HP Photosmart E317

7 Reasons why HP Photosmart E317 is better

than the average

120gvs 376g (the average)
vs 65.5g (best: HTC Re)
2.Considerably better color depth
36bitsvs 23bits (the average)
vs 42bits (best: HP Photosmart R927)
The better a device's color depth the more color nuances it can distinguish. Source: DxOMark.
53mmvs 95mm (the average)
vs 26.2mm (best: DxO One)
4.Significantly less body volume
167.9cm³vs 531.1cm³ (the average)
vs 65.29cm³ (best: Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX55)
32mmvs 51mm (the average)
vs 13mm (best: Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX55)
6.Supports AVCHD format
Yesvs No (75% don't have it)
AVCHD (Advanced Video Coding High Definition) is a file-based format for the digital recording and playback of high-definition video. It's a standard popular among professional cameras and camcorders.
7.Way wider aperture at minimum focal length
2.8vs 3.0 (the average)
vs 1 (best: Leica Q (Typ 116))
With a wider aperture the sensor can capture more light, helping to avoid blur by enabling a faster shutter speed. It also provides a shallow depth of field, allowing you to blur the background to focus attention on the subject.
HP Photosmart E317
HP Photosmart E317 specs
HP Photosmart E317 features
HP Photosmart E317 pros and cons
HP Photosmart E317 advantages
HP Photosmart E317 disadvantages