Casio Exilim EX-ZS6

10 Reasons why Casio Exilim EX-ZS6 is better

than the average

137gvs 376g (the average)
vs 65.5g (best: HTC Re)
2.A little higher pixel density
366ppivs 360ppi (the average)
vs 544ppi (best: Sony A7)
56.9mmvs 95.2mm (the average)
vs 26.2mm (best: DxO One)
95.8mmvs 96.6mm (the average)
vs 39mm (best: Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V)
5.Vastly less body volume
112.83cm³vs 531.12cm³ (the average)
vs 65.29cm³ (best: Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX55)
20.7mmvs 50.8mm (the average)
vs 13mm (best: Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX55)
7.Can be charged via standard USB cable
Yesvs No (81% don't have it)
It can be charged and operated with a standard USB cable connected to your computer, or with a USB power supply.
8.Explicitly less shutter lag
0.07svs 16.33s (the average)
vs 0.00025s (best: Leica M Typ 240)
The amount of time it takes the camera to take a photo, without having to focus.
9.A lot wider aperture at minimum focal length
2.8vs 3.0 (the average)
vs 1 (best: Leica Q (Typ 116))
With a wider aperture the sensor can capture more light, helping to avoid blur by enabling a faster shutter speed. It also provides a shallow depth of field, allowing you to blur the background to focus attention on the subject.
10.Shorter minimum focal length
26mmvs 27mm (the average)
vs 1.18mm (best: HP Photosmart R937)
A shorter minimum focal length allows you to get more of the scene in the photo, and offers a wider angle of view than longer focal lengths.
Casio Exilim EX-ZS6
Casio Exilim EX-ZS6 specs
Casio Exilim EX-ZS6 features
Casio Exilim EX-ZS6 pros and cons
Casio Exilim EX-ZS6 advantages
Casio Exilim EX-ZS6 disadvantages