, the clearer and crispier the treble.

Best

Sony MDR-Z1R

120000Hz

28000Hz

23500Hz

2.lowest frequency
?

The lowest frequency at which the device produces audio. The lower the low-frequency response, the stronger and juicier the bass.

Best

Sony MH1CBLK

1Hz

12Hz

8Hz

3.sound pressure level
?

Devices with a higher sound pressure level are generally louder when supplied with any given audio source.

Best

AKG K553 Pro

144dB/mW

144dB/mW

104dB/mW

4.impedance
?

Impedance is the device’s electrical resistance to the current being pushed through it. The lower the impedance, the easier it is to get higher volume and requires less power.

Best

Flips Solo 2 Social

4 Ohms

32 Ohms

32 Ohms

5.has a neodymium magnet
?

Devices with neodymium magnets are lighter and more powerful than those which use ferrite magnets. They also have more bass and clear high notes.

AKG K553 Pro
Philips Bass+ SHL3175WT
6.driver unit size
?

The driver unit is the component that produces sound in the device. Bigger drivers are more powerful and can produce better bass.

Best

Audeze LCD2 Classic

106mm

50mm

40mm

Connectivity

1.Can be used wirelessly
?

Wireless devices allow users more freedom of movement.

For example

Skullcandy Sesh

AKG K553 Pro
Philips Bass+ SHL3175WT
2.has a 3.5mm male connector
?

A standard 3.5mm male connector is suitable for use with all MP3 players and computer sound cards.

AKG K553 Pro
Philips Bass+ SHL3175WT

Features

1.can be used as a headset
?

A headset is one headphone or pair with a built-in microphone. Headsets can be used for applications which require communication i.e. Skype, games with voice chat, mobile phones etc.

AKG K553 Pro
Philips Bass+ SHL3175WT
2.has an in-line control panel
?

There is a control panel on the cable, so you can easily operate the device without having to interact with it.

AKG K553 Pro
Philips Bass+ SHL3175WT

Which are the best headphones?

Show all
This page is currently only available in English.