HP Photosmart M525

7 Reasons why HP Photosmart M525 is better

than the average

166gvs 376g (the average)
vs 65.5g (best: HTC Re)
2.Vastly better color depth
36bitsvs 23bits (the average)
vs 42bits (best: HP Photosmart R927)
The better a device's color depth the more color nuances it can distinguish. Source: DxOMark.
62mmvs 95mm (the average)
vs 26.2mm (best: DxO One)
95mmvs 97mm (the average)
vs 39mm (best: Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V)
5.Measurably less body volume
182.59cm³vs 531.12cm³ (the average)
vs 65.29cm³ (best: Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX55)
31mmvs 51mm (the average)
vs 13mm (best: Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX55)
7.Way wider aperture at minimum focal length
2.8vs 3.0 (the average)
vs 1 (best: Leica Q (Typ 116))
With a wider aperture the sensor can capture more light, helping to avoid blur by enabling a faster shutter speed. It also provides a shallow depth of field, allowing you to blur the background to focus attention on the subject.
HP Photosmart M525
HP Photosmart M525 specs
HP Photosmart M525 features
HP Photosmart M525 pros and cons
HP Photosmart M525 advantages
HP Photosmart M525 disadvantages