HP Photosmart M425

8 Reasons why HP Photosmart M425 is better

than the average

166gvs 376g (the average)
vs 65.5g (best: HTC Re)
2.Appreciably better color depth
36bitsvs 23bits (the average)
vs 42bits (best: HP Photosmart R927)
The better a device's color depth the more color nuances it can distinguish. Source: DxOMark.
62mmvs 95mm (the average)
vs 26.2mm (best: DxO One)
95mmvs 97mm (the average)
vs 39mm (best: Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V)
5.Noticeably less body volume
182.59cm³vs 531.12cm³ (the average)
vs 65.29cm³ (best: Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX55)
31mmvs 51mm (the average)
vs 13mm (best: Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX55)
7.Supports AVCHD format
Yesvs No (75% don't have it)
AVCHD (Advanced Video Coding High Definition) is a file-based format for the digital recording and playback of high-definition video. It's a standard popular among professional cameras and camcorders.
8.Much wider aperture at minimum focal length
2.8vs 3.0 (the average)
vs 1 (best: Leica Q (Typ 116))
With a wider aperture the sensor can capture more light, helping to avoid blur by enabling a faster shutter speed. It also provides a shallow depth of field, allowing you to blur the background to focus attention on the subject.
HP Photosmart M425
HP Photosmart M425 specs
HP Photosmart M425 features
HP Photosmart M425 pros and cons
HP Photosmart M425 advantages
HP Photosmart M425 disadvantages