Fujifilm X-M1 + XC 16-50mm F3.5-5.6 OIS

32 Reasons why Fujifilm X-M1 + XC 16-50mm F3.5-5.6 OIS is better

than the average

1.Appreciably larger sensor
23.6 x 15.6mmvs 14.6 x 10.8mm (the average)
vs 81.2 x 25.4mm (best: Polaroid Snap)
The larger the sensor the more light the sensor captures yielding in better image quality.
2.Sizably more focus points
49vs 37 (the average)
vs 425 (best: Sony Alpha a6500)
The more focus points the more flexibility in picking which part of the scene to focus on. They also give the image sensor a better probability in identifying the right area of the scene to focus on in more automatic modes.
3.Has a flip-out screen
Yesvs No (75% don't have it)
Flip-out screens are useful for doing tricky shots.
330gvs 376g (the average)
vs 65.5g (best: HTC Re)
5.Noticeably higher maximum light sensitivity
25600ISOvs 19130ISO (the average)
vs 3280000ISO (best: Nikon D5)
With a higher light sensitivity (ISO level), the sensor absorbs more light. This can be used to capture moving objects using a fast shutter speed, or to take images in low light without using a flash.
6.Has a stereo microphone
Yesvs No (53% don't have it)
A stereo microphone allows to record audio files or movies in stereo without an external microphone.
7.Lots higher pixel density
471ppivs 360ppi (the average)
vs 544ppi (best: Sony A7)
8.A bit more battery power
1260mAhvs 1212mAh (the average)
vs 4360mAh (best: Samsung Galaxy NX Mirrorless)
67mmvs 97mm (the average)
vs 39mm (best: Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V)
10.Substantially higher resolution (screen)
920000k dotsvs 43617k dots (the average)
vs 1230000k dots (best: Fujifilm FinePix X-Pro1)
A higher screen resolution provides a sharper image, making it easier to review your photos.
11.Considerably less body volume
303.18cm³vs 531.12cm³ (the average)
vs 65.29cm³ (best: Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX55)
39mmvs 51mm (the average)
vs 13mm (best: Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX55)
13.Substantially higher resolution
783x1,175pxvs 875x609px (the average)
vs 1,517x1,011px (best: Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH2K + Lumix G Vario 14-42mm/ F3.5-5.6 ASPH./ MEGA O.I.S)
14.Marginally bigger screen size
3"vs 3" (the average)
vs 4.8" (best: Samsung Galaxy Camera (Wi-Fi))
The bigger the screen size is, the better the user experience.
15.Faster photo autofocus due to a phase detection autofocus when shooting pictures
Yesvs No (71% don't have it)
A phase detection autofocus is much faster than a contrast detection autofocus and allows sharper images.
16.Is a system camera
Yesvs No (58% don't have it)
A system camera has lots of changeable parts such as lenses, flashes and other accessories. They offer greater flexibility than compact cameras.
17.Appreciably less shutter lag
0.05svs 16.33s (the average)
vs 0.00025s (best: Leica M Typ 240)
The amount of time it takes the camera to take a photo, without having to focus.
18.Can be controlled remotely
Yesvs No (57% don't have it)
A remote control allows you to control the device remotely. The remote control can be included or optional.
19.Has manual shutter speed
Yesvs No (56% don't have it)
This allows to manually set the shutter speed.
20.Notably less startup delay
0.5svs 34.8s (the average)
vs 0.01s (best: Nikon D70)
It takes less time for the camera to turn on and take a first picture.
21.Image quality.
Fuji's X-Trans Cmos sensor does not require an Optical low pass filter to reduce moire, thus has cleaner and sharper images, with better low light performance.
Fujifilm XC 16-50mm F3.5-5.6 OIS
Yesvs No (the average)
Fujifilm X-M1 + XC 16-50mm F3.5-5.6 OIS
Fujifilm X-M1 + XC 16-50mm F3.5-5.6 OIS specs
Fujifilm X-M1 + XC 16-50mm F3.5-5.6 OIS features
Fujifilm X-M1 + XC 16-50mm F3.5-5.6 OIS pros and cons
Fujifilm X-M1 + XC 16-50mm F3.5-5.6 OIS advantages
Fujifilm X-M1 + XC 16-50mm F3.5-5.6 OIS disadvantages