AOC E1659FWUBenQ GW2450
Top 39%606 points
Top 39%
Top 39%606 points
Top 39%
AOC E1659FWU
BenQ GW2450
vs
Top specs and features

AOC E1659FWU vs BenQ GW2450: 20 facts in comparison

1. response time

Response time is how long it takes for a display to change the state of pixels, in order to show new content. The less time it takes to respond, the less likely it is to blur fast-changing images.
8ms
Acer Predator XB2 (XB252Q) 24.5": 1ms
4ms

2. power consumption operation

How much power the device consumes when it's switched on.
8W
Sharp LB-1085: 1.1W
25W

3. screen size

The bigger the screen size is, the better the user experience.
15.6"
Sharp LB-1085: 108"
24"

4. every pixel has three subpixels

The device has a display with three full subpixels per pixel, resulting in a sharp and crisp picture. Pixels in some displays (like AMOLED) share one subpixel to preserve space. This can result in a less crisp, slightly blurred image.
AOC E1659FWU
BenQ GW2450
85% have it

5. resolution

1.98x higher resolution.
1366 x 768px
Dell UltraSharp UP3218K: 7680 x 4320px
1920 x 1080px

6. supports total tilt

Total tilt adjustment is the ability for the monitor head to move up and down. Tilt adjustment enables a user to change the viewing position of the display, creating a more comfortable view of the screen.
AOC E1659FWU
BenQ GW2450
83% have it

7. contrast ratio

Contrast ratio is the visual distance between the lightest and the darkest colors that may be reproduced on the display. A high contrast ratio is desired, resulting in richer dark colors and more distinctive color gradation.
20000000:1
Acer XB0 XB240H 24": 100000000:1
5000:1

8. luminance

Luminance is the intensity of light that a device emits.
200cd/m²
Acer Predator X35 35" UW-UXGA: 1000cd/m²
250cd/m²

9. maximum horizontal viewing angle

Horizontal viewing angle is the maximum angle at which a display can be viewed with acceptable visual performance.
90º
LG 32UK950 32": 178º
178º

10. has an LED-backlit display

Uses LED backlighting, resulting in better image quality, more vibrant colors and richer blacks.
AOC E1659FWU
BenQ GW2450
79% have it

11. weight

2.9kg lighter.
1.2kg
Asus VX278Q 27": 4.5g
4.1kg

12. shipping weight

The gross weight of the product when packaged, including all wrapping, and boxing.
1.76kg
Asus VP247N 23.6": 0.8kg
5.6kg

13. power consumption on standby

How much power the device consumes when shut down but still plugged in.
1W
Asus MB168B Plus: 0W
0.3W

14. thickness

156.1mm thinner.
22.9mm
LG 22EA53VQ: 5.5mm
179mm

15. Supports VESA mount

The VESA mount is a standard used by most manufacturers. A device that supports the VESA mount can be mounted on many different supports, from arms to wall mounts.
AOC E1659FWU
BenQ GW2450
69% have it

16. height

204.3mm shorter.
232.7mm
Asus VP228N 21.5": 3.9mm
437mm

17. maximum vertical viewing angle

Vertical viewing angle is the maximum angle at which a display can be viewed with acceptable visual performance.
50º
LG 32UK950 32": 178º
178º

18. width

208.1mm narrower.
371.9mm
Toshiba PA3923U-2LC3: 340.5mm
580mm

19. Has a swivel stand

A swivel stand allows you to adjust the position of the display left or right, so you can position it to the desired angle.
AOC E1659FWU
BenQ GW2450
34% have it

20. has a VGA connector

VGA connector is a widespread connector and is found on many video cards, computer monitors, and some television sets.
AOC E1659FWU
BenQ GW2450
76% have it

Top 10 monitors

Add to comparison
    Compare
    This page is currently only available in English.