AMD E2-3000M

8 Reasons why AMD E2-3000M is better

than the average

1.Appreciably lower TDP
35Wvs 67W (the average)
vs 3W (best: Intel Atom Z670)
The thermal design power (TDP) is the maximum amount of power the cooling system needs to dissipate. A lower TDP typically means that it consumes less power.
2.Sizably more L2 cache per core
0.5MB/corevs 0.4MB/core (the average)
vs 2.5MB/core (best: Intel Core i5-4200Y)
More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
3.Marginally newer version of DirectX
11vs 11 (the average)
vs 12 (best: AMD A10-7870K)
DirectX is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.
4.Considerably newer version of OpenGL
4.2vs 3.7 (the average)
vs 4.5 (best: AMD A10-7860K)
OpenGL is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.
5.Marginally newer version of OpenCL
1.2vs 1.2 (the average)
vs 2 (best: Intel Xeon E3-1275 v5)
Some applications use OpenCL to utilise the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions introduce more functionality and better performance.
6.Appreciably higher maximum operating temperature
100°Cvs 88°C (the average)
vs 105°C (best: Intel Core i7-3940XM)
If the CPU exceeds the maximum operating temperature then problems such as random resets can occur.
35mmvs 37mm (the average)
vs 6mm (best: Apple A5 APL7498)
35mmvs 36mm (the average)
vs 6mm (best: Apple A5 APL7498)
AMD E2-3000M
AMD E2-3000M specs
AMD E2-3000M features
AMD E2-3000M pros and cons
AMD E2-3000M advantages
AMD E2-3000M disadvantages