Creative Aurvana In-Ear

8 Reasons why Creative Aurvana In-Ear is better

than the average

1.Explicitly lower low-frequency
20Hzvs 38Hz (the average)
vs 1Hz (best: Sony MH1CBLK)
The lowest frequency at which the device produces audio. The lower the low-frequency response, the stronger and juicier the bass.
13gvs 191g (the average)
vs 3g (best: AKG IP2)
3.Modestly lower impedance
42Ohmsvs 42Ohms (the average)
vs 4Ohms (best: Flips Solo 2 Social)
Impedance is the device’s electrical resistance to the current being pushed through it. The lower the impedance, the easier it is to get higher volume and requires less power.
4.Has sound isolation / passive noise reduction
Yesvs No (51% don't have it)
The device sits tightly in place, creating an acoustic seal which reduces background noise and prevents your music from leaking out.
5.Explicitly higher sound pressure level
115dB/mWvs 104dB/mW (the average)
vs 130dB/mW (best: Audeze EL-8 Titanium)
Devices with a higher sound pressure level are generally louder when supplied with any given audio source.
6.Has included ear pads
Yesvs No (58% don't have it)
Allows you to change ear pads without buying new ones.
7.Substantially longer cable
2.7mvs 1.7m (the average)
vs 6m (best: AKG Q 701)
A long cable ensures more freedom of movement.
8.Has an in-ear form
Yesvs No (67% don't have it)
The in-ear device is ultracompact and lightweight, with little or no interference with earrings, spectacles, hats, or hairstyles. It is inserted in the ear canal itself and blocks out a lot of environmental noise. It has stronger bass tones and is unlikely to fall out of the ear.
Creative Aurvana In-Ear
Creative Aurvana In-Ear specs
Creative Aurvana In-Ear features
Creative Aurvana In-Ear pros and cons
Creative Aurvana In-Ear advantages
Creative Aurvana In-Ear disadvantages