Dell U2414HLG 29EA93
Top 16%710 points
Top 16%
Top 11%753 points
Top 11%
Dell U2414H
LG 29EA93
vs
Top specs and features

Dell U2414H vs LG 29EA93: 30 facts in comparison

1. response time

Response time is how long it takes for a display to change the state of pixels, in order to show new content. The less time it takes to respond, the less likely it is to blur fast-changing images.
8ms
Samsung CHG70 32": 1ms
5ms

2. power consumption operation

How much power the device consumes when it's switched on.
74W
Sharp LB-1085: 1.1W
48W

3. screen size

The bigger the screen size is, the better the user experience.
23.8"
Sharp LB-1085: 108"
29"

4. has a HDMI output

Devices with a HDMI or mini HDMI port can transfer high definition video and audio to a display.
Dell U2414H
LG 29EA93
60% have it

5. contrast ratio

Contrast ratio is the visual distance between the lightest and the darkest colour that may be reproduced on the display. A high contrast ratio is desired, resulting in richer dark colours and more distinctive color gradation.
2000000:1
Acer XB0 XB240H 24": 100000000:1
5000000:1

6. supports total tilt

Total tilt adjustment is the ability for the monitor head to move up and down. Tilt adjustment enables a user to change the viewing position of the display, creating a more comfortable view of the screen.
Dell U2414H
LG 29EA93
83% have it

7. has anti-glare

Anti-glare helps to reduce the external reflections of light coming from outside the display.
Dell U2414H
LG 29EA93
27% have it

8. has an IPS screen

IPS (In-Plane Switching) is a technology used for LCDs. It was designed to overcome the main limitations of normal TFTs TN-matrices: relatively slow response times, small viewing angles and low quality color reproduction.
Dell U2414H
LG 29EA93
33% have it

9. has a DVI connector

Devices that have a DVI connector (usually computers and notebooks) can be connected to the TV set.
Dell U2414H
LG 29EA93
56% have it

10. resolution

25% higher resolution.
1920 x 1080px
Dell UltraSharp UP3218K: 7680 x 4320px
2560 x 1080px

11. weight

110g lighter.
5.76kg
Asus VX278Q 27": 4.5g
5.65kg

12. power consumption on standby

How much power the device consumes when shut down but still plugged in.
0.5W
Asus MB168B Plus: 0W
1.2W

13. height

3.1mm shorter.
321.1mm
Asus VP228N 21.5": 3.9mm
318mm

14. luminance

Luminance is the intensity of light that a device emits.
250cd/m²
Acer Predator X35 35" UW-UXGA: 1000cd/m²
300cd/m²

15. maximum horizontal viewing angle

Horizontal viewing angle is the maximum angle at which a display can be viewed with acceptable visual performance.
178º
Acer Predator X35 35" UW-UXGA: 178º
178º

16. has stereo speakers

Devices with stereo speakers deliver sound that surrounds the user from left and right side, creating a richer sound and a better experience.
Dell U2414H
LG 29EA93
29% have it

17. pixel density

3.39% higher pixel density.
92.56ppi
Dell UltraSharp UP3218K: 280ppi
95.81ppi

18. shipping weight

The shipping weight gives you the information about the all package weight.
8kg
Asus VP247N 23.6": 0.8kg
7.8kg

19. supports swivel

Swivel is the ability for the monitor head to be rotated left or right. This enables users to share screen images without causing visual distortion.
Dell U2414H
LG 29EA93
34% have it

20. width

160.6mm narrower.
539.1mm
Toshiba PA3923U-2LC3: 340.5mm
699.7mm

21. thickness

22.9mm thinner.
45.6mm
LG 22EA53VQ: 5.5mm
68.5mm

22. has a socket for a 3.5 mm audio jack

With a standard mini jack socket, you can use the device with most headphones.
Dell U2414H
LG 29EA93
41% have it

23. has LED-backlit display

Uses LED backlighting, resulting in better image quality, more vibrant colours and richer blacks.
Dell U2414H
LG 29EA93
79% have it

24. display colors

Number of colors that a display can accurately reproduce.
16.77m
Dell UltraSharp UP2716D 27": 1074m
16.7m

25. USB version

Newer USB versions are faster and have better power management.
3
Acer H7 H277HU 27": 3.1
3

Top 10 monitors

Add to comparison
  • Dell U2414H
  • LG 29EA93
Compare
This page is currently only available in English.