| Audio-Technica ATH-M20 | Bowers & Wilkins P7 |
Top 49%711 points Top 49% 25 likes | Top 39%856 points Top 39% 34 likes |
 |  vs |
Top specs and features
Audio-Technica ATH-M20 vs Bowers & Wilkins P7: 21 facts in comparison
1. highest frequency
The highest frequency at which device produces audio. The higher the high-frequency response, the clearer and crispier the treble.
20000Hz
Sony MDR-Z1R: 120000Hz
20000Hz
2. lowest frequency
The lowest frequency at which the device produces audio. The lower the low-frequency response, the stronger and juicier the bass.
30Hz
Sony MH1CBLK: 1Hz
10Hz
3. weight
60g lighter.
230g
Sony MDR-EX150AP: 3g
290g
4. has sound isolation/passive noise reduction
The device sits tightly in place, creating an acoustic seal which reduces background noise and prevents your music from leaking out.
Audio-Technica ATH-M20
Bowers & Wilkins P7
45% have it
5. impedance
Impedance is the device’s electrical resistance to the current being pushed through it. The lower the impedance, the easier it is to get higher volume and requires less power.
40 Ohms
Flips Solo 2 Social: 4 Ohms
22 Ohms
6. has a neodymium magnet
Devices with neodymium magnets are lighter and more powerful than those which use ferrite magnets. They also have more bass and clear high notes.
Audio-Technica ATH-M20
Bowers & Wilkins P7
35% have it
7. sound pressure level
Devices with a higher sound pressure level are generally louder when supplied with any given audio source.
98dB/mW
AKG K553 Pro: 144dB/mW
111dB/mW
8. no battery needed
This device works without batteries. It weighs less and you don't have to worry about recharging or replacing the battery.
Audio-Technica ATH-M20
Bowers & Wilkins P7
69% have it
9. has a tangle free cable
The cable is designed to minimize tangling.
Audio-Technica ATH-M20
Bowers & Wilkins P7
24% have it
10. has a detachable cable
With a detachable cable you can use alternative cables, and if the cable is pulled it will pop out instead of breaking.
Audio-Technica ATH-M20
Bowers & Wilkins P7
39% have it
11. can be folded
Folding devices are good for transporting as they take up less space in your bag.
Audio-Technica ATH-M20
Bowers & Wilkins P7
31% have it
12. has an in-line control panel
There is a control panel on the cable, so you can easily operate the device without having to interact with it.
Audio-Technica ATH-M20
Bowers & Wilkins P7
46% have it
13. has stereo speakers
Devices with stereo speakers deliver sound from independent channels on both left and right sides, creating a richer sound and a better experience.
Audio-Technica ATH-M20
Bowers & Wilkins P7
76% have it
14. driver unit size
The driver unit is the component that produces sound in the device. Bigger drivers are more powerful and can produce better bass.
40mm
Audeze LCD2 Classic: 106mm
40mm
Trending
15. has an over-the-ear form
Comfortable full-size form with earcups that fully enclose your ears. This model is loved for its increased sound isolation and the fact that it won't leak sound to your neighbors. It offers potential for maximum bass and loudness levels.
Audio-Technica ATH-M20
Bowers & Wilkins P7
40% have it
16. has included ear pads
Allows you to change ear pads without buying new ones.
Audio-Technica ATH-M20
Bowers & Wilkins P7
42% have it
17. travel bag is included
The device comes with its own special case or pouch, which is useful for safe transportation.
Audio-Technica ATH-M20
Bowers & Wilkins P7
63% have it
18. has a straight plug
A straight plug is better when the jack is on the top or bottom of your player.
Audio-Technica ATH-M20
Bowers & Wilkins P7
50% have it
19. has a 3.5mm male connector
A standard 3.5mm male connector is suitable for use with all MP3 players and computer sound cards.
Audio-Technica ATH-M20
Bowers & Wilkins P7
83% have it
20. cable length
A long cable ensures more freedom of movement.
3m
Pioneer SE-A1000: 6m
1.2m
21. has a coiled cord
A coiled cord typically offers more flexibility as it can be extended, and taken outside for example.
Audio-Technica ATH-M20
Bowers & Wilkins P7
7% have it
Top 10 headphones
Similar comparisons
This page is currently only available in English.