Casio Exilim EX-Z2000

10 Reasons why Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 is better

than the average

149gvs 376g (the average)
vs 65.5g (best: HTC Re)
58.5mmvs 95.2mm (the average)
vs 26.2mm (best: DxO One)
3.Distinctly less body volume
116.4cm³vs 531.1cm³ (the average)
vs 65.29cm³ (best: Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX55)
19.8mmvs 50.8mm (the average)
vs 13mm (best: Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX55)
5.Slightly bigger screen size
3"vs 3" (the average)
vs 4.8" (best: Samsung Galaxy Camera (Wi-Fi))
The bigger the screen size is, the better the user experience.
6.Can be charged via standard USB cable
Yesvs No (81% don't have it)
It can be charged and operated with a standard USB cable connected to your computer, or with a USB power supply.
7.Explicitly less shutter lag
0.09svs 16.33s (the average)
vs 0.00025s (best: Leica M Typ 240)
The amount of time it takes the camera to take a photo, without having to focus.
8.Significantly more microphone(s)
2vs 1 (the average)
vs 2 (best: Sony Alpha a6500)
More microphones result in better sound quality and enable the device to filter out background noise.
9.Amply wider aperture at minimum focal length
2.8vs 3.0 (the average)
vs 1 (best: Leica Q (Typ 116))
With a wider aperture the sensor can capture more light, helping to avoid blur by enabling a faster shutter speed. It also provides a shallow depth of field, allowing you to blur the background to focus attention on the subject.
10.Shorter minimum focal length
26mmvs 27mm (the average)
vs 1.18mm (best: HP Photosmart R937)
A shorter minimum focal length allows you to get more of the scene in the photo, and offers a wider angle of view than longer focal lengths.
Casio Exilim EX-Z2000
Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 specs
Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 features
Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 pros and cons
Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 advantages
Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 disadvantages